Delirium prevalence and management in general wards, emergency departments, rehabilitation centres and nursing homes in Germany, Austria and Switzerland (DACH countries): A secondary analysis of a worldwide point prevalence study

IF 3.1 Q1 NURSING
Florian Schimböck , Lars Krüger , Magdalena Hoffmann , Marie-Madlen Jeitziner , Heidi Lindroth , Keibun Liu , Peter Nydahl , Rebecca Von Haken , Matthias Thomas Exl , Sibylle Fischbacher , WDAD-DACH study group
{"title":"Delirium prevalence and management in general wards, emergency departments, rehabilitation centres and nursing homes in Germany, Austria and Switzerland (DACH countries): A secondary analysis of a worldwide point prevalence study","authors":"Florian Schimböck ,&nbsp;Lars Krüger ,&nbsp;Magdalena Hoffmann ,&nbsp;Marie-Madlen Jeitziner ,&nbsp;Heidi Lindroth ,&nbsp;Keibun Liu ,&nbsp;Peter Nydahl ,&nbsp;Rebecca Von Haken