Broad-range polymerase chain reaction and sequencing for the diagnosis of infectious diseases.

IF 3.7 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Microbiology spectrum Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1128/spectrum.02505-24
Nicole E Putnam, Drew W Charles, James B Doub, J Kristie Johnson
{"title":"Broad-range polymerase chain reaction and sequencing for the diagnosis of infectious diseases.","authors":"Nicole E Putnam, Drew W Charles, James B Doub, J Kristie Johnson","doi":"10.1128/spectrum.02505-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Broad-range polymerase chain reaction (BR-PCR) identifies molecular signatures of microorganisms directly from clinical specimens without requiring microbial growth in culture. BR-PCR may be a powerful tool to reveal microbial causes of infectious diseases, but the impact on diagnosis and clinical management has yet to be fully defined. Consequently, the aims here were to investigate how bacterial, fungal, and mycobacterial (AFB) BR-PCR perform compared to microbiology culture methods in detecting microorganisms and to assess clinical utility, defined as the ability of the results to change antimicrobial therapy or treatment duration. Between 2018 and 2021, 348 unique specimens were sent from 327 patients seen within the University of Maryland Medical System (UMMS). Patient charts were reviewed retrospectively. Organisms identified by BR-PCR were compared to bacterial (<i>n</i> = 302), fungal (<i>n</i> = 137), and AFB (<i>n</i> = 111) cultures to determine concordance and were evaluated to determine if they led to a change in clinical management. Agreement in organism(s) reported by BR-PCR and culture was considered concordant for calculating performance data. Sensitivity of BR-PCR compared to concordant culture results was 30.9% for bacteria (25/81; 95% CI: 21.8-41.6%), 18.8% for fungi (3/16; 95% CI: 5.8-43.8%), and 33.3% for AFB (1/3; 95% CI: 5.6-79.8%) detection. The bacterial negative percent agreement of 80.1% (165/206) may reflect antibiotic pretreatment or detection of fastidious organisms. Despite longer turnaround times, BR-PCR results changed clinical care in 6% of cases. Based on these findings herein, the clinical use of BR-PCR would be best utilized when fastidious organisms are suspected, or specimens remain culture negative, but should not replace routine culture methods at this time.IMPORTANCEDetermining infectious etiology can be challenging in patients with chronic presentation and in those receiving empiric therapy. In addition to the standard of care (microbiology cultures), providers can order a broad-range polymerase chain reaction and sequencing (BR-PCR) test to identify microorganisms directly from clinical specimens and independently from culture. While studies have been done from individual hospitals or systems, there is a lack of broadly applicable clinical evidence detailing clinical scenarios in which BR-PCR should be utilized. This study adds to the growing body of literature surrounding BR-PCR clinical usage, examining assay performance and clinical utility of BR-PCR test results. Although BR-PCR and culture had low concordance among organisms identified, it was shown to complement the standard of care for uncommonly isolated and fastidious organisms. Overall, BR-PCR results changed clinical management in 6% of cases, which is similar to other studies that include a broad representation of specimen types.</p>","PeriodicalId":18670,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology spectrum","volume":" ","pages":"e0250524"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11960090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02505-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Broad-range polymerase chain reaction (BR-PCR) identifies molecular signatures of microorganisms directly from clinical specimens without requiring microbial growth in culture. BR-PCR may be a powerful tool to reveal microbial causes of infectious diseases, but the impact on diagnosis and clinical management has yet to be fully defined. Consequently, the aims here were to investigate how bacterial, fungal, and mycobacterial (AFB) BR-PCR perform compared to microbiology culture methods in detecting microorganisms and to assess clinical utility, defined as the ability of the results to change antimicrobial therapy or treatment duration. Between 2018 and 2021, 348 unique specimens were sent from 327 patients seen within the University of Maryland Medical System (UMMS). Patient charts were reviewed retrospectively. Organisms identified by BR-PCR were compared to bacterial (n = 302), fungal (n = 137), and AFB (n = 111) cultures to determine concordance and were evaluated to determine if they led to a change in clinical management. Agreement in organism(s) reported by BR-PCR and culture was considered concordant for calculating performance data. Sensitivity of BR-PCR compared to concordant culture results was 30.9% for bacteria (25/81; 95% CI: 21.8-41.6%), 18.8% for fungi (3/16; 95% CI: 5.8-43.8%), and 33.3% for AFB (1/3; 95% CI: 5.6-79.8%) detection. The bacterial negative percent agreement of 80.1% (165/206) may reflect antibiotic pretreatment or detection of fastidious organisms. Despite longer turnaround times, BR-PCR results changed clinical care in 6% of cases. Based on these findings herein, the clinical use of BR-PCR would be best utilized when fastidious organisms are suspected, or specimens remain culture negative, but should not replace routine culture methods at this time.IMPORTANCEDetermining infectious etiology can be challenging in patients with chronic presentation and in those receiving empiric therapy. In addition to the standard of care (microbiology cultures), providers can order a broad-range polymerase chain reaction and sequencing (BR-PCR) test to identify microorganisms directly from clinical specimens and independently from culture. While studies have been done from individual hospitals or systems, there is a lack of broadly applicable clinical evidence detailing clinical scenarios in which BR-PCR should be utilized. This study adds to the growing body of literature surrounding BR-PCR clinical usage, examining assay performance and clinical utility of BR-PCR test results. Although BR-PCR and culture had low concordance among organisms identified, it was shown to complement the standard of care for uncommonly isolated and fastidious organisms. Overall, BR-PCR results changed clinical management in 6% of cases, which is similar to other studies that include a broad representation of specimen types.

