Optimizing Austere Surgical Team Efficiency: An Evaluation of Team Composition During U.S. Air Force Ground Surgical Team Training.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Robert J Edmonds, Didier N Hirwantwari, Dallas G Hansen
{"title":"Optimizing Austere Surgical Team Efficiency: An Evaluation of Team Composition During U.S. Air Force Ground Surgical Team Training.","authors":"Robert J Edmonds, Didier N Hirwantwari, Dallas G Hansen","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usaf062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The optimal size of an austere surgical team needed to perform a damage control surgery has not been established, leading to variability in team composition among the myriad of single surgeon surgical teams within the DoD. The Air Force's conventional Ground Surgical Team (GST) includes 6 members; a surgeon, emergency physician, anesthesia provider, nurse, scrub technician, and medical administrator. The purpose of this study was to establish an evidence base for team composition among single-surgeon surgical teams by evaluating whether the addition of a second nurse would lead to an increase in effectiveness during GST phase 1 course simulations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>During the 2nd week, GST phase 1 training course held at Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, GST students complete 4 high fidelity team-based simulations requiring surgical intervention. The time to first incision was chosen as the primary outcome because of its known impact on patient survival in the unsimulated environment. Secondary outcomes included first full set of vitals, first administration of blood products, and time to call for evacuation. After Institutional Review Board and command approval, baseline control time measurements were obtained during 24 simulations completed by the standard 6-person teams. Time measurements were then obtained during 24 simulations with 7-person teams which included an additional nurse.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Variation was identified in the ability of both 6-person and 7-person teams to complete the measured tasks during the simulation. The addition of a second nurse had no statistical impact on the time to task completion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The variability in \"time to first incision\" among teams during GST phase 1 course demonstrates that certain teams are more efficient in the management of their simulated patients. This study suggests that the addition of a second nurse on GST will not improve the team's efficiency; however, limitations in the study preclude any definitive conclusion. Further research is needed to identify other factors that may impact team efficiency, such as the addition of a member with a different skillset, improvement in nontechnical skills, or an increase in trauma clinical experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usaf062","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The optimal size of an austere surgical team needed to perform a damage control surgery has not been established, leading to variability in team composition among the myriad of single surgeon surgical teams within the DoD. The Air Force's conventional Ground Surgical Team (GST) includes 6 members; a surgeon, emergency physician, anesthesia provider, nurse, scrub technician, and medical administrator. The purpose of this study was to establish an evidence base for team composition among single-surgeon surgical teams by evaluating whether the addition of a second nurse would lead to an increase in effectiveness during GST phase 1 course simulations.

Materials and methods: During the 2nd week, GST phase 1 training course held at Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, GST students complete 4 high fidelity team-based simulations requiring surgical intervention. The time to first incision was chosen as the primary outcome because of its known impact on patient survival in the unsimulated environment. Secondary outcomes included first full set of vitals, first administration of blood products, and time to call for evacuation. After Institutional Review Board and command approval, baseline control time measurements were obtained during 24 simulations completed by the standard 6-person teams. Time measurements were then obtained during 24 simulations with 7-person teams which included an additional nurse.

Results: Variation was identified in the ability of both 6-person and 7-person teams to complete the measured tasks during the simulation. The addition of a second nurse had no statistical impact on the time to task completion.

Conclusions: The variability in "time to first incision" among teams during GST phase 1 course demonstrates that certain teams are more efficient in the management of their simulated patients. This study suggests that the addition of a second nurse on GST will not improve the team's efficiency; however, limitations in the study preclude any definitive conclusion. Further research is needed to identify other factors that may impact team efficiency, such as the addition of a member with a different skillset, improvement in nontechnical skills, or an increase in trauma clinical experience.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Military Medicine
Military Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
393
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Military Medicine is the official international journal of AMSUS. Articles published in the journal are peer-reviewed scientific papers, case reports, and editorials. The journal also publishes letters to the editor. The objective of the journal is to promote awareness of federal medicine by providing a forum for responsible discussion of common ideas and problems relevant to federal healthcare. Its mission is: To increase healthcare education by providing scientific and other information to its readers; to facilitate communication; and to offer a prestige publication for members’ writings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信