Contrast-enhanced US and contrast-enhanced CT for diagnosis of focal liver lesions in liver transplant recipients: A comparative study

Nong Gao , Dongli Wang , Xiuzhu Ma , Faqin Lv , Xiuyun Ren
{"title":"Contrast-enhanced US and contrast-enhanced CT for diagnosis of focal liver lesions in liver transplant recipients: A comparative study","authors":"Nong Gao ,&nbsp;Dongli Wang ,&nbsp;Xiuzhu Ma ,&nbsp;Faqin Lv ,&nbsp;Xiuyun Ren","doi":"10.1016/j.iliver.2025.100147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is widely used in the diagnosis of complications after liver transplantation. This study compared the diagnostic efficacy of CEUS with that of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for focal liver lesions in liver transplant recipients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed 115 liver transplant recipients who were diagnosed to have focal liver lesions at our hospital between June 2015 and June 2023. All patients were examined by CEUS and CECT and had a definitive pathological diagnosis. Based on the diagnostic outcomes, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of these imaging modalities in differentiating between benign and malignant lesions were calculated using a four-table method. Differences in diagnostic efficacy between CEUS and CECT with respect to pathological findings were compared using the chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test. The consistency of diagnosis between these modalities was assessed using the linear weighted kappa test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CEUS identified 79 malignant and 36 benign lesions, while CECT detected 81 malignant and 34 benign lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy of CEUS and CECT in diagnosis of focal lesions in transplanted livers were 95.7% vs 97.2%, 97.2% vs 96.1%, 97.9% vs 97.5%, 97.2% vs 98.6%, and 96.4% vs 97.1%, respectively. Both CEUS and CECT demonstrated comparable diagnostic efficacy (κ = 0.899). CEUS showed strong diagnostic consistency with pathological results (κ = 0.912) and was more effective than CECT in diagnosing focal normal liver tissue and fat infiltration (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Both methods were equally effective for diagnosis of focal inflammatory lesions, infarction, and hemangioma.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CEUS is as effective as CECT for diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions in transplanted livers but surpasses CECT in differentiating benign lesions, particularly focal normal liver tissue and fat infiltration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100657,"journal":{"name":"iLIVER","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iLIVER","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772947825000052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is widely used in the diagnosis of complications after liver transplantation. This study compared the diagnostic efficacy of CEUS with that of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for focal liver lesions in liver transplant recipients.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 115 liver transplant recipients who were diagnosed to have focal liver lesions at our hospital between June 2015 and June 2023. All patients were examined by CEUS and CECT and had a definitive pathological diagnosis. Based on the diagnostic outcomes, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of these imaging modalities in differentiating between benign and malignant lesions were calculated using a four-table method. Differences in diagnostic efficacy between CEUS and CECT with respect to pathological findings were compared using the chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test. The consistency of diagnosis between these modalities was assessed using the linear weighted kappa test.

Results

CEUS identified 79 malignant and 36 benign lesions, while CECT detected 81 malignant and 34 benign lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy of CEUS and CECT in diagnosis of focal lesions in transplanted livers were 95.7% vs 97.2%, 97.2% vs 96.1%, 97.9% vs 97.5%, 97.2% vs 98.6%, and 96.4% vs 97.1%, respectively. Both CEUS and CECT demonstrated comparable diagnostic efficacy (κ = 0.899). CEUS showed strong diagnostic consistency with pathological results (κ = 0.912) and was more effective than CECT in diagnosing focal normal liver tissue and fat infiltration (p < 0.05). Both methods were equally effective for diagnosis of focal inflammatory lesions, infarction, and hemangioma.

Conclusion

CEUS is as effective as CECT for diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions in transplanted livers but surpasses CECT in differentiating benign lesions, particularly focal normal liver tissue and fat infiltration.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信