Disparities of Aspirin Administration for Prehospital Chest Pain and ST Elevation Myocardial Infarctions.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Anna Maria Johnson, Hei Kit Chan, Renee Johnson, Anastasia S Papin, Daniel C Walter, N Clay Mann, Benjamin Fisher, Larissa Myaskovsky, Ryan M Huebinger
{"title":"Disparities of Aspirin Administration for Prehospital Chest Pain and ST Elevation Myocardial Infarctions.","authors":"Anna Maria Johnson, Hei Kit Chan, Renee Johnson, Anastasia S Papin, Daniel C Walter, N Clay Mann, Benjamin Fisher, Larissa Myaskovsky, Ryan M Huebinger","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2473684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Although disparities exist in aspirin administration for chest pain and ST elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMI), little is known about community-based disparities in aspirin administration for prehospital patients. We evaluated disparities in prehospital aspirin using a national prehospital database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of the 2018-2021 NEMSIS database linked to census data, including adult prehospital encounters. We created two cohorts: dispatch reason of chest pain and identified STEMI on prehospital EKG. We stratified patients based on majority ZIP Code race/ethnicity (>50% White, Black, and Hispanic) and into quartiles based on household income. Using multivariable logistic regression, we evaluated the association between incident community characteristics and aspirin administration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 4,881,663 chest pain encounters and 184,610 STEMIs. Chest pain encounters in majority White communities (32.3%) received aspirin more often for chest pain than Black (22.1%; aOR 0.59, [0.59-0.60]) or Hispanic (24.8%; aOR 0.66, [0.66-0.67]) communities. Compared to the top income quartile (29.0%), the lowest income quartile had lower odds of aspirin administration (4th-27.6%; aOR 0.93, [0.92-0.94]). For STEMIs, adjusted odds of aspirin administration were higher for White (53.4%) than Black (52.5%; aOR 0.81, [0.78-0.84]) or Hispanic (53.6%; aOR 0.93, [0.89-0.96]) patients. Compared to the highest income quartile (55.0%), lower quartiles had lower odds of aspirin administration (2nd-54.2%; aOR 0.95, [0.92-0.97]; 3rd-52.9%; aOR 0.93, [0.91-0.96]; 4th-52.0%; aOR 0.86, [0.84-0.89]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients from Black, Hispanic/Latino, and lowest-income communities received aspirin for chest pain at a lower rate than white or high-income patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2473684","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Although disparities exist in aspirin administration for chest pain and ST elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMI), little is known about community-based disparities in aspirin administration for prehospital patients. We evaluated disparities in prehospital aspirin using a national prehospital database.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the 2018-2021 NEMSIS database linked to census data, including adult prehospital encounters. We created two cohorts: dispatch reason of chest pain and identified STEMI on prehospital EKG. We stratified patients based on majority ZIP Code race/ethnicity (>50% White, Black, and Hispanic) and into quartiles based on household income. Using multivariable logistic regression, we evaluated the association between incident community characteristics and aspirin administration.

Results: We included 4,881,663 chest pain encounters and 184,610 STEMIs. Chest pain encounters in majority White communities (32.3%) received aspirin more often for chest pain than Black (22.1%; aOR 0.59, [0.59-0.60]) or Hispanic (24.8%; aOR 0.66, [0.66-0.67]) communities. Compared to the top income quartile (29.0%), the lowest income quartile had lower odds of aspirin administration (4th-27.6%; aOR 0.93, [0.92-0.94]). For STEMIs, adjusted odds of aspirin administration were higher for White (53.4%) than Black (52.5%; aOR 0.81, [0.78-0.84]) or Hispanic (53.6%; aOR 0.93, [0.89-0.96]) patients. Compared to the highest income quartile (55.0%), lower quartiles had lower odds of aspirin administration (2nd-54.2%; aOR 0.95, [0.92-0.97]; 3rd-52.9%; aOR 0.93, [0.91-0.96]; 4th-52.0%; aOR 0.86, [0.84-0.89]).

Conclusions: Patients from Black, Hispanic/Latino, and lowest-income communities received aspirin for chest pain at a lower rate than white or high-income patients.

院前胸痛和ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者服用阿司匹林的差异
目的:尽管胸痛和ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的阿司匹林用药存在差异,但院前患者阿司匹林用药的社区差异尚不清楚。我们使用国家院前数据库评估院前阿司匹林的差异。方法:我们对与人口普查数据相关的2018-2021年NEMSIS数据库进行了回顾性分析,包括成人院前接触。我们创建了两个队列:胸痛的分派原因和院前心电图确定的STEMI。我们根据大多数邮政编码的种族/民族(约50%为白人、黑人和西班牙裔)对患者进行分层,并根据家庭收入将患者分为四分位数。使用多变量逻辑回归,我们评估了事件社区特征与阿司匹林给药之间的关系。结果:我们纳入了4881663例胸痛患者和184610例stemi患者。大多数白人社区(32.3%)胸痛患者服用阿司匹林的频率高于黑人(22.1%);aOR 0.59,[0.59-0.60])或西班牙裔(24.8%;(aOR 0.66,[0.66-0.67])。与收入最高的四分之一(29.0%)相比,收入最低的四分之一服用阿司匹林的几率较低(第4 -27.6%;aOR 0.93,[0.92-0.94])。对于stemi患者,白人(53.4%)服用阿司匹林的调整后几率高于黑人(52.5%);aOR 0.81,[0.78-0.84])或西班牙裔(53.6%;aOR 0.93,[0.89-0.96])。与收入最高的四分位数(55.0%)相比,收入较低的四分位数服用阿司匹林的几率较低(2 -54.2%;aOR 0.95, [0.92-0.97];3 rd - 52.9%;aOR 0.93, [0.91-0.96];4 th - 52.0%;aOR 0.86,[0.84-0.89])。结论:来自黑人、西班牙裔/拉丁裔和低收入社区的患者接受阿司匹林治疗胸痛的比例低于白人或高收入患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信