Comparing the Fate of eDNA by Particle Sizes and Molecule Lengths in Recirculating Streams

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Pedro F. P. Brandão-Dias, Elise Snyder, Jennifer L. Tank, Ursula H. Mahl, Brett Peters, Arial J. Shogren, Diogo Bolster, Gary A. Lamberti, Kyle Bibby, Scott P. Egan
{"title":"Comparing the Fate of eDNA by Particle Sizes and Molecule Lengths in Recirculating Streams","authors":"Pedro F. P. Brandão-Dias,&nbsp;Elise Snyder,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Tank,&nbsp;Ursula H. Mahl,&nbsp;Brett Peters,&nbsp;Arial J. Shogren,&nbsp;Diogo Bolster,&nbsp;Gary A. Lamberti,&nbsp;Kyle Bibby,&nbsp;Scott P. Egan","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The detection of environmental DNA (eDNA) has revolutionized aquatic species monitoring, yet interpreting eDNA data remains challenging due to gaps in our understanding of eDNA ecology (i.e., origin, state, transport, and fate) and variability in how eDNA methods are applied across the literature. A crucial aspect of the complexity of eDNA ecology is that eDNA is a heterogeneous mix of components that vary in size and other properties, thereby influencing interactions with the environment in diverse ways. In this study, we explore the interplay between three eDNA particle sizes (the physical dimension of eDNA-containing particles) and two molecule lengths (DNA size in base pairs) in flowing water systems. Specifically, we elucidated the mechanisms governing the removal of different eDNA components using a set of 24 recirculating mesocosms where we varied light and substrate conditions. Consistent with previous observations, our findings revealed substantial differences in the mechanisms of eDNA removal between small and large eDNA particles. In mesocosms with biofilm-colonized substrate, we found higher removal rates for smaller particles, but larger eDNA particles were removed more quickly in presence of any substrate. Importantly, we also found that biofilm removes longer eDNA molecules faster, shedding light on a probable mechanism underlying the longstanding association between eDNA removal and the presence of biofilm. Despite the association between biofilm colonization and faster removal of longer molecules, the two eDNA molecule sizes we analyzed (86 and 387 base pairs) exhibited somewhat consistent behavior. In combination, our observations highlight that particle size is an important predictor of eDNA fate, and that eDNA fate shows few differences across varying molecule lengths. Furthermore, our work suggests that conclusions regarding eDNA ecology from studies utilizing short DNA markers are applicable to metabarcoding applications, which typically use longer marker lengths.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70066","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The detection of environmental DNA (eDNA) has revolutionized aquatic species monitoring, yet interpreting eDNA data remains challenging due to gaps in our understanding of eDNA ecology (i.e., origin, state, transport, and fate) and variability in how eDNA methods are applied across the literature. A crucial aspect of the complexity of eDNA ecology is that eDNA is a heterogeneous mix of components that vary in size and other properties, thereby influencing interactions with the environment in diverse ways. In this study, we explore the interplay between three eDNA particle sizes (the physical dimension of eDNA-containing particles) and two molecule lengths (DNA size in base pairs) in flowing water systems. Specifically, we elucidated the mechanisms governing the removal of different eDNA components using a set of 24 recirculating mesocosms where we varied light and substrate conditions. Consistent with previous observations, our findings revealed substantial differences in the mechanisms of eDNA removal between small and large eDNA particles. In mesocosms with biofilm-colonized substrate, we found higher removal rates for smaller particles, but larger eDNA particles were removed more quickly in presence of any substrate. Importantly, we also found that biofilm removes longer eDNA molecules faster, shedding light on a probable mechanism underlying the longstanding association between eDNA removal and the presence of biofilm. Despite the association between biofilm colonization and faster removal of longer molecules, the two eDNA molecule sizes we analyzed (86 and 387 base pairs) exhibited somewhat consistent behavior. In combination, our observations highlight that particle size is an important predictor of eDNA fate, and that eDNA fate shows few differences across varying molecule lengths. Furthermore, our work suggests that conclusions regarding eDNA ecology from studies utilizing short DNA markers are applicable to metabarcoding applications, which typically use longer marker lengths.

Abstract Image

通过颗粒大小和分子长度比较eDNA在循环水中的命运
环境DNA (eDNA)的检测已经彻底改变了水生物种的监测,但由于我们对eDNA生态学(即起源、状态、运输和命运)的理解存在差距,以及eDNA方法在整个文献中应用的可变性,解释eDNA数据仍然具有挑战性。eDNA生态复杂性的一个关键方面是,eDNA是由不同大小和其他性质的成分组成的异质混合物,从而以不同的方式影响与环境的相互作用。在这项研究中,我们探索了三种eDNA粒径(含eDNA颗粒的物理尺寸)和两种分子长度(DNA碱基对大小)在流水系统中的相互作用。具体来说,我们阐明了控制去除不同eDNA成分的机制,使用了一组24个循环的中生态系统,其中我们改变了光和底物条件。与之前的观察结果一致,我们的发现揭示了小eDNA颗粒和大eDNA颗粒去除eDNA的机制存在实质性差异。在生物膜定植底物的中生态系统中,我们发现较小颗粒的去除率更高,但较大的eDNA颗粒在任何底物存在下都被更快地去除。重要的是,我们还发现生物膜更快地去除更长的eDNA分子,揭示了eDNA去除与生物膜存在之间长期存在关联的可能机制。尽管生物膜定植与较长分子的快速去除之间存在关联,但我们分析的两种eDNA分子大小(86和387碱基对)表现出某种一致的行为。综上所述,我们的观察结果强调了颗粒大小是eDNA命运的重要预测因子,并且eDNA命运在不同分子长度之间几乎没有差异。此外,我们的工作表明,利用短DNA标记的研究得出的关于eDNA生态学的结论适用于通常使用较长标记长度的元条形码应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信