Look-alike, sound-alike medication perioperative incidents in a regional Australian hospital: assessment using a novel medication safety culture assessment tool.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Alexandra N Ryan, Kelvin L Robertson, Beverley D Glass
{"title":"Look-alike, sound-alike medication perioperative incidents in a regional Australian hospital: assessment using a novel medication safety culture assessment tool.","authors":"Alexandra N Ryan, Kelvin L Robertson, Beverley D Glass","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medication safety remains a global concern, with governments and organizations striving to mitigate preventable patient harm across healthcare systems. Look-alike, sound-alike medication incidents and the safety culture are widely acknowledged as a contributor to medication errors, particularly within the high-risk perioperative environment. The Medication Safety Culture Indicator Matrix (MedSCIM) is a novel tool developed by the Canadian Institute for Safe Medication Practices to assess the maturity of the medication safety culture. This study aims to delineate look-alike sound-alike (LASA) medication incidents reported in the pharmacy and perioperative settings of an Australian hospital and assess the maturity of the medication safety culture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study setting is within a large regional hospital in Australia, servicing both adult and paediatric populations. Medication incidents from 1 April 2018 to 1 April 2023 were retrospectively gathered from the Clinical Incident Management System, Riskman®. Data and statistical analyses were carried out using Microsoft Excel®. The necessary approvals were secured from the Heath Service Human Research and Ethics Committee.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the 5-year period, a total of 246 (4.1%) of the 6002 medication incidents within the health service were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. Of the 246 medication incidents, 63.0% were identified from the Pharmacy Department, while 22.0% and 15.0% were from the Post Anaesthetic Care Unit and Anaesthetics Department, respectively. The most frequently reported incident classification in both the Anaesthetics Department and Post Anaesthetic Care Unit was 'incorrect dose', followed by 'incorrect medication'. Throughout the 5-year period, 46 (18.7%) of the 246 medication incidents were attributed to look-alike, sound-alike sources of error, predominantly identified in the Pharmacy Department (73.9%), followed by the Anaesthetics Department (17.4%) and the Post Anaesthetic Care Unit (8.7%). High-risk medications were most frequently reported to the Anaesthetics Department. Packaging (packaging alone, naming and packaging, and syringe swaps) was determined to be a contributing factor in 30 (65.2%) of the 46 LASA medication incidents. MedSCIM assessment revealed a reactive medication safety culture. Additionally, the medication incident report documentation was found to be mostly complete or semi-complete.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our analysis delineated medication incidents occurring across the entire medication management cycle and identified incidents related to LASA medications as a contributor to medication incidents across these clinical settings. This novel medication safety culture tool assessment highlighted opportunities for improvement with clinical incident documentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11934547/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaf018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medication safety remains a global concern, with governments and organizations striving to mitigate preventable patient harm across healthcare systems. Look-alike, sound-alike medication incidents and the safety culture are widely acknowledged as a contributor to medication errors, particularly within the high-risk perioperative environment. The Medication Safety Culture Indicator Matrix (MedSCIM) is a novel tool developed by the Canadian Institute for Safe Medication Practices to assess the maturity of the medication safety culture. This study aims to delineate look-alike sound-alike (LASA) medication incidents reported in the pharmacy and perioperative settings of an Australian hospital and assess the maturity of the medication safety culture.

Methods: The study setting is within a large regional hospital in Australia, servicing both adult and paediatric populations. Medication incidents from 1 April 2018 to 1 April 2023 were retrospectively gathered from the Clinical Incident Management System, Riskman®. Data and statistical analyses were carried out using Microsoft Excel®. The necessary approvals were secured from the Heath Service Human Research and Ethics Committee.

Results: During the 5-year period, a total of 246 (4.1%) of the 6002 medication incidents within the health service were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. Of the 246 medication incidents, 63.0% were identified from the Pharmacy Department, while 22.0% and 15.0% were from the Post Anaesthetic Care Unit and Anaesthetics Department, respectively. The most frequently reported incident classification in both the Anaesthetics Department and Post Anaesthetic Care Unit was 'incorrect dose', followed by 'incorrect medication'. Throughout the 5-year period, 46 (18.7%) of the 246 medication incidents were attributed to look-alike, sound-alike sources of error, predominantly identified in the Pharmacy Department (73.9%), followed by the Anaesthetics Department (17.4%) and the Post Anaesthetic Care Unit (8.7%). High-risk medications were most frequently reported to the Anaesthetics Department. Packaging (packaging alone, naming and packaging, and syringe swaps) was determined to be a contributing factor in 30 (65.2%) of the 46 LASA medication incidents. MedSCIM assessment revealed a reactive medication safety culture. Additionally, the medication incident report documentation was found to be mostly complete or semi-complete.

Conclusion: Our analysis delineated medication incidents occurring across the entire medication management cycle and identified incidents related to LASA medications as a contributor to medication incidents across these clinical settings. This novel medication safety culture tool assessment highlighted opportunities for improvement with clinical incident documentation.

外观相似,声音相似的药物在澳大利亚地区医院围手术期事件:使用一种新的药物安全文化评估工具进行评估。
背景:药物安全仍然是一个全球关注的问题,各国政府和组织努力减轻整个医疗保健系统中可预防的患者伤害。外观相似,声音相似的药物事件和安全文化被广泛认为是导致药物错误的原因,特别是在高危的围手术期环境中。用药安全文化指标矩阵是加拿大安全用药实践研究所开发的一种新工具,用于评估用药安全文化的成熟度。本研究旨在描述在澳大利亚一家医院的药房和围手术期环境中报告的相似声音相似(LASA)用药事件,并评估用药安全文化的成熟度。方法:研究设置在澳大利亚的一家大型地区医院,为成人和儿科人群提供服务。2018年4月1日至2023年4月1日的用药事件回顾性收集自临床事件管理系统Riskman®。使用Microsoft Excel®进行数据和统计分析。必要的批准已从卫生服务人类研究和伦理委员会获得。结果:5年期间,卫生服务部门发生的6002起用药事件中,有246起(4.1%)符合纳入标准。246起用药事故中,63.0%发生在药学部门,22.0%发生在麻醉后护理病房,15.0%发生在麻醉科。麻醉科和麻醉后护理病房最常见的事件分类是“剂量不正确”,其次是“用药不正确”。在这5年期间,246起用药事件中有46起(18.7%)是由于相似、声音相似的错误来源造成的,主要发生在药剂科(73.9%),其次是麻醉科(17.4%)和麻醉后护理病房(8.7%)。高危药物是最常报告给麻醉科的。在46例LASA用药事件中,包装(单独包装、命名和包装以及注射器互换)被确定为30例(65.2%)的影响因素。用药安全文化指标矩阵评价显示出反应性用药安全文化。此外,发现药物事件报告文件大多完整或半完整。结论:我们的分析描述了整个用药管理周期中发生的用药事件,并确定了与LASA药物相关的事件是这些临床环境中用药事件的一个贡献者。这种新颖的药物安全文化工具评估强调了临床事件记录改进的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.80%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Quality in Health Care makes activities and research related to quality and safety in health care available to a worldwide readership. The Journal publishes papers in all disciplines related to the quality and safety of health care, including health services research, health care evaluation, technology assessment, health economics, utilization review, cost containment, and nursing care research, as well as clinical research related to quality of care. This peer-reviewed journal is truly interdisciplinary and includes contributions from representatives of all health professions such as doctors, nurses, quality assurance professionals, managers, politicians, social workers, and therapists, as well as researchers from health-related backgrounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信