Silin Su, Kai Ma, Tianhong Zhou, Yuting Yao, Huijuan Xin
{"title":"Advancing methodologies for assessing the impact of land use changes on water quality: a comprehensive review and recommendations.","authors":"Silin Su, Kai Ma, Tianhong Zhou, Yuting Yao, Huijuan Xin","doi":"10.1007/s10653-025-02413-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With increasing scholarly focus on the ramifications of land use changes on water quality, although substantial research has been undertaken, the findings demonstrate pronounced spatial variability and the heterogeneity of research methodologies. To address this critical gap, this review offers a rigorous evaluation of the strengths and limitations of current research methodologies, providing targeted recommendations for refinement. It systematically assesses the existing body of literature concerning the influence of land use changes on water quality, with particular emphasis on the spatial heterogeneity of research results and the uniformity of employed methodologies. Despite variations in geographical contexts and research subjects, the methodological paradigms remain largely consistent, typically encompassing the acquisition and analysis of water quality and land use data, the delineation of buffer zones, and the application of correlation and regression analyses. However, these approaches encounter limitations in addressing regional disparities, nonlinear interactions, and real-time monitoring complexities. The review advocates for methodological advancements, such as the integration of automated monitoring systems and IoT technologies, alongside the fusion of deep learning algorithms with remote sensing techniques, to enhance both the precision and efficiency of data collection. Furthermore, it recommends the standardization of buffer zone delineation, the reinforcement of foundational water quality assessments, and the utilization of catchment-scale analyses to more accurately capture the influence of land use changes on water quality. Future inquiries should prioritize the development of interdisciplinary ecological models to elucidate the interaction and feedback mechanisms between land use, water quality, and climate change.</p>","PeriodicalId":11759,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Geochemistry and Health","volume":"47 4","pages":"101"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Geochemistry and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-025-02413-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With increasing scholarly focus on the ramifications of land use changes on water quality, although substantial research has been undertaken, the findings demonstrate pronounced spatial variability and the heterogeneity of research methodologies. To address this critical gap, this review offers a rigorous evaluation of the strengths and limitations of current research methodologies, providing targeted recommendations for refinement. It systematically assesses the existing body of literature concerning the influence of land use changes on water quality, with particular emphasis on the spatial heterogeneity of research results and the uniformity of employed methodologies. Despite variations in geographical contexts and research subjects, the methodological paradigms remain largely consistent, typically encompassing the acquisition and analysis of water quality and land use data, the delineation of buffer zones, and the application of correlation and regression analyses. However, these approaches encounter limitations in addressing regional disparities, nonlinear interactions, and real-time monitoring complexities. The review advocates for methodological advancements, such as the integration of automated monitoring systems and IoT technologies, alongside the fusion of deep learning algorithms with remote sensing techniques, to enhance both the precision and efficiency of data collection. Furthermore, it recommends the standardization of buffer zone delineation, the reinforcement of foundational water quality assessments, and the utilization of catchment-scale analyses to more accurately capture the influence of land use changes on water quality. Future inquiries should prioritize the development of interdisciplinary ecological models to elucidate the interaction and feedback mechanisms between land use, water quality, and climate change.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Geochemistry and Health publishes original research papers and review papers across the broad field of environmental geochemistry. Environmental geochemistry and health establishes and explains links between the natural or disturbed chemical composition of the earth’s surface and the health of plants, animals and people.
Beneficial elements regulate or promote enzymatic and hormonal activity whereas other elements may be toxic. Bedrock geochemistry controls the composition of soil and hence that of water and vegetation. Environmental issues, such as pollution, arising from the extraction and use of mineral resources, are discussed. The effects of contaminants introduced into the earth’s geochemical systems are examined. Geochemical surveys of soil, water and plants show how major and trace elements are distributed geographically. Associated epidemiological studies reveal the possibility of causal links between the natural or disturbed geochemical environment and disease. Experimental research illuminates the nature or consequences of natural or disturbed geochemical processes.
The journal particularly welcomes novel research linking environmental geochemistry and health issues on such topics as: heavy metals (including mercury), persistent organic pollutants (POPs), and mixed chemicals emitted through human activities, such as uncontrolled recycling of electronic-waste; waste recycling; surface-atmospheric interaction processes (natural and anthropogenic emissions, vertical transport, deposition, and physical-chemical interaction) of gases and aerosols; phytoremediation/restoration of contaminated sites; food contamination and safety; environmental effects of medicines; effects and toxicity of mixed pollutants; speciation of heavy metals/metalloids; effects of mining; disturbed geochemistry from human behavior, natural or man-made hazards; particle and nanoparticle toxicology; risk and the vulnerability of populations, etc.