Reham Barghash, Tiffany W Martin, Amber R Prebble, Del Leary
{"title":"Monte Carlo modeling of radiation dose from radiation therapy with superficial x-rays.","authors":"Reham Barghash, Tiffany W Martin, Amber R Prebble, Del Leary","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Superficial x-rays (50-100 kVp) are used for treating non-melanoma skin cancer and intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT). At these energies, the photoelectric effect significantly increases absorbed dose to bone compared to soft tissue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used EGSnrc MC simulations to investigate bone dose enhancement during radiotherapy with the Sensus SRT-100 machine. Simulated beams were validated against laboratory measurements and compared to a commercial treatment planning system (SmART-ATP). Transmission simulations indirectly predicted bone dosage. Simulated beams were utilized as a mock treatment plan from a human cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EGSnrc accurately modeled the Sensus SRT-100 beams (100, 70, and 50 kVp) with a root mean square error (RMSE) of percentage depth dose ratios between Monte Carlo predictions and lab measurements of 1.66, 0.47, and 0.99, respectively. PDDs from simulations of a water phantom with bone slabs showed peak doses at water-bone interfaces relative to surface doses. At 0.3 cm depth bone slab, doses reached 410%, 490%, and 510% for 50, 70, and 100 kVp, respectively. At 1.5 cm depth, doses were 140%, 215%, and 270%. At 2.5 cm depth, peak doses were 74%, 130%, and 170% for 50, 70, and 100 kVp, respectively. A simulated treatment plan (4 Gy surface dose) using a CBCT of a human head predicted the dose to the skull to be around 20, 19, and 15 Gy for the 100, 70, and 50 kVp beams, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study demonstrated EGSnrc's efficiency in conjunction with SmART-ATP for treatment planning. MC simulations effectively quantified bone dose enhancement during superficial x-ray radiotherapy, highlighting its importance in treatment planning and dose calculations. Clinicians should consider measuring bone depth prior to treatment to avoid excessive bone dose.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e70062"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70062","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Superficial x-rays (50-100 kVp) are used for treating non-melanoma skin cancer and intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT). At these energies, the photoelectric effect significantly increases absorbed dose to bone compared to soft tissue.
Methods: We used EGSnrc MC simulations to investigate bone dose enhancement during radiotherapy with the Sensus SRT-100 machine. Simulated beams were validated against laboratory measurements and compared to a commercial treatment planning system (SmART-ATP). Transmission simulations indirectly predicted bone dosage. Simulated beams were utilized as a mock treatment plan from a human cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image.
Results: EGSnrc accurately modeled the Sensus SRT-100 beams (100, 70, and 50 kVp) with a root mean square error (RMSE) of percentage depth dose ratios between Monte Carlo predictions and lab measurements of 1.66, 0.47, and 0.99, respectively. PDDs from simulations of a water phantom with bone slabs showed peak doses at water-bone interfaces relative to surface doses. At 0.3 cm depth bone slab, doses reached 410%, 490%, and 510% for 50, 70, and 100 kVp, respectively. At 1.5 cm depth, doses were 140%, 215%, and 270%. At 2.5 cm depth, peak doses were 74%, 130%, and 170% for 50, 70, and 100 kVp, respectively. A simulated treatment plan (4 Gy surface dose) using a CBCT of a human head predicted the dose to the skull to be around 20, 19, and 15 Gy for the 100, 70, and 50 kVp beams, respectively.
Conclusions: The study demonstrated EGSnrc's efficiency in conjunction with SmART-ATP for treatment planning. MC simulations effectively quantified bone dose enhancement during superficial x-ray radiotherapy, highlighting its importance in treatment planning and dose calculations. Clinicians should consider measuring bone depth prior to treatment to avoid excessive bone dose.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic