Efficacy and safety of avacopan in patients aged 65 years and older with ANCA-associated vasculitis: a post hoc analysis of data from the ADVOCATE trial.
Duvuru Geetha, Christian Pagnoux, Sebastian E Sattui, Peter A Merkel, Maria Weiner, Juliana Draibe, Stanislas Faguer, Sarah Bray, Rachel E Gurlin, Monica Balcells-Oliver, Annette Bruchfeld, David R Jayne
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of avacopan in patients aged 65 years and older with ANCA-associated vasculitis: a post hoc analysis of data from the ADVOCATE trial.","authors":"Duvuru Geetha, Christian Pagnoux, Sebastian E Sattui, Peter A Merkel, Maria Weiner, Juliana Draibe, Stanislas Faguer, Sarah Bray, Rachel E Gurlin, Monica Balcells-Oliver, Annette Bruchfeld, David R Jayne","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keaf122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of avacopan in patients aged ≥65 years with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) or microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) in the phase 3 ADVOCATE trial of avacopan vs a prednisone taper, plus either rituximab or cyclophosphamide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this descriptive, post hoc analysis, patients receiving avacopan or a prednisone taper were stratified by age. Key efficacy outcomes included the rate of remission at week 26 and sustained remission at week 52.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 160 patients aged ≥65, 109 were aged 65-74 and 51 were ≥75. Remission at week 26 was achieved in 71.7% vs 69.4% of patients aged 65-74 and 73.1% vs 72.0% aged ≥75 in the avacopan vs prednisone taper groups, respectively. Sustained remission at week 52 was observed in 65.0% vs 55.1% of patients aged 65-74 and 65.4% vs 56.0% aged ≥75. Relapse rates in the avacopan vs prednisone taper groups were 12.3% vs 18.8% and 3.8% vs 20.8% in the 65-74 and ≥75 subgroups, respectively. Improvements in estimated glomerular filtration rate and health-related quality of life were observed in both treatment groups. Use of avacopan compared with a prednisone taper was associated with a 61% and 49% reduction in mean glucocorticoid dose in the 65-74 and ≥75 subgroups, respectively, and lower glucocorticoid toxicity. The proportions of patients with adverse events were similar between treatment groups within each age subgroup.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data support the efficacy and safety of an avacopan-based regimen to treat patients with GPA or MPA aged ≥65.</p>","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"3863-3871"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107037/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaf122","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of avacopan in patients aged ≥65 years with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) or microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) in the phase 3 ADVOCATE trial of avacopan vs a prednisone taper, plus either rituximab or cyclophosphamide.
Methods: In this descriptive, post hoc analysis, patients receiving avacopan or a prednisone taper were stratified by age. Key efficacy outcomes included the rate of remission at week 26 and sustained remission at week 52.
Results: Of 160 patients aged ≥65, 109 were aged 65-74 and 51 were ≥75. Remission at week 26 was achieved in 71.7% vs 69.4% of patients aged 65-74 and 73.1% vs 72.0% aged ≥75 in the avacopan vs prednisone taper groups, respectively. Sustained remission at week 52 was observed in 65.0% vs 55.1% of patients aged 65-74 and 65.4% vs 56.0% aged ≥75. Relapse rates in the avacopan vs prednisone taper groups were 12.3% vs 18.8% and 3.8% vs 20.8% in the 65-74 and ≥75 subgroups, respectively. Improvements in estimated glomerular filtration rate and health-related quality of life were observed in both treatment groups. Use of avacopan compared with a prednisone taper was associated with a 61% and 49% reduction in mean glucocorticoid dose in the 65-74 and ≥75 subgroups, respectively, and lower glucocorticoid toxicity. The proportions of patients with adverse events were similar between treatment groups within each age subgroup.
Conclusion: These data support the efficacy and safety of an avacopan-based regimen to treat patients with GPA or MPA aged ≥65.
阿伐潘对 65 岁及以上 ANCA 相关性血管炎患者的疗效和安全性:对 ADVOCATE 试验数据的事后分析。
目的:在3期ADVOCATE临床试验中,评价阿伐科泮与强的松减量联合利妥昔单抗或环磷酰胺治疗≥65岁肉芽肿病合并多血管炎(GPA)或显微多血管炎(MPA)患者的疗效和安全性。方法:在这个描述性的事后分析中,接受阿瓦库泮或泼尼松减量治疗的患者按年龄分层。主要疗效指标包括26周的缓解率和52周的持续缓解率。结果:160例≥65岁患者中,65 ~ 74岁患者109例,≥75岁患者51例。65-74岁患者的缓解率分别为71.7%和69.4%,≥75岁患者的缓解率分别为73.1%和72.0%,avacopan组和泼尼松组的缓解率分别为73.1%和72.0%。65.0% vs 55.1%的65-74岁患者在第52周持续缓解,65.4% vs 56.0%的≥75岁患者持续缓解。在65-74和≥75亚组中,阿伐科泮与泼尼松逐渐减少组的复发率分别为12.3%对18.8%和3.8%对20.8%。两个治疗组的eGFR和HRQoL均有改善。在65-74亚组和≥75亚组中,与泼尼松逐渐减少相比,使用阿瓦库潘可分别使平均糖皮质激素剂量减少61%和49%,并且糖皮质激素毒性降低。在每个年龄亚组中,治疗组之间不良事件的患者比例相似。结论:这些数据支持以阿瓦科泮为基础的方案治疗≥65岁GPA或MPA患者的有效性和安全性。
期刊介绍:
Rheumatology strives to support research and discovery by publishing the highest quality original scientific papers with a focus on basic, clinical and translational research. The journal’s subject areas cover a wide range of paediatric and adult rheumatological conditions from an international perspective. It is an official journal of the British Society for Rheumatology, published by Oxford University Press.
Rheumatology publishes original articles, reviews, editorials, guidelines, concise reports, meta-analyses, original case reports, clinical vignettes, letters and matters arising from published material. The journal takes pride in serving the global rheumatology community, with a focus on high societal impact in the form of podcasts, videos and extended social media presence, and utilizing metrics such as Altmetric. Keep up to date by following the journal on Twitter @RheumJnl.