Robotic multidisciplinary endometriosis surgery with multi-visceral resection: evaluation of short-term feasibility and safety outcomes.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Joseph Do Woong Choi, Lauren Hofmann, Andrew Craig Lynch, Assad Zahid, Praveen Ravindran, Walid Barto, Yogesh Nikam, Stephen Pillinger
{"title":"Robotic multidisciplinary endometriosis surgery with multi-visceral resection: evaluation of short-term feasibility and safety outcomes.","authors":"Joseph Do Woong Choi, Lauren Hofmann, Andrew Craig Lynch, Assad Zahid, Praveen Ravindran, Walid Barto, Yogesh Nikam, Stephen Pillinger","doi":"10.1111/ans.70058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite growing interest in robot-assisted surgery, the literature remains limited on the application of robotic surgery for complex endometriosis surgery requiring multidisciplinary input for multi-visceral resection. The aim of the study was to report the short-term feasibility and safety outcomes of this technique from a high-volume robotic surgery facility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single centre, retrospective study evaluating prospectively collected data. All women underwent planned multidisciplinary robotic surgery using the da Vinci Xi system between January 2018 and July 2024. Fifty-eight patients were included in the analysis of demographic, operative and 30-day postoperative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age was 40.5 (range 21-55), with 94.82% of women having ASRM grade 3-4 endometriosis. Almost half of the patients had total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingectomy. Concurrent colorectal resections included appendicectomy/stapled caecectomy (41.38%), rectal shaving (36.21%), rectal wedge resection (39.66%), endo-anal discoid resection (1.72%) and rectal segmental resection (15.52%). Partial bladder excision and extensive ureterolysis for ureteral stenosis occurred in 5.17% and 11.54%, respectively. The median console time was 148 min (range 49-480 min), 0% conversions and a median 100mls estimated blood loss. Median length of stay was 3 days (range 1-7). Clavien-Dindo complications ≥2 occurred 5.17% of cases. There were no anastomotic leaks, other infectious complications, postoperative ileus, blood transfusion requirements or mortality within 30 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The robotic assisted approach is feasible and safe with overall short operative time, acceptable blood loss, no conversions, relatively short length of stay and minimal short term postoperative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite growing interest in robot-assisted surgery, the literature remains limited on the application of robotic surgery for complex endometriosis surgery requiring multidisciplinary input for multi-visceral resection. The aim of the study was to report the short-term feasibility and safety outcomes of this technique from a high-volume robotic surgery facility.

Methods: This was a single centre, retrospective study evaluating prospectively collected data. All women underwent planned multidisciplinary robotic surgery using the da Vinci Xi system between January 2018 and July 2024. Fifty-eight patients were included in the analysis of demographic, operative and 30-day postoperative data.

Results: The median age was 40.5 (range 21-55), with 94.82% of women having ASRM grade 3-4 endometriosis. Almost half of the patients had total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingectomy. Concurrent colorectal resections included appendicectomy/stapled caecectomy (41.38%), rectal shaving (36.21%), rectal wedge resection (39.66%), endo-anal discoid resection (1.72%) and rectal segmental resection (15.52%). Partial bladder excision and extensive ureterolysis for ureteral stenosis occurred in 5.17% and 11.54%, respectively. The median console time was 148 min (range 49-480 min), 0% conversions and a median 100mls estimated blood loss. Median length of stay was 3 days (range 1-7). Clavien-Dindo complications ≥2 occurred 5.17% of cases. There were no anastomotic leaks, other infectious complications, postoperative ileus, blood transfusion requirements or mortality within 30 days.

Conclusions: The robotic assisted approach is feasible and safe with overall short operative time, acceptable blood loss, no conversions, relatively short length of stay and minimal short term postoperative complications.

机器人多学科子宫内膜异位症手术多脏器切除:短期可行性和安全性评估结果。
背景:尽管人们对机器人辅助手术越来越感兴趣,但在需要多学科输入进行多脏器切除的复杂子宫内膜异位症手术中,机器人手术的应用文献仍然有限。该研究的目的是报告该技术在大规模机器人手术设施中的短期可行性和安全性结果。方法:这是一项单中心、回顾性研究,对前瞻性收集的数据进行评估。2018年1月至2024年7月期间,所有女性都计划使用达芬奇Xi系统进行多学科机器人手术。58例患者被纳入人口统计学、手术和术后30天数据分析。结果:中位年龄为40.5岁(范围21-55岁),94.82%的女性患有ASRM 3-4级子宫内膜异位症。近半数患者行全子宫和双侧输卵管切除术。同期结直肠切除术包括阑尾/盲钉切除术(41.38%)、直肠剃须(36.21%)、直肠楔形切除术(39.66%)、肛管盘状切除术(1.72%)和直肠节段切除术(15.52%)。输尿管狭窄的部分膀胱切除术和广泛输尿管溶解分别占5.17%和11.54%。中位控制时间为148分钟(范围49-480分钟),转换率为0%,估计失血量中位数为100毫升。中位住院时间为3天(范围1-7天)。Clavien-Dindo并发症≥2的发生率为5.17%。30天内无吻合口瘘、其他感染并发症、术后肠梗阻、输血需要、死亡。结论:机器人辅助入路可行且安全,总体手术时间短,出血量可接受,无转换,住院时间相对较短,术后短期并发症最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ANZ Journal of Surgery
ANZ Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
720
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信