Improving the tensile strength of reinforced concrete: evaluating the impact of different fiber additives through numerical and experimental analysis

IF 2.8 3区 工程技术 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Jinwei Fu, Vahab Sarfarazi, Hadi Haeri, Zhihao Wang, Mohammad Fatehi Marji
{"title":"Improving the tensile strength of reinforced concrete: evaluating the impact of different fiber additives through numerical and experimental analysis","authors":"Jinwei Fu,&nbsp;Vahab Sarfarazi,&nbsp;Hadi Haeri,&nbsp;Zhihao Wang,&nbsp;Mohammad Fatehi Marji","doi":"10.1007/s40571-024-00839-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research investigates the effect of various fibers on the strength and flexibility of concrete from an educational perspective. In this research, the use of additives including types of fibers (macrosynthetic fibers, polypropylene, and glass fibers) which make up 1% of the volume of hybrid concrete is taught. The combined addition of these fibers to create the hybrid reinforced concrete with high tensile strength and plasticity is discussed in this education. The tensile strength results obtained from direct and indirect methods have significant differences. In the concrete laboratory, multiple experiments were carried out to determine the best fiber composition using two different types of fibers. The experiments included direct tensile testing using the compressive-to-tensile force conversion (CTFC) method, which is a new approach, and indirect tensile testing using the Brazilian disk method. The loading rate for the tests was 1 kg/sec. The average tensile strength was 3.3 MPa, and the average compressive strength was 35 MPa. The Young’s modulus was measured to be 20 GPa. The results showed that macrosynthetic fibers were more effective in increasing the concrete’s tensile strength compared to other combinations. The tests performed on the effects of combining glass fibers with macrosynthetic fibers compared to combining macrosynthetic fibers with polypropylene show a more effective tensile strength. In this article, the direct tensile strength of concrete samples is evaluated by introducing an innovative tensile test device with a ring-shaped sample. The results obtained from this new device have been numerically compared with the uniaxial direct tension method proposed by ISRM. The educational measures of this new knowledge regarding concrete additives and performing innovative tensile strength tests and comparing them with each other provide a detailed understanding of concrete strength evaluation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":524,"journal":{"name":"Computational Particle Mechanics","volume":"12 1","pages":"775 - 792"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Particle Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40571-024-00839-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research investigates the effect of various fibers on the strength and flexibility of concrete from an educational perspective. In this research, the use of additives including types of fibers (macrosynthetic fibers, polypropylene, and glass fibers) which make up 1% of the volume of hybrid concrete is taught. The combined addition of these fibers to create the hybrid reinforced concrete with high tensile strength and plasticity is discussed in this education. The tensile strength results obtained from direct and indirect methods have significant differences. In the concrete laboratory, multiple experiments were carried out to determine the best fiber composition using two different types of fibers. The experiments included direct tensile testing using the compressive-to-tensile force conversion (CTFC) method, which is a new approach, and indirect tensile testing using the Brazilian disk method. The loading rate for the tests was 1 kg/sec. The average tensile strength was 3.3 MPa, and the average compressive strength was 35 MPa. The Young’s modulus was measured to be 20 GPa. The results showed that macrosynthetic fibers were more effective in increasing the concrete’s tensile strength compared to other combinations. The tests performed on the effects of combining glass fibers with macrosynthetic fibers compared to combining macrosynthetic fibers with polypropylene show a more effective tensile strength. In this article, the direct tensile strength of concrete samples is evaluated by introducing an innovative tensile test device with a ring-shaped sample. The results obtained from this new device have been numerically compared with the uniaxial direct tension method proposed by ISRM. The educational measures of this new knowledge regarding concrete additives and performing innovative tensile strength tests and comparing them with each other provide a detailed understanding of concrete strength evaluation.

提高钢筋混凝土抗拉强度:通过数值和实验分析评价不同纤维添加剂对混凝土抗拉强度的影响
本研究从教育的角度探讨了各种纤维对混凝土强度和柔韧性的影响。在这项研究中,添加剂的使用包括纤维类型(大合成纤维、聚丙烯和玻璃纤维),它们占混合混凝土体积的1%。这些纤维的组合添加,以创造混合钢筋混凝土具有高抗拉强度和可塑性的讨论在这个教育。直接法和间接法得到的抗拉强度结果有显著差异。在混凝土实验室中,采用两种不同类型的纤维进行了多次试验,以确定最佳纤维组成。实验包括采用新方法压缩-拉伸力转换(CTFC)法进行直接拉伸测试,以及采用巴西圆盘法进行间接拉伸测试。试验的加载速率为1千克/秒。平均抗拉强度为3.3 MPa,平均抗压强度为35 MPa。杨氏模量测量为20gpa。结果表明,与其他组合相比,大合成纤维对混凝土抗拉强度的提高更为有效。对玻璃纤维与大合成纤维的复合效果进行了试验,与大合成纤维与聚丙烯的复合效果相比,显示出更有效的抗拉强度。本文介绍了一种新型的环形试样抗拉试验装置,对混凝土试样的直接抗拉强度进行了评价。并与ISRM提出的单轴直接拉伸法进行了数值比较。这种关于混凝土添加剂的新知识的教育措施和执行创新的抗拉强度测试,并相互比较,提供了对混凝土强度评估的详细了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computational Particle Mechanics
Computational Particle Mechanics Mathematics-Computational Mathematics
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: GENERAL OBJECTIVES: Computational Particle Mechanics (CPM) is a quarterly journal with the goal of publishing full-length original articles addressing the modeling and simulation of systems involving particles and particle methods. The goal is to enhance communication among researchers in the applied sciences who use "particles'''' in one form or another in their research. SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES: Particle-based materials and numerical methods have become wide-spread in the natural and applied sciences, engineering, biology. The term "particle methods/mechanics'''' has now come to imply several different things to researchers in the 21st century, including: (a) Particles as a physical unit in granular media, particulate flows, plasmas, swarms, etc., (b) Particles representing material phases in continua at the meso-, micro-and nano-scale and (c) Particles as a discretization unit in continua and discontinua in numerical methods such as Discrete Element Methods (DEM), Particle Finite Element Methods (PFEM), Molecular Dynamics (MD), and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH), to name a few.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信