Isotope dilution-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based candidate reference measurement procedures for the quantification of 24(R),25-dihydroxyvitamin D2 and 24(R),25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in human serum and plasma.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Kerstin Kandler, Michael Stadlmeier, Neeraj Singh, Friederike Bauland, Andrea Geistanger, Christian Geletneky, Judith Taibon
{"title":"Isotope dilution-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based candidate reference measurement procedures for the quantification of 24<i>(R)</i>,25-dihydroxyvitamin D2 and 24<i>(R)</i>,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in human serum and plasma.","authors":"Kerstin Kandler, Michael Stadlmeier, Neeraj Singh, Friederike Bauland, Andrea Geistanger, Christian Geletneky, Judith Taibon","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2024-1139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Isotope dilution-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC MS/MS)-based candidate reference measurement procedures (RMPs) for the quantification of 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D2 and 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D3 in human serum and plasma are presented.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (qNMR) spectroscopic methodology was utilized to assign absolute content (g/g) and SI-traceability to reference materials used as primary calibrators. For liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis a two-dimensional heart cut LC approach, in combination with a supported liquid extraction protocol, was established to mitigate matrix effects and prevent co-elution of interferences. Selectivity was determined by spiking the internal standards and similar compounds, in human serum. A post-column infusion experiment and comparison of standard line slopes was performed to evaluate matrix effects. Precision and accuracy were assessed via a multi-day validation experiment, utilizing certified secondary reference materials from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Measurement uncertainty (MU) was evaluated per the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM). To demonstrate equivalence with the JCTLM-listed RMP, certified secondary reference materials were utilized. Additionally, a method comparison study was conducted with the 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D3 method used by the CDC Vitamin D Reference Laboratory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RMP allowed quantification of 24,25(OH)2D2 and 24,25(OH)2D3 within the range of 0.150-18.0 ng/mL (0.350-42.0 nmol/L 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D2 and 0.360-43.2 nmol/L 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D3) without interference from structurally-related compounds and no evidence of matrix effects. Intermediate precision was ≤2.3 % for 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D2 and ≤2.9 % for 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D3; repeatability was ≤1.4 % for 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D2 and ≤2.1 % for 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D3, across all concentration levels. The relative mean bias was -4.5 to 2.9 % for 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D2, and -3.7 to 3.6 % for 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D3. Expanded MU for reference value assignment for 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D2 and 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D3 for reference value assignment was ≤2.5 %, regardless of concentration level and sample type. Passing-Bablok regression revealed strong agreement between the 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D3 results from the candidate RMPs and those provided by the CDC Vitamin D Reference Laboratory.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These RMPs permit accurate and reproducible determination of 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D2 and 24,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D3. Implementation of these methods supports routine assay standardization and patient sample measurement with confirmed traceability.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-1139","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Isotope dilution-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC MS/MS)-based candidate reference measurement procedures (RMPs) for the quantification of 24,25(OH)2D2 and 24,25(OH)2D3 in human serum and plasma are presented.

Methods: Quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (qNMR) spectroscopic methodology was utilized to assign absolute content (g/g) and SI-traceability to reference materials used as primary calibrators. For liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis a two-dimensional heart cut LC approach, in combination with a supported liquid extraction protocol, was established to mitigate matrix effects and prevent co-elution of interferences. Selectivity was determined by spiking the internal standards and similar compounds, in human serum. A post-column infusion experiment and comparison of standard line slopes was performed to evaluate matrix effects. Precision and accuracy were assessed via a multi-day validation experiment, utilizing certified secondary reference materials from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Measurement uncertainty (MU) was evaluated per the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM). To demonstrate equivalence with the JCTLM-listed RMP, certified secondary reference materials were utilized. Additionally, a method comparison study was conducted with the 24,25(OH)2D3 method used by the CDC Vitamin D Reference Laboratory.

