Influencia de las redes sociales en la descarga de artículos de Radiología

IF 1.1 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING

RADIOLOGIA Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rx.2024.08.002

D. Herrán de la Gala , E. Serrano Alcalá , B. Domenech-Ximenos , C. García Villar

{"title":"Influencia de las redes sociales en la descarga de artículos de Radiología","authors":"D. Herrán de la Gala , E. Serrano Alcalá , B. Domenech-Ximenos , C. García Villar","doi":"10.1016/j.rx.2024.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Social Media (SM) has transformed how content is shared, especially in the case of medicine. These platforms allow scientific literature to be shared and discussed. SM extends the reach of these scientific articles independent of their quality. The aim of this study was to discover whether sharing an article from <em>Radiología</em> on X (formerly known as Twitter) impacted its reach by analysing the number of downloads, taking into account the different article sections and types.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>We selected articles published in <em>Radiología</em> between 2020 and 2022. The articles were promoted by two X accounts: @SERAM_RX and @RevistaRADIOLO2, and downloads were analysed prior to and following dissemination on X.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 100 articles were examined. There was a significant increase in downloads after dissemination on both X accounts (@SERAM_RX: median 49.50, IQR 18.50–73.50 vs median 76.50, IQR 23.75–19; p<0,001 and @RevistaRADIOLO2: median 43, IQR 13.75–133 vs median 65,50, IQR 20,50–277,50; p <0,001), with no significant differences between the two accounts. Posts from @RevistaRADIOLO2 generated more interactions (views, ‘likes’, reposts; p<0,05). Clinical care articles were downloaded more from @SERAM_RX (@SERAM_RX: median 83, IQR 24–198 vs @RevistaRADIOLO2: median 38, IQR 16–79; p<0.045).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Sharing articles on SM increases downloads. SM significantly increases the reach of scientific articles and the number of downloads, highlighting the importance of a solid editorial strategy for these platforms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":31509,"journal":{"name":"RADIOLOGIA","volume":"67 2","pages":"Pages 155-161"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RADIOLOGIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033833824001279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Social Media (SM) has transformed how content is shared, especially in the case of medicine. These platforms allow scientific literature to be shared and discussed. SM extends the reach of these scientific articles independent of their quality. The aim of this study was to discover whether sharing an article from Radiología on X (formerly known as Twitter) impacted its reach by analysing the number of downloads, taking into account the different article sections and types.

Material and methods

We selected articles published in Radiología between 2020 and 2022. The articles were promoted by two X accounts: @SERAM_RX and @RevistaRADIOLO2, and downloads were analysed prior to and following dissemination on X.

Results

A total of 100 articles were examined. There was a significant increase in downloads after dissemination on both X accounts (@SERAM_RX: median 49.50, IQR 18.50–73.50 vs median 76.50, IQR 23.75–19; p< 0,001 and @RevistaRADIOLO2: median 43, IQR 13.75–133 vs median 65,50, IQR 20,50–277,50; p < 0,001), with no significant differences between the two accounts. Posts from @RevistaRADIOLO2 generated more interactions (views, ‘likes’, reposts; p< 0,05). Clinical care articles were downloaded more from @SERAM_RX (@SERAM_RX: median 83, IQR 24–198 vs @RevistaRADIOLO2: median 38, IQR 16–79; p< 0.045).

Conclusion

Sharing articles on SM increases downloads. SM significantly increases the reach of scientific articles and the number of downloads, highlighting the importance of a solid editorial strategy for these platforms.

查看原文本刊更多论文

社交网络对放射学文章下载的影响

社交媒体（SM）已经改变了内容的共享方式，尤其是在医学领域。这些平台允许科学文献被共享和讨论。SM扩展了这些科学文章的影响范围，而不依赖于它们的质量。本研究的目的是通过分析下载数量，考虑到不同的文章部分和类型，发现在X（以前称为Twitter）上分享Radiología的文章是否会影响其影响力。材料和方法我们选择了2020年至2022年期间在Radiología上发表的文章。文章由两个X账号：@SERAM_RX和@RevistaRADIOLO2进行推广，并在X上传播之前和之后分析下载情况。在这两个X账户(@SERAM_RX：中位数49.50,IQR 18.50-73.50 vs中位数76.50,IQR 23.75-19；术中;0,001和@RevistaRADIOLO2：中位数43，IQR 13.75-133 vs中位数65,50,IQR 20,50 - 277,50；p & lt;0,001)，两个账户之间没有显著差异。@RevistaRADIOLO2的帖子产生了更多的互动(浏览量、“赞”、转发；术中;0 05)。临床护理文章从@SERAM_RX下载更多(@SERAM_RX：中位数83，IQR 24-198 vs @RevistaRADIOLO2：中位数38，IQR 16-79；术中;0.045)。在SM上分享文章可以增加下载量。SM显著地增加了科学文章的传播范围和下载量，突出了这些平台可靠的编辑策略的重要性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

RADIOLOGIA RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

7.70%

发文量

105

审稿时长

52 days

期刊介绍： La mejor revista para conocer de primera mano los originales más relevantes en la especialidad y las revisiones, casos y notas clínicas de mayor interés profesional. Además es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Radiología Médica.