Influencia de las redes sociales en la descarga de artículos de Radiología

IF 1.1 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
D. Herrán de la Gala , E. Serrano Alcalá , B. Domenech-Ximenos , C. García Villar
{"title":"Influencia de las redes sociales en la descarga de artículos de Radiología","authors":"D. Herrán de la Gala ,&nbsp;E. Serrano Alcalá ,&nbsp;B. Domenech-Ximenos ,&nbsp;C. García Villar","doi":"10.1016/j.rx.2024.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Social Media (SM) has transformed how content is shared, especially in the case of medicine. These platforms allow scientific literature to be shared and discussed. SM extends the reach of these scientific articles independent of their quality. The aim of this study was to discover whether sharing an article from <em>Radiología</em> on X (formerly known as Twitter) impacted its reach by analysing the number of downloads, taking into account the different article sections and types.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>We selected articles published in <em>Radiología</em> between 2020 and 2022. The articles were promoted by two X accounts: @SERAM_RX and @RevistaRADIOLO2, and downloads were analysed prior to and following dissemination on X.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 100 articles were examined. There was a significant increase in downloads after dissemination on both X accounts (@SERAM_RX: median 49.50, IQR 18.50–73.50 vs median 76.50, IQR 23.75–19; p&lt;<!--> <!-->0,001 and @RevistaRADIOLO2: median 43, IQR 13.75–133 vs median 65,50, IQR 20,50–277,50; p &lt;<!--> <!-->0,001), with no significant differences between the two accounts. Posts from @RevistaRADIOLO2 generated more interactions (views, ‘likes’, reposts; p&lt;<!--> <!-->0,05). Clinical care articles were downloaded more from @SERAM_RX (@SERAM_RX: median 83, IQR 24–198 vs @RevistaRADIOLO2: median 38, IQR 16–79; p&lt;<!--> <!-->0.045).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Sharing articles on SM increases downloads. SM significantly increases the reach of scientific articles and the number of downloads, highlighting the importance of a solid editorial strategy for these platforms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":31509,"journal":{"name":"RADIOLOGIA","volume":"67 2","pages":"Pages 155-161"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RADIOLOGIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033833824001279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Social Media (SM) has transformed how content is shared, especially in the case of medicine. These platforms allow scientific literature to be shared and discussed. SM extends the reach of these scientific articles independent of their quality. The aim of this study was to discover whether sharing an article from Radiología on X (formerly known as Twitter) impacted its reach by analysing the number of downloads, taking into account the different article sections and types.

Material and methods

We selected articles published in Radiología between 2020 and 2022. The articles were promoted by two X accounts: @SERAM_RX and @RevistaRADIOLO2, and downloads were analysed prior to and following dissemination on X.

Results

A total of 100 articles were examined. There was a significant increase in downloads after dissemination on both X accounts (@SERAM_RX: median 49.50, IQR 18.50–73.50 vs median 76.50, IQR 23.75–19; p< 0,001 and @RevistaRADIOLO2: median 43, IQR 13.75–133 vs median 65,50, IQR 20,50–277,50; p < 0,001), with no significant differences between the two accounts. Posts from @RevistaRADIOLO2 generated more interactions (views, ‘likes’, reposts; p< 0,05). Clinical care articles were downloaded more from @SERAM_RX (@SERAM_RX: median 83, IQR 24–198 vs @RevistaRADIOLO2: median 38, IQR 16–79; p< 0.045).

Conclusion

Sharing articles on SM increases downloads. SM significantly increases the reach of scientific articles and the number of downloads, highlighting the importance of a solid editorial strategy for these platforms.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
RADIOLOGIA
RADIOLOGIA RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: La mejor revista para conocer de primera mano los originales más relevantes en la especialidad y las revisiones, casos y notas clínicas de mayor interés profesional. Además es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Radiología Médica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信