Enhancing energy resilience in manufacturing enterprises: A systematic mapping of challenges to strategies

P. Lebepe, T.N.D. Mathaba
{"title":"Enhancing energy resilience in manufacturing enterprises: A systematic mapping of challenges to strategies","authors":"P. Lebepe,&nbsp;T.N.D. Mathaba","doi":"10.1016/j.ject.2025.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>An unreliable energy supply disrupts productivity and operational stability in manufacturing enterprises worldwide. Addressing these challenges requires achieving consensus among experts from diverse backgrounds. This study provides a preliminary understanding of mapping challenges to strategies, ensuring each challenge is paired with the most effective solution. By employing a structured and methodological approach, it ensures actionable insights, advancing academic discourse on energy resilience frameworks and their practical application in manufacturing enterprises. The study integrates Fleiss’ Kappa for expert agreement with the CRITIC (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) method for objective strategy weighting, ensuring rigorous evaluation of relevance and importance. Grounded in the 4As energy resilience framework; Availability, Accessibility, Affordability, and Acceptability, the approach ensures adaptability and a balanced alignment of challenges with actionable strategies. Fourteen industry experts validated the framework, prioritizing strategies such as flexible scheduling and renewable energy integration. This study addresses the limitations of traditional methods like Delphi, which require multiple rounds and delay outcomes, by achieving rapid consensus in a single round. Combining Fleiss’ Kappa and CRITIC balances qualitative insights with objective analysis, reducing biases and enhancing reliability. These contributions establish the framework as a novel, scalable, and practical tool for improving energy resilience in diverse manufacturing contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100776,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economy and Technology","volume":"3 ","pages":"Pages 82-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949948825000022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An unreliable energy supply disrupts productivity and operational stability in manufacturing enterprises worldwide. Addressing these challenges requires achieving consensus among experts from diverse backgrounds. This study provides a preliminary understanding of mapping challenges to strategies, ensuring each challenge is paired with the most effective solution. By employing a structured and methodological approach, it ensures actionable insights, advancing academic discourse on energy resilience frameworks and their practical application in manufacturing enterprises. The study integrates Fleiss’ Kappa for expert agreement with the CRITIC (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) method for objective strategy weighting, ensuring rigorous evaluation of relevance and importance. Grounded in the 4As energy resilience framework; Availability, Accessibility, Affordability, and Acceptability, the approach ensures adaptability and a balanced alignment of challenges with actionable strategies. Fourteen industry experts validated the framework, prioritizing strategies such as flexible scheduling and renewable energy integration. This study addresses the limitations of traditional methods like Delphi, which require multiple rounds and delay outcomes, by achieving rapid consensus in a single round. Combining Fleiss’ Kappa and CRITIC balances qualitative insights with objective analysis, reducing biases and enhancing reliability. These contributions establish the framework as a novel, scalable, and practical tool for improving energy resilience in diverse manufacturing contexts.
增强制造企业的能源弹性:战略挑战的系统映射
不可靠的能源供应会破坏全球制造企业的生产力和运营稳定性。应对这些挑战需要不同背景的专家达成共识。本研究提供了将挑战映射到策略的初步理解,确保每个挑战都与最有效的解决方案相匹配。通过采用结构化和方法论的方法,它确保了可操作的见解,推进了能源弹性框架的学术论述及其在制造企业中的实际应用。该研究将Fleiss的Kappa专家协议与批评家(通过标准间相关性的标准重要性)方法相结合,用于客观策略加权,确保对相关性和重要性进行严格评估。基于4a能源弹性框架;可用性、可访问性、可负担性和可接受性,该方法确保了可适应性和挑战与可操作策略的平衡对齐。14位行业专家验证了该框架,优先考虑了灵活调度和可再生能源整合等策略。该研究解决了传统方法(如Delphi)需要多轮和延迟结果的局限性,通过在单轮中实现快速共识。结合Fleiss的Kappa和CRITIC平衡定性见解与客观分析,减少偏见和提高可靠性。这些贡献使该框架成为一种新颖的、可扩展的、实用的工具,用于提高不同制造环境下的能源弹性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信