{"title":"Predicting Postprandial Glycemic Responses With Limited Data in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes.","authors":"Yiheng Shen, Euiji Choi, Samantha Kleinberg","doi":"10.1177/19322968251321508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A core challenge in managing diabetes is predicting glycemic responses to meals. Prior work identified significant interindividual variation in responses and developed personalized forecasts. However, intraindividual variation is still not well understood, and the most accurate approaches require invasive microbiome data. We aimed to investigate (1) whether postprandial glycemic responses (PPGRs) can be predicted with limited data and (2) sources of intraindividual variation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data collected from 397 people with Type 1 Diabetes (T1DEXI) and 100 people with Type 2 Diabetes (ShanghaiT2DM) who wore continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) and logged meals. Using dietary, demographic, and temporal features, we predicted 2 hours PPGR, and peak 2 hours postprandial glucose rise (Glu<sub>max</sub>). We evaluated the contribution of food features (eg, macronutrients, food category) and use of personal training data and investigated intraindividual variability in responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We achieved comparable accuracy to prior work for PPGR (T1DEXI R = 0.61, ShanghaiT2DM R = 0.72) and Glu<sub>max</sub> (T1DEXI R = 0.64, ShanghaiT2DM R = 0.73), without using invasive data like microbiome. Including food category features led to higher accuracy than macronutrients alone. Analysis of glycemic responses to duplicate meals identified time of day (PPGR: T1DEXI <i>P</i> < .05 for lunch, ShanghaiT2DM <i>P</i> < .001 for lunch and dinner) and menstrual cycle (Glu<sub>max</sub>: <i>P</i> < .05 for perimenstrual) as sources of variability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We demonstrate that in individuals with T1D and T2D, glycemic responses to meals can be predicted without personalized training data or invasive physiological data.</p>","PeriodicalId":15475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"19322968251321508"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968251321508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: A core challenge in managing diabetes is predicting glycemic responses to meals. Prior work identified significant interindividual variation in responses and developed personalized forecasts. However, intraindividual variation is still not well understood, and the most accurate approaches require invasive microbiome data. We aimed to investigate (1) whether postprandial glycemic responses (PPGRs) can be predicted with limited data and (2) sources of intraindividual variation.
Methods: We used data collected from 397 people with Type 1 Diabetes (T1DEXI) and 100 people with Type 2 Diabetes (ShanghaiT2DM) who wore continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) and logged meals. Using dietary, demographic, and temporal features, we predicted 2 hours PPGR, and peak 2 hours postprandial glucose rise (Glumax). We evaluated the contribution of food features (eg, macronutrients, food category) and use of personal training data and investigated intraindividual variability in responses.
Results: We achieved comparable accuracy to prior work for PPGR (T1DEXI R = 0.61, ShanghaiT2DM R = 0.72) and Glumax (T1DEXI R = 0.64, ShanghaiT2DM R = 0.73), without using invasive data like microbiome. Including food category features led to higher accuracy than macronutrients alone. Analysis of glycemic responses to duplicate meals identified time of day (PPGR: T1DEXI P < .05 for lunch, ShanghaiT2DM P < .001 for lunch and dinner) and menstrual cycle (Glumax: P < .05 for perimenstrual) as sources of variability.
Conclusions: We demonstrate that in individuals with T1D and T2D, glycemic responses to meals can be predicted without personalized training data or invasive physiological data.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (JDST) is a bi-monthly, peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Diabetes Technology Society. JDST covers scientific and clinical aspects of diabetes technology including glucose monitoring, insulin and metabolic peptide delivery, the artificial pancreas, digital health, precision medicine, social media, cybersecurity, software for modeling, physiologic monitoring, technology for managing obesity, and diagnostic tests of glycation. The journal also covers the development and use of mobile applications and wireless communication, as well as bioengineered tools such as MEMS, new biomaterials, and nanotechnology to develop new sensors. Articles in JDST cover both basic research and clinical applications of technologies being developed to help people with diabetes.