Development of an innovative approach to the assessment of eye–hand coordination in a dual-task context in prepubertal children

IF 1.8 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Pedro Ángel Latorre Román , Victor Serrano Huete , Eva María Atero Mata , Karina Elizabeth Andrade-Lara , Juan Antonio Párraga Montilla , Julio Herrador Sánchez , Asensio Moreno Marín , Melchor Martínez Redondo , Daniel Manjón Pozas , Jesús Salas Sánchez , José Carlos Cabrera Linares , Manolo Lucena Zurita
{"title":"Development of an innovative approach to the assessment of eye–hand coordination in a dual-task context in prepubertal children","authors":"Pedro Ángel Latorre Román ,&nbsp;Victor Serrano Huete ,&nbsp;Eva María Atero Mata ,&nbsp;Karina Elizabeth Andrade-Lara ,&nbsp;Juan Antonio Párraga Montilla ,&nbsp;Julio Herrador Sánchez ,&nbsp;Asensio Moreno Marín ,&nbsp;Melchor Martínez Redondo ,&nbsp;Daniel Manjón Pozas ,&nbsp;Jesús Salas Sánchez ,&nbsp;José Carlos Cabrera Linares ,&nbsp;Manolo Lucena Zurita","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2025.106217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The purposes of this study were to examine both the validity and reliability of an eye–hand coordination (EHC) test in a dual-task paradigm in prepubertal children and the capacity of this test to discriminate between sex and age. A total of 440 children aged 6 and 11 years participated in this study. To assess EHC, a ball throwing and wall catching test was used in three different conditions (non-interference, auditory, and visual). In each condition, the duration of the test was 90 s. The numbers of successful throws and mistakes in each condition were recorded. The study demonstrated robust validation, with high interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) indicating excellent reliability. The ICC for the number of EHC successes was.980 (95% confidence interval (CI) = [.969,.987], <em>p</em> &lt; .001), whereas the ICC for EHC mistakes was.856 (95% CI = [.782,.905], <em>p</em> &lt; .001). The standard error of measurement (SEM) was 3.17 (5.36%) for EHC successes and 1.396 (19.86%) for EHC mistakes. In addition, significant differences were observed between boys and girls (<em>p</em> &lt; .05). In conclusion, the EHC test demonstrated good reliability and validity among prepubertal children. These findings validate the tool’s robustness for use in research and practice. Moreover, boys showed superior performance, which decreased in the dual-task condition regardless of age, sex, or type of interference.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 106217"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096525000232","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to examine both the validity and reliability of an eye–hand coordination (EHC) test in a dual-task paradigm in prepubertal children and the capacity of this test to discriminate between sex and age. A total of 440 children aged 6 and 11 years participated in this study. To assess EHC, a ball throwing and wall catching test was used in three different conditions (non-interference, auditory, and visual). In each condition, the duration of the test was 90 s. The numbers of successful throws and mistakes in each condition were recorded. The study demonstrated robust validation, with high interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) indicating excellent reliability. The ICC for the number of EHC successes was.980 (95% confidence interval (CI) = [.969,.987], p < .001), whereas the ICC for EHC mistakes was.856 (95% CI = [.782,.905], p < .001). The standard error of measurement (SEM) was 3.17 (5.36%) for EHC successes and 1.396 (19.86%) for EHC mistakes. In addition, significant differences were observed between boys and girls (p < .05). In conclusion, the EHC test demonstrated good reliability and validity among prepubertal children. These findings validate the tool’s robustness for use in research and practice. Moreover, boys showed superior performance, which decreased in the dual-task condition regardless of age, sex, or type of interference.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology is an excellent source of information concerning all aspects of the development of children. It includes empirical psychological research on cognitive, social/emotional, and physical development. In addition, the journal periodically publishes Special Topic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信