{"title":"Into the Multiverse: Strategies for Teaching Social Studies of Energy at a Technical University","authors":"Mallory James","doi":"10.1109/MTS.2025.3539203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay, I present the learning goals and teaching strategies for “Social Studies of Energy,” a class I developed and implemented during a phase of personal transition between different educational contexts. By “multiverse,” I refer to my perception of multiple universes of expert knowledge, terminology, interests, and priorities, all coexisting but not necessarily interacting or exchanging with each other in relation to the ambiguous signifier “energy.” These universes of expertise have their own scholarly journals, key definitions, and central intellectual heroes; some include forms of activism in which personal experience, knowledge, and commitment are at least as central as insights gained through formal education. The coexistence of mutually incompatible forms of energy expertise presents teaching challenges. I describe how I decided my scope of inclusivity while designing “Social Studies of Energy” and how I managed associated risks of conceptual, political, and ontological incoherence. Results are relevant for teachers aiming to maintain and expand academic habitats for advanced qualitative reasoning pertaining to engineering and energy studies.","PeriodicalId":55016,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Technology and Society Magazine","volume":"44 1","pages":"101-108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Technology and Society Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10907924/","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this essay, I present the learning goals and teaching strategies for “Social Studies of Energy,” a class I developed and implemented during a phase of personal transition between different educational contexts. By “multiverse,” I refer to my perception of multiple universes of expert knowledge, terminology, interests, and priorities, all coexisting but not necessarily interacting or exchanging with each other in relation to the ambiguous signifier “energy.” These universes of expertise have their own scholarly journals, key definitions, and central intellectual heroes; some include forms of activism in which personal experience, knowledge, and commitment are at least as central as insights gained through formal education. The coexistence of mutually incompatible forms of energy expertise presents teaching challenges. I describe how I decided my scope of inclusivity while designing “Social Studies of Energy” and how I managed associated risks of conceptual, political, and ontological incoherence. Results are relevant for teachers aiming to maintain and expand academic habitats for advanced qualitative reasoning pertaining to engineering and energy studies.
期刊介绍:
IEEE Technology and Society Magazine invites feature articles (refereed), special articles, and commentaries on topics within the scope of the IEEE Society on Social Implications of Technology, in the broad areas of social implications of electrotechnology, history of electrotechnology, and engineering ethics.