Evaluation of a second-generation intercostal extravascular implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead with a pectoral pulse generator for sensing, defibrillation, and anti-tachycardia pacing.

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Europace Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1093/europace/euaf044
Shephal K Doshi, Reinoud E Knops, Adrian Ebner, Michael Husby, Alan Marcovecchio, Rick Sanghera, Don Scheck, Martin C Burke
{"title":"Evaluation of a second-generation intercostal extravascular implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead with a pectoral pulse generator for sensing, defibrillation, and anti-tachycardia pacing.","authors":"Shephal K Doshi, Reinoud E Knops, Adrian Ebner, Michael Husby, Alan Marcovecchio, Rick Sanghera, Don Scheck, Martin C Burke","doi":"10.1093/europace/euaf044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Intercostal extravascular implantable cardioverter defibrillator (EV-ICD) leads may work better in contact with the pericardium thereby directing pacing and defibrillation energy towards excitable myocytes. We report 3-month safety and performance outcomes with a second-generation intercostal EV-ICD lead paired with standard, commercially available ICD pulse generators (PGs).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Subjects undergoing a transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) procedure received a concomitant intercostal EV-ICD lead system. The intercostal EV-ICD lead was connected sequentially to a PG in a left pectoral and then a left mid-axillary location. Extravascular ICD lead assessment included sensing and defibrillation of induced ventricular arrhythmias and pacing capture. The intercostal EV-ICD system was followed in a 'recording-only' mode and the control TV-ICD system in 'therapy delivery' mode to compare stored events. Devices were evaluated prior to hospital discharge, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months post-implant. Defibrillation testing was repeated prior to lead removal; 20/20 (100%) were successfully implanted (median implant time of 9 min). Two major lead complications were reported over a mean of 82 days: (i) lead movement and (ii) infection of both the TV-ICD and EV-ICD systems. Intraoperative pacing capture was achieved with the integrated bipolar configuration in 19 of 20 (95%) subjects. Pacing capture with the EV-ICD system was tolerated in all subjects, with over 90% feeling no pain after a 1-month recovery from the procedure. Induced VF episodes were sensed in all subjects and defibrillated successfully in 17 of 17 patients (100%) with a left mid-axillary PG and 19 of 20 patients (95%) with a left pectoral PG. Sensing and defibrillation were successful in 18 of 18 (100%) tested prior to lead removal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this pilot experience with a second-generation intercostal EV-ICD lead implantation, sensing and defibrillation of induced VF were successful when paired with a standard ICD PG from either a left mid-axillary or pectoral pocket.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT number: NCT05791032; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05791032.</p>","PeriodicalId":11981,"journal":{"name":"Europace","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11928788/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europace","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf044","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Intercostal extravascular implantable cardioverter defibrillator (EV-ICD) leads may work better in contact with the pericardium thereby directing pacing and defibrillation energy towards excitable myocytes. We report 3-month safety and performance outcomes with a second-generation intercostal EV-ICD lead paired with standard, commercially available ICD pulse generators (PGs).

Methods and results: Subjects undergoing a transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) procedure received a concomitant intercostal EV-ICD lead system. The intercostal EV-ICD lead was connected sequentially to a PG in a left pectoral and then a left mid-axillary location. Extravascular ICD lead assessment included sensing and defibrillation of induced ventricular arrhythmias and pacing capture. The intercostal EV-ICD system was followed in a 'recording-only' mode and the control TV-ICD system in 'therapy delivery' mode to compare stored events. Devices were evaluated prior to hospital discharge, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months post-implant. Defibrillation testing was repeated prior to lead removal; 20/20 (100%) were successfully implanted (median implant time of 9 min). Two major lead complications were reported over a mean of 82 days: (i) lead movement and (ii) infection of both the TV-ICD and EV-ICD systems. Intraoperative pacing capture was achieved with the integrated bipolar configuration in 19 of 20 (95%) subjects. Pacing capture with the EV-ICD system was tolerated in all subjects, with over 90% feeling no pain after a 1-month recovery from the procedure. Induced VF episodes were sensed in all subjects and defibrillated successfully in 17 of 17 patients (100%) with a left mid-axillary PG and 19 of 20 patients (95%) with a left pectoral PG. Sensing and defibrillation were successful in 18 of 18 (100%) tested prior to lead removal.

Conclusion: In this pilot experience with a second-generation intercostal EV-ICD lead implantation, sensing and defibrillation of induced VF were successful when paired with a standard ICD PG from either a left mid-axillary or pectoral pocket.

Clinical trial registration: NCT number: NCT05791032; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05791032.

第二代肋间血管外ICD导联与胸脉发生器用于感应、除颤和抗心动过速起搏的评价。
背景:肋间EV-ICD导联与心包接触可能效果更好,从而将起搏和除颤能量引导至可兴奋的肌细胞。我们报告了将第二代肋间EV-ICD导联与标准的市售ICD脉冲发生器(pg)配对后三个月的安全性和性能结果。方法:接受经静脉ICD (TV-ICD)手术的受试者同时接受肋间EV-ICD导联系统。肋间EV-ICD导联依次连接到左胸和左腋中位置的PG。EV-ICD导联评估包括感应和除颤诱发性室性心律失常(IVA)和起搏捕捉。肋间EV-ICD系统采用“仅记录”模式,对照TV-ICD系统采用“治疗传递”模式,比较存储的事件。在出院前、植入后2周、1个月、2个月和3个月对设备进行评估。除颤试验在取铅前重复进行。结果:20/20(100%)成功种植(中位种植时间9分钟)。在平均82天内报告了两种主要的导联并发症:(1)导联移动和(2)TV-ICD和EV-ICD系统感染。20例(95%)受试者中有19例(95%)实现了术中起搏捕获。所有受试者都能耐受EV-ICD系统的起搏捕捉,超过90%的患者在术后一个月恢复后没有感到疼痛。在所有受试者中,17例左腋中PG患者中有17例(100%)和20例左胸PG患者中有19例(95%)都能感应到诱发的VF发作,并成功除颤。在引线去除之前,18例患者中有18例(100%)检测到诱发性VF发作并成功除颤。结论:在第二代肋间导联植入术的试点经验中,当与左侧腋下或胸间口袋的标准ICD PG配对时,诱导的VF传感和除颤是成功的。研究标识:NCT编号:NCT05791032, URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05791032。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Europace
Europace 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
8.20%
发文量
851
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: EP - Europace - European Journal of Pacing, Arrhythmias and Cardiac Electrophysiology of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology. The journal aims to provide an avenue of communication of top quality European and international original scientific work and reviews in the fields of Arrhythmias, Pacing and Cellular Electrophysiology. The Journal offers the reader a collection of contemporary original peer-reviewed papers, invited papers and editorial comments together with book reviews and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信