Comparison of Complex Open Domain Electrical Impedance Tomography Methods.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Allaire F Doussan, Ethan K Murphy, Sophie A Lloyd, Ryan J Halter
{"title":"Comparison of Complex Open Domain Electrical Impedance Tomography Methods.","authors":"Allaire F Doussan, Ethan K Murphy, Sophie A Lloyd, Ryan J Halter","doi":"10.1109/TBME.2025.3547239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates the potential of complex 3D Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) for intraoperative surgical margin assessment (SMA) using an ex vivo bovine model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A custom electrode array was used to collect impedance data across multiple frequencies (100 Hz - 1 MHz) from 57 tissue samples. An optimal pressure range was identified to ensure proper electrode contact with minimal tissue deformation (2 kPa to 5 kPa) and a saline calibration was used to minimize model-data mismatch. A novel best fit factor, β, was introduced to scale the reference data of difference EIT and initial guess for absolute EIT to eliminate inversions in permittivity. The accuracy of complex EIT reconstructions were investigated using pixel-based tissue classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Experimental difference EIT, particularly for conductivity (s) at 100 Hz, achieved high sensitivity (0.92) and specificity (0.90) with fast reconstruction speeds of 1.67 seconds. While absolute EIT performed slightly better in quantitative metrics for s imaging (AUC = 0.90, Accuracy = 0.86), difference EIT was found to be more suitable for real-time applications due to its faster processing time. Simulations suggested that permittivity (ϵ) has sufficient contrast for classifying muscle and adipose tissue. However, experimental ϵ reconstructions exhibited lower performance, suggesting the need for hardware improvements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Difference EIT is the most promising method for real-time applications, balancing high accuracy with reconstruction speeds. Absolute EIT, while slightly more accurate, is less feasible due to longer processing times (150.6 seconds).</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>This study advances the potential for real-time intraoperative SMA using a novel complex EIT reconstruction method.</p>","PeriodicalId":13245,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2025.3547239","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluates the potential of complex 3D Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) for intraoperative surgical margin assessment (SMA) using an ex vivo bovine model.

Methods: A custom electrode array was used to collect impedance data across multiple frequencies (100 Hz - 1 MHz) from 57 tissue samples. An optimal pressure range was identified to ensure proper electrode contact with minimal tissue deformation (2 kPa to 5 kPa) and a saline calibration was used to minimize model-data mismatch. A novel best fit factor, β, was introduced to scale the reference data of difference EIT and initial guess for absolute EIT to eliminate inversions in permittivity. The accuracy of complex EIT reconstructions were investigated using pixel-based tissue classification.

Results: Experimental difference EIT, particularly for conductivity (s) at 100 Hz, achieved high sensitivity (0.92) and specificity (0.90) with fast reconstruction speeds of 1.67 seconds. While absolute EIT performed slightly better in quantitative metrics for s imaging (AUC = 0.90, Accuracy = 0.86), difference EIT was found to be more suitable for real-time applications due to its faster processing time. Simulations suggested that permittivity (ϵ) has sufficient contrast for classifying muscle and adipose tissue. However, experimental ϵ reconstructions exhibited lower performance, suggesting the need for hardware improvements.

Conclusion: Difference EIT is the most promising method for real-time applications, balancing high accuracy with reconstruction speeds. Absolute EIT, while slightly more accurate, is less feasible due to longer processing times (150.6 seconds).

Significance: This study advances the potential for real-time intraoperative SMA using a novel complex EIT reconstruction method.

复开域电阻抗层析成像方法的比较。
目的:本研究利用离体牛模型,评估复杂三维电阻抗断层扫描(EIT)在术中手术切缘评估(SMA)中的应用潜力。方法:采用定制电极阵列收集57个组织样本的多个频率(100 Hz - 1 MHz)阻抗数据。确定了最佳压力范围,以确保适当的电极接触和最小的组织变形(2kpa至5kpa),并使用生理盐水校准以最大限度地减少模型数据不匹配。为了消除介电常数的反演,引入了一种新的最佳拟合因子β来对差分电阻抗参考数据和绝对电阻抗初始猜测进行尺度化。采用基于像素的组织分类方法研究了复杂EIT重建的准确性。结果:实验差分EIT,特别是在100 Hz下的电导率(s),具有较高的灵敏度(0.92)和特异性(0.90),重建速度为1.67秒。虽然绝对EIT在s成像的定量指标上表现稍好(AUC = 0.90,精度= 0.86),但由于处理时间更快,差异EIT更适合于实时应用。模拟表明,介电常数(ε)有足够的对比度来区分肌肉和脂肪组织。然而,实验重建的λ表现出较低的性能,这表明需要改进硬件。结论:差分EIT在高准确度和重建速度之间取得了平衡,是最有前途的实时应用方法。绝对EIT虽然稍微准确一些,但由于处理时间较长(150.6秒),因此不太可行。意义:本研究利用一种新的复杂EIT重建方法,提高了术中实时SMA的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
880
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering contains basic and applied papers dealing with biomedical engineering. Papers range from engineering development in methods and techniques with biomedical applications to experimental and clinical investigations with engineering contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信