{"title":"The Effect of Disclosure on Enacted Stigma Towards Individuals with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.","authors":"Chalé M Jacks, Lauren A Stutts","doi":"10.1007/s10880-025-10070-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often experience stigmatization. Disease disclosure has been associated with lower enacted stigma (i.e., engaging in discriminatory treatment), but minimal research has investigated IBD disclosure and enacted stigma experimentally. The present study's aim was to examine the effect of IBD disclosure on enacted stigma in a vignette paradigm. Participants included 244 adults from the United States who were randomized into one of three vignette groups: disclosure of IBD, non-disclosure of IBD, and control (no IBD). Vignettes in both IBD groups depicted a person with frequent bowel movements. Each vignette group contained a workplace, social, and recreational setting. Participants completed measures of enacted stigma, IBD knowledge, and IBD familiarity after reading the vignettes. Participants reported greater propensity to enact stigma in response to vignettes depicting non-disclosure of IBD than vignettes depicting disclosure of IBD or no IBD and for vignettes depicting the recreational setting compared to the workplace and social setting. Enacted stigma was negatively correlated with IBD knowledge. Disease disclosure may result in decreased stigma from others. Furthermore, educating the public about IBD may be beneficial for reducing enacted stigma towards individuals with IBD.</p>","PeriodicalId":15494,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-025-10070-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often experience stigmatization. Disease disclosure has been associated with lower enacted stigma (i.e., engaging in discriminatory treatment), but minimal research has investigated IBD disclosure and enacted stigma experimentally. The present study's aim was to examine the effect of IBD disclosure on enacted stigma in a vignette paradigm. Participants included 244 adults from the United States who were randomized into one of three vignette groups: disclosure of IBD, non-disclosure of IBD, and control (no IBD). Vignettes in both IBD groups depicted a person with frequent bowel movements. Each vignette group contained a workplace, social, and recreational setting. Participants completed measures of enacted stigma, IBD knowledge, and IBD familiarity after reading the vignettes. Participants reported greater propensity to enact stigma in response to vignettes depicting non-disclosure of IBD than vignettes depicting disclosure of IBD or no IBD and for vignettes depicting the recreational setting compared to the workplace and social setting. Enacted stigma was negatively correlated with IBD knowledge. Disease disclosure may result in decreased stigma from others. Furthermore, educating the public about IBD may be beneficial for reducing enacted stigma towards individuals with IBD.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers related to all areas of the science and practice of psychologists in medical settings. Manuscripts are chosen that have a broad appeal across psychology as well as other health care disciplines, reflecting varying backgrounds, interests, and specializations. The journal publishes original research, treatment outcome trials, meta-analyses, literature reviews, conceptual papers, brief scientific reports, and scholarly case studies. Papers accepted address clinical matters in medical settings; integrated care; health disparities; education and training of the future psychology workforce; interdisciplinary collaboration, training, and professionalism; licensing, credentialing, and privileging in hospital practice; research and practice ethics; professional development of psychologists in academic health centers; professional practice matters in medical settings; and cultural, economic, political, regulatory, and systems factors in health care. In summary, the journal provides a forum for papers predicted to have significant theoretical or practical importance for the application of psychology in medical settings.