Development & evaluation of a training programme to address complex post-COVID psychological needs.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Aruna Laxmy, Himani Kashyap, Rajakumari P Reddy, Manoj Kumar Sharma, Paulomi Matam Sudhir, K S Meena
{"title":"Development & evaluation of a training programme to address complex post-COVID psychological needs.","authors":"Aruna Laxmy, Himani Kashyap, Rajakumari P Reddy, Manoj Kumar Sharma, Paulomi Matam Sudhir, K S Meena","doi":"10.25259/IJMR_416_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background & objectives In India, mental health treatment gaps are significant, and related to shortage of trained personnel. Published literature has identified gaps in existing training programmes including - delivering psychological interventions for complex concerns such as intensified post-COVID grief, trauma, suicidality; ongoing mentoring; and culture-sensitive interventions. Despite government initiatives, gaps in treatment and training have been compounded by a surge in psychological distress following COVID-19. This study aimed to develop, implement and evaluate a training programme for psychologists to identify, assess, and treat complex post-COVID psychological concerns. Methods The study employed a sequential mixed exploratory research design with tailored programme development (Phase I) and programme delivery with pre-post evaluations of participation, satisfaction, learning and competence using Moore's framework (Phase II). Psychologists with postgraduate qualifications, engaged in direct client contact were invited through flyers to participate in the free online training programme. Results The final programme included ten modules; with knowledge, skills, and application components; comprising synchronous and asynchronous elements. Fifty-three participants enrolled in the programme and 70 per cent completed the course. Pre-post evaluations indicated high satisfaction (93.54% rated as met/exceeded expectations); improvements in competence (pre training mode = 3; post-training mode = 4); and average to above average learning scores (mean scores ≥3 on 7 out of 9 module quizzes). Participant feedback revealed that the focus on complex concerns, practical learning through interactive sessions and role play recordings, and case-based supervision were helpful. Interpretation & conclusions The programme focused on training gaps identified through a needs assessment survey. It was received well in terms of participation, satisfaction, content, accessibility and learning. The indigenous and skill-focused training has implications to contribute to future mental health preparedness and scope for large-scale deployment.</p>","PeriodicalId":13349,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","volume":"161 1","pages":"43-53"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878672/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/IJMR_416_2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & objectives In India, mental health treatment gaps are significant, and related to shortage of trained personnel. Published literature has identified gaps in existing training programmes including - delivering psychological interventions for complex concerns such as intensified post-COVID grief, trauma, suicidality; ongoing mentoring; and culture-sensitive interventions. Despite government initiatives, gaps in treatment and training have been compounded by a surge in psychological distress following COVID-19. This study aimed to develop, implement and evaluate a training programme for psychologists to identify, assess, and treat complex post-COVID psychological concerns. Methods The study employed a sequential mixed exploratory research design with tailored programme development (Phase I) and programme delivery with pre-post evaluations of participation, satisfaction, learning and competence using Moore's framework (Phase II). Psychologists with postgraduate qualifications, engaged in direct client contact were invited through flyers to participate in the free online training programme. Results The final programme included ten modules; with knowledge, skills, and application components; comprising synchronous and asynchronous elements. Fifty-three participants enrolled in the programme and 70 per cent completed the course. Pre-post evaluations indicated high satisfaction (93.54% rated as met/exceeded expectations); improvements in competence (pre training mode = 3; post-training mode = 4); and average to above average learning scores (mean scores ≥3 on 7 out of 9 module quizzes). Participant feedback revealed that the focus on complex concerns, practical learning through interactive sessions and role play recordings, and case-based supervision were helpful. Interpretation & conclusions The programme focused on training gaps identified through a needs assessment survey. It was received well in terms of participation, satisfaction, content, accessibility and learning. The indigenous and skill-focused training has implications to contribute to future mental health preparedness and scope for large-scale deployment.

制定和评估培训计划,以解决复杂的后covid心理需求。
背景与目标在印度,精神卫生治疗差距很大,这与训练有素的人员短缺有关。已发表的文献指出了现有培训规划中的差距,包括为复杂问题提供心理干预措施,如covid后悲伤、创伤和自杀倾向加剧;正在进行指导;文化敏感干预。尽管政府采取了一些举措,但COVID-19后心理困扰的激增加剧了治疗和培训方面的差距。本研究旨在为心理学家制定、实施和评估一项培训计划,以识别、评估和治疗复杂的后covid心理问题。方法采用顺序混合探索性研究设计,采用量身定制的项目开发(第一阶段)和项目交付(第二阶段),采用摩尔框架对参与、满意度、学习和能力进行前后评估。通过宣传单邀请直接与客户接触的具有研究生资格的心理学家参加免费在线培训项目。结果最终方案包括10个模块;具备知识、技能和应用组件;包括同步和异步元素。53名学员参加了该方案,70%的学员完成了课程。事后评价满意度较高(93.54%认为达到/超过预期);能力提升(预训练模式= 3;训练后模式= 4);学习成绩平均或高于平均水平(9个模块测验中有7个模块的平均成绩≥3)。参加者的反馈显示,关注复杂问题、通过互动会议和角色扮演录音进行实际学习,以及以个案为基础的监督都是有帮助的。解释和结论该方案侧重于通过需求评估调查确定的培训差距。它在参与、满意度、内容、可及性和学习方面都得到了很好的评价。土著和以技能为重点的培训有助于今后的心理健康准备和大规模部署的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
191
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Medical Research (IJMR) [ISSN 0971-5916] is one of the oldest medical Journals not only in India, but probably in Asia, as it started in the year 1913. The Journal was started as a quarterly (4 issues/year) in 1913 and made bimonthly (6 issues/year) in 1958. It became monthly (12 issues/year) in the year 1964.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信