广泛的聚合酶链反应和测序用于传染病的诊断。
广谱聚合酶链反应(BR-PCR)可直接从临床标本中鉴定微生物的分子特征,而不需要微生物在培养基中生长。广谱聚合酶链反应可能是揭示传染病微生物病因的有力工具,但其对诊断和临床管理的影响尚未完全确定。因此,本文旨在研究细菌、真菌和分枝杆菌(AFB)BR-PCR 与微生物培养方法相比在检测微生物方面的表现,并评估临床效用,即结果改变抗菌治疗或治疗持续时间的能力。2018 年至 2021 年间,马里兰大学医疗系统(UMMS)内就诊的 327 名患者送来了 348 份独特的标本。对患者病历进行了回顾性审查。将 BR-PCR 鉴定出的病原体与细菌(n = 302)、真菌(n = 137)和 AFB(n = 111)培养物进行比较,以确定是否一致,并评估是否导致临床管理的改变。在计算绩效数据时,BR-PCR 和培养报告的病原体一致被视为一致。与一致的培养结果相比,BR-PCR 检测细菌的灵敏度为 30.9%(25/81;95% CI:21.8-41.6%),检测真菌的灵敏度为 18.8%(3/16;95% CI:5.8-43.8%),检测 AFB 的灵敏度为 33.3%(1/3;95% CI:5.6-79.8%)。细菌阴性一致率为 80.1%(165/206),这可能反映了抗生素预处理或快速微生物检测的结果。尽管周转时间较长,但在 6% 的病例中,BR-PCR 结果改变了临床治疗。根据本文的研究结果,当怀疑有快速致病菌或标本培养阴性时,最好在临床上使用 BR-PCR,但目前还不能取代常规培养方法。重要意义对于慢性病患者和接受经验性治疗的患者来说,确定感染病因可能具有挑战性。除了标准护理方法(微生物培养)外,医疗服务提供者还可以采用广谱聚合酶链反应和测序(BR-PCR)检测方法,直接从临床标本中鉴定微生物,而不依赖于培养。虽然个别医院或系统已经开展了相关研究,但还缺乏广泛适用的临床证据来详细说明应在哪些临床情况下使用 BR-PCR。围绕 BR-PCR 临床应用的文献越来越多,本研究对检测性能和 BR-PCR 检测结果的临床实用性进行了研究,为这方面的研究增添了新的内容。虽然 BR-PCR 和培养在鉴定出的微生物中一致性较低,但对于不常见的分离微生物和快速微生物,BR-PCR 被证明是对标准治疗的补充。总体而言,6%的病例的BR-PCR结果改变了临床治疗方法,这与其他广泛代表标本类型的研究结果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microbiology spectrum
Microbiology spectrum Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
1800
期刊介绍: Microbiology Spectrum publishes commissioned review articles on topics in microbiology representing ten content areas: Archaea; Food Microbiology; Bacterial Genetics, Cell Biology, and Physiology; Clinical Microbiology; Environmental Microbiology and Ecology; Eukaryotic Microbes; Genomics, Computational, and Synthetic Microbiology; Immunology; Pathogenesis; and Virology. Reviews are interrelated, with each review linking to other related content. A large board of Microbiology Spectrum editors aids in the development of topics for potential reviews and in the identification of an editor, or editors, who shepherd each collection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信