Impact of paralytic choice on postintubation sedation and analgesia in the emergency department.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Calvin Hwang, Benjamin Michaels, Kristen Park, Andrew Dang, Christine Vo, Stephen Lee, Zlatan Coralic
{"title":"Impact of paralytic choice on postintubation sedation and analgesia in the emergency department.","authors":"Calvin Hwang, Benjamin Michaels, Kristen Park, Andrew Dang, Christine Vo, Stephen Lee, Zlatan Coralic","doi":"10.1093/ajhp/zxaf037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We describe the timing of first-dose sedation and analgesia after rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in patients induced with etomidate and paralyzed with rocuronium or succinylcholine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of adult patients undergoing RSI in 3 emergency departments (EDs). We evaluated the time to administration of analgesia and sedation using a Cox proportional hazard model controlling for choice of paralytic, post-RSI hypotension (nadir systolic blood pressure of less than 100 mm Hg in the first hour), bedside presence of an ED pharmacist, and practice site. We also describe the first doses of post-RSI analgesia and sedation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,059 adult patients were included in the study, of whom 1,532 received rocuronium and 527 received succinylcholine. The median time to first dose of sedation was 12 minutes (interquartile range [IQR], 7-26 minutes) in patients given rocuronium and 10 minutes (IQR, 6-19 minutes) in those given succinylcholine. The median time to analgesia was 24 minutes (IQR, 10-78 minutes) and 21 minutes (IQR, 10-60 minutes), respectively. Administration of rocuronium was associated with lower rates of sedation (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-0.85) and analgesia (aHR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.62-0.87). Hypotension was also predictive of decreased sedation (aHR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54-0.80), while bedside presence of an ED pharmacist was associated with improvement (aHR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.03-1.27). Overall, the median post-RSI initial propofol infusion rate was low at 20 μg/kg/min (IQR, 10-30 μg/kg/min).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of rocuronium for RSI was associated with reduced likelihood of timely post-RSI sedation and analgesia. Coupled with low initial sedative dosing, our findings suggest that patients intubated with rocuronium are at increased risk of being awake during paralysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7577,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"S2929-S2936"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxaf037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We describe the timing of first-dose sedation and analgesia after rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in patients induced with etomidate and paralyzed with rocuronium or succinylcholine.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of adult patients undergoing RSI in 3 emergency departments (EDs). We evaluated the time to administration of analgesia and sedation using a Cox proportional hazard model controlling for choice of paralytic, post-RSI hypotension (nadir systolic blood pressure of less than 100 mm Hg in the first hour), bedside presence of an ED pharmacist, and practice site. We also describe the first doses of post-RSI analgesia and sedation.

Results: A total of 2,059 adult patients were included in the study, of whom 1,532 received rocuronium and 527 received succinylcholine. The median time to first dose of sedation was 12 minutes (interquartile range [IQR], 7-26 minutes) in patients given rocuronium and 10 minutes (IQR, 6-19 minutes) in those given succinylcholine. The median time to analgesia was 24 minutes (IQR, 10-78 minutes) and 21 minutes (IQR, 10-60 minutes), respectively. Administration of rocuronium was associated with lower rates of sedation (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-0.85) and analgesia (aHR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.62-0.87). Hypotension was also predictive of decreased sedation (aHR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54-0.80), while bedside presence of an ED pharmacist was associated with improvement (aHR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.03-1.27). Overall, the median post-RSI initial propofol infusion rate was low at 20 μg/kg/min (IQR, 10-30 μg/kg/min).

Conclusion: Use of rocuronium for RSI was associated with reduced likelihood of timely post-RSI sedation and analgesia. Coupled with low initial sedative dosing, our findings suggest that patients intubated with rocuronium are at increased risk of being awake during paralysis.

麻痹选择对急诊插管后镇静镇痛的影响。
免责声明:为了加快文章的发表,AJHP在接受稿件后将尽快在网上发布。被接受的稿件已经过同行评审和编辑,但在技术格式化和作者校对之前会在网上发布。这些手稿不是记录的最终版本,稍后将被最终文章(按照AJHP风格格式化并由作者校对)所取代。目的:描述依托咪酯诱导、罗库溴铵或琥珀酰胆碱麻痹患者快速序贯插管(RSI)后第一剂量镇静镇痛的时机。方法:回顾性研究3个急诊科(ed)的成人RSI患者。我们使用Cox比例风险模型评估给药和镇静的时间,控制麻痹、rsi后低血压(第一个小时收缩压低于100 mm Hg)、床边有ED药剂师和实习地点的选择。我们还描述了rsi后镇痛和镇静的第一剂量。结果:共纳入2059例成人患者,其中1532例接受罗库溴铵治疗,527例接受琥珀酰胆碱治疗。罗库溴铵组至首次镇静的中位时间为12分钟(四分位数间距[IQR], 7-26分钟),琥珀酰胆碱组至首次镇静的中位时间为10分钟(IQR, 6-19分钟)。镇痛的中位时间分别为24分钟(IQR, 10-78分钟)和21分钟(IQR, 10-60分钟)。给予罗库溴铵与较低的镇静率相关(校正风险比[aHR], 0.75;95%可信区间[CI], 0.67-0.85)和镇痛(aHR, 0.73;95% ci, 0.62-0.87)。低血压也预示镇静作用降低(aHR, 0.67;95% CI, 0.54-0.80),而床边ED药剂师的存在与改善相关(aHR, 1.14;95% ci, 1.03-1.27)。总体而言,rsi后初始异丙酚输注速率中位数较低,为20µg/kg/min (IQR, 10-30µg/kg/min)。结论:使用罗库溴铵治疗RSI与RSI后及时镇静和镇痛的可能性降低有关。再加上较低的初始镇静剂量,我们的研究结果表明,插管罗库溴铵的患者在瘫痪期间清醒的风险增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
18.50%
发文量
341
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy (AJHP) is the official publication of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP). It publishes peer-reviewed scientific papers on contemporary drug therapy and pharmacy practice innovations in hospitals and health systems. With a circulation of more than 43,000, AJHP is the most widely recognized and respected clinical pharmacy journal in the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信