Results: The RMP allowed quantification of 24,25(OH)2D2 and 24,25(OH)2D3 within the range of 0.150-18.0 ng/mL (0.350-42.0 nmol/L 24,25(OH)2D2 and 0.360-43.2 nmol/L 24,25(OH)2D3) without interference from structurally-related compounds and no evidence of matrix effects. Intermediate precision was ≤2.3 % for 24,25(OH)2D2 and ≤2.9 % for 24,25(OH)2D3; repeatability was ≤1.4 % for 24,25(OH)2D2 and ≤2.1 % for 24,25(OH)2D3, across all concentration levels. The relative mean bias was -4.5 to 2.9 % for 24,25(OH)2D2, and -3.7 to 3.6 % for 24,25(OH)2D3. Expanded MU for reference value assignment for 24,25(OH)2D2 and 24,25(OH)2D3 for reference value assignment was ≤2.5 %, regardless of concentration level and sample type. Passing-Bablok regression revealed strong agreement between the 24,25(OH)2D3 results from the candidate RMPs and those provided by the CDC Vitamin D Reference Laboratory.

Conclusions: These RMPs permit accurate and reproducible determination of 24,25(OH)2D2 and 24,25(OH)2D3. Implementation of these methods supports routine assay standardization and patient sample measurement with confirmed traceability.

基于同位素稀释-液相色谱-串联质谱的候选参考测量方法定量人血清和血浆中24(R),25-二羟维生素D2和24(R),25-二羟维生素D3。
目的:建立基于同位素稀释-液相色谱-串联质谱(ID-LC MS/MS)的人血清和血浆中24,25(OH)2D2和24,25(OH)2D3的候选参考测量方法(RMPs)。方法:采用定量核磁共振(qNMR)光谱方法对作为主要校准器的标准物质进行绝对含量(g/g)和si可追溯性测定。对于液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)分析,建立了一种二维心形切割LC方法,结合支持的液体提取方案,以减轻基质效应并防止干扰的共洗脱。选择性是通过在人血清中加入内标物和类似化合物来确定的。通过柱后灌注实验和标准线斜率的比较来评价基质效应。精密度和准确度通过一个多天的验证实验进行评估,使用来自美国国家标准与技术研究所(NIST)认证的二级参考物质。测量不确定度(MU)根据测量不确定度表达指南(GUM)进行评估。为了证明与jctlm所列RMP的等效性,使用了经过认证的二级标准物质。此外,还与CDC维生素D参考实验室使用的24,25(OH)2D3方法进行了方法比较研究。结果:RMP可在0.150 ~ 18.0 ng/mL(0.350 ~ 42.0 nmol/L 24,25(OH)2D2和0.360 ~ 43.2 nmol/L 24,25(OH)2D3)范围内定量,无结构相关化合物干扰,无基质效应。24,25(OH)2D2的中间精密度≤2.3 %,24,25(OH)2D3的中间精密度≤2.9 %;在所有浓度水平下,24,25(OH)2D2的重复性≤1.4 %,24,25(OH)2D3的重复性≤2.1 %。24,25(OH)2D2的相对平均偏倚为-4.5至2.9 %,24,25(OH)2D3的相对平均偏倚为-3.7至3.6 %。无论浓度水平和样品类型如何,24,25(OH)2D2和24,25(OH)2D3的参考值分配的扩展MU≤2.5 %。pass - bablok回归显示候选RMPs的24,25(OH)2D3结果与CDC维生素D参考实验室提供的结果非常一致。结论:所建立的RMPs能够准确、重复性地测定24,25(OH)2D2和24,25(OH)2D3。这些方法的实施支持常规分析标准化和患者样本测量,并确认可追溯性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
16.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically. CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France). Topics: - clinical biochemistry - clinical genomics and molecular biology - clinical haematology and coagulation - clinical immunology and autoimmunity - clinical microbiology - drug monitoring and analysis - evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers - disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes) - new reagents, instrumentation and technologies - new methodologies - reference materials and methods - reference values and decision limits - quality and safety in laboratory medicine - translational laboratory medicine - clinical metrology Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信