Linnaea Schuttner, Jonathan Staloff, Mariah Theis, James D Ralston, Ann-Marie Rosland, Karin Nelson, Laura Coyle, Scott Hagan, Tamara Schult, Traci Solt, Katherine Ritchey, George Sayre
{"title":"Perceived Connections Between Personal Values and Health in High-Risk Patients with Multimorbidity: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Linnaea Schuttner, Jonathan Staloff, Mariah Theis, James D Ralston, Ann-Marie Rosland, Karin Nelson, Laura Coyle, Scott Hagan, Tamara Schult, Traci Solt, Katherine Ritchey, George Sayre","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09448-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aligned with increasing organizational and policy focus on whole person care, particularly for patients with multimorbidity, health systems are operationalizing how to assess what patients find meaningful in life for personalized health planning. Few studies have examined how patients with multimorbidity at high risk of adverse events perceive connections between what is most important in life (i.e., personal values) and health, healthcare, and healthcare decisions. This knowledge is critical to optimizing how, when, and under what circumstances the topics are addressed in healthcare settings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand how high-risk patients with multimorbidity perceive connections between personal values and health, healthcare, and healthcare decisions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients ≥ 75th percentile risk of hospitalization or mortality using a validated prediction score, with ≥ 2 diagnoses among depression, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, or diabetes, engaged in Veterans Health Administration primary care.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>Individual semi-structured telephone interview, analyzed with content analysis.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Patients (N=27) averaged 68 years old; 17 (63%) were male. Three main themes emerged: (1) personal values were rarely discussed in healthcare settings or reflected in healthcare decision-making, sometimes given perceived lower relevance by patients; (2) when personal values were perceived as affecting health decisions, it was within specific contexts or circumstances (e.g., deciding on surgery); (3) eliciting personal values in healthcare settings could have positive or negative consequences, related to conditions of disclosure and resultant action taken in the care plan, and not all patients wanted to disclose values.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, high-risk patients with multimorbidity reported rarely discussing values in healthcare settings, and if so, only perceived relevant connections between values and health in specific contexts. While some participants felt sharing values benefitted care, not all felt comfortable with disclosure. Patient preferences for eliciting and incorporating values are relevant to integrating patient personal values in healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09448-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Aligned with increasing organizational and policy focus on whole person care, particularly for patients with multimorbidity, health systems are operationalizing how to assess what patients find meaningful in life for personalized health planning. Few studies have examined how patients with multimorbidity at high risk of adverse events perceive connections between what is most important in life (i.e., personal values) and health, healthcare, and healthcare decisions. This knowledge is critical to optimizing how, when, and under what circumstances the topics are addressed in healthcare settings.
Objective: To understand how high-risk patients with multimorbidity perceive connections between personal values and health, healthcare, and healthcare decisions.
Design: Qualitative study.
Participants: Patients ≥ 75th percentile risk of hospitalization or mortality using a validated prediction score, with ≥ 2 diagnoses among depression, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, or diabetes, engaged in Veterans Health Administration primary care.
Approach: Individual semi-structured telephone interview, analyzed with content analysis.
Key results: Patients (N=27) averaged 68 years old; 17 (63%) were male. Three main themes emerged: (1) personal values were rarely discussed in healthcare settings or reflected in healthcare decision-making, sometimes given perceived lower relevance by patients; (2) when personal values were perceived as affecting health decisions, it was within specific contexts or circumstances (e.g., deciding on surgery); (3) eliciting personal values in healthcare settings could have positive or negative consequences, related to conditions of disclosure and resultant action taken in the care plan, and not all patients wanted to disclose values.
Conclusions: In this study, high-risk patients with multimorbidity reported rarely discussing values in healthcare settings, and if so, only perceived relevant connections between values and health in specific contexts. While some participants felt sharing values benefitted care, not all felt comfortable with disclosure. Patient preferences for eliciting and incorporating values are relevant to integrating patient personal values in healthcare settings.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.