Optimizing Austere Surgical Team Efficiency: An Evaluation of Team Composition During U.S. Air Force Ground Surgical Team Training.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Robert J Edmonds, Didier N Hirwantwari, Dallas G Hansen
{"title":"Optimizing Austere Surgical Team Efficiency: An Evaluation of Team Composition During U.S. Air Force Ground Surgical Team Training.","authors":"Robert J Edmonds, Didier N Hirwantwari, Dallas G Hansen","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usaf062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The optimal size of an austere surgical team needed to perform a damage control surgery has not been established, leading to variability in team composition among the myriad of single surgeon surgical teams within the DoD. The Air Force's conventional Ground Surgical Team (GST) includes 6 members; a surgeon, emergency physician, anesthesia provider, nurse, scrub technician, and medical administrator. The purpose of this study was to establish an evidence base for team composition among single-surgeon surgical teams by evaluating whether the addition of a second nurse would lead to an increase in effectiveness during GST phase 1 course simulations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>During the 2nd week, GST phase 1 training course held at Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, GST students complete 4 high fidelity team-based simulations requiring surgical intervention. The time to first incision was chosen as the primary outcome because of its known impact on patient survival in the unsimulated environment. Secondary outcomes included first full set of vitals, first administration of blood products, and time to call for evacuation. After Institutional Review Board and command approval, baseline control time measurements were obtained during 24 simulations completed by the standard 6-person teams. Time measurements were then obtained during 24 simulations with 7-person teams which included an additional nurse.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Variation was identified in the ability of both 6-person and 7-person teams to complete the measured tasks during the simulation. The addition of a second nurse had no statistical impact on the time to task completion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The variability in \"time to first incision\" among teams during GST phase 1 course demonstrates that certain teams are more efficient in the management of their simulated patients. This study suggests that the addition of a second nurse on GST will not improve the team's efficiency; however, limitations in the study preclude any definitive conclusion. Further research is needed to identify other factors that may impact team efficiency, such as the addition of a member with a different skillset, improvement in nontechnical skills, or an increase in trauma clinical experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e2149-e2152"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usaf062","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The optimal size of an austere surgical team needed to perform a damage control surgery has not been established, leading to variability in team composition among the myriad of single surgeon surgical teams within the DoD. The Air Force's conventional Ground Surgical Team (GST) includes 6 members; a surgeon, emergency physician, anesthesia provider, nurse, scrub technician, and medical administrator. The purpose of this study was to establish an evidence base for team composition among single-surgeon surgical teams by evaluating whether the addition of a second nurse would lead to an increase in effectiveness during GST phase 1 course simulations.

Materials and methods: During the 2nd week, GST phase 1 training course held at Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, GST students complete 4 high fidelity team-based simulations requiring surgical intervention. The time to first incision was chosen as the primary outcome because of its known impact on patient survival in the unsimulated environment. Secondary outcomes included first full set of vitals, first administration of blood products, and time to call for evacuation. After Institutional Review Board and command approval, baseline control time measurements were obtained during 24 simulations completed by the standard 6-person teams. Time measurements were then obtained during 24 simulations with 7-person teams which included an additional nurse.

Results: Variation was identified in the ability of both 6-person and 7-person teams to complete the measured tasks during the simulation. The addition of a second nurse had no statistical impact on the time to task completion.

Conclusions: The variability in "time to first incision" among teams during GST phase 1 course demonstrates that certain teams are more efficient in the management of their simulated patients. This study suggests that the addition of a second nurse on GST will not improve the team's efficiency; however, limitations in the study preclude any definitive conclusion. Further research is needed to identify other factors that may impact team efficiency, such as the addition of a member with a different skillset, improvement in nontechnical skills, or an increase in trauma clinical experience.

优化严峻外科团队效率:美国空军地面外科团队训练期间的团队组成评估。
导言:执行损害控制手术所需的严峻外科团队的最佳规模尚未确定,这导致国防部内无数单个外科医生外科团队的团队组成存在差异。空军常规地面外科小组(GST)包括6名成员;外科医生、急诊医师、麻醉提供者、护士、擦洗技师和医疗管理员。本研究的目的是通过评估在GST第一阶段课程模拟中增加第二名护士是否会导致有效性的提高,为单外科医生手术团队的团队组成建立一个证据基础。材料和方法:在第二周,GST第一阶段的培训课程在俄亥俄州Wright Patterson空军基地举行,GST学生完成了4个高保真的团队模拟,需要手术干预。选择第一次切口的时间作为主要结局,因为已知它对患者在非模拟环境中的生存有影响。次要结果包括第一次全套生命体征,第一次血液制品管理,以及呼叫疏散的时间。在机构审查委员会和命令批准后,在标准的6人小组完成的24次模拟中获得了基线控制时间测量。然后,在包括一名额外护士的7人小组的24次模拟中获得时间测量值。结果:在模拟过程中,6人小组和7人小组完成测量任务的能力存在差异。增加一名护士对完成任务的时间没有统计学上的影响。结论:在GST第一阶段过程中,不同团队“到第一次切口时间”的差异表明,某些团队在管理其模拟患者方面更有效。本研究表明,在GST上增加一名护士并不会提高团队的效率;然而,这项研究的局限性使我们无法得出任何明确的结论。需要进一步的研究来确定可能影响团队效率的其他因素,例如增加具有不同技能的成员,提高非技术技能,或增加创伤临床经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Military Medicine
Military Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
393
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Military Medicine is the official international journal of AMSUS. Articles published in the journal are peer-reviewed scientific papers, case reports, and editorials. The journal also publishes letters to the editor. The objective of the journal is to promote awareness of federal medicine by providing a forum for responsible discussion of common ideas and problems relevant to federal healthcare. Its mission is: To increase healthcare education by providing scientific and other information to its readers; to facilitate communication; and to offer a prestige publication for members’ writings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信