“I'm tired of seeing my friends die”: Barriers and facilitators to participating in clinical trials among rural people who use drugs in the United States

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kathryn E. Lancaster PhD, Angela T. Estadt PhD, Madison N. Enderle MPH, Todd P. Korthuis MD, April M. Young PhD
{"title":"“I'm tired of seeing my friends die”: Barriers and facilitators to participating in clinical trials among rural people who use drugs in the United States","authors":"Kathryn E. Lancaster PhD,&nbsp;Angela T. Estadt PhD,&nbsp;Madison N. Enderle MPH,&nbsp;Todd P. Korthuis MD,&nbsp;April M. Young PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Participation in clinical trials among people who use drugs (PWUD) in rural areas remains disproportionately low compared to those in urban communities. Our objective was to describe the barriers and facilitators to clinical trial participation among this understudied and underserved population.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews among rural PWUD in Kentucky, Ohio, and Oregon. Using the Ickovics and Meisler framework, we classified factors associated with participation in clinical trials among rural PWUD into five categories: the individual, trial and intervention characteristics, participant-trial staff relationship, clinical trial setting, and features of the disease. We used inductive qualitative analysis methods to identify salient themes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-five rural participants (median age: 39, 51% men) completed in-depth interviews. Facilitators for rural clinical trial participation were mainly situated within the individual, trial and intervention characteristics, and clinical trial setting. Individual characteristics, such as altruistic motivations to help their communities and peers, as well as trial and intervention characteristics like visit reminders and resource assistance, were the most frequently noted facilitators of clinical trial participation. In contrast, participation barriers were mainly related to participant-trial staff relationships and disease features. Judgmental and untrustworthy trial staff, along with involvement in the criminal legal system, were obstacles to clinical trial participation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Individual, intrapersonal, and logistical factors described by rural PWUD must be addressed to enhance the participation and retention of this population in clinical trials. Successful clinical trial participation may contribute to equitable access to essential health services by PWUD in rural communities.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.70009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Participation in clinical trials among people who use drugs (PWUD) in rural areas remains disproportionately low compared to those in urban communities. Our objective was to describe the barriers and facilitators to clinical trial participation among this understudied and underserved population.

Methods

We conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews among rural PWUD in Kentucky, Ohio, and Oregon. Using the Ickovics and Meisler framework, we classified factors associated with participation in clinical trials among rural PWUD into five categories: the individual, trial and intervention characteristics, participant-trial staff relationship, clinical trial setting, and features of the disease. We used inductive qualitative analysis methods to identify salient themes.

Findings

Thirty-five rural participants (median age: 39, 51% men) completed in-depth interviews. Facilitators for rural clinical trial participation were mainly situated within the individual, trial and intervention characteristics, and clinical trial setting. Individual characteristics, such as altruistic motivations to help their communities and peers, as well as trial and intervention characteristics like visit reminders and resource assistance, were the most frequently noted facilitators of clinical trial participation. In contrast, participation barriers were mainly related to participant-trial staff relationships and disease features. Judgmental and untrustworthy trial staff, along with involvement in the criminal legal system, were obstacles to clinical trial participation.

Conclusions

Individual, intrapersonal, and logistical factors described by rural PWUD must be addressed to enhance the participation and retention of this population in clinical trials. Successful clinical trial participation may contribute to equitable access to essential health services by PWUD in rural communities.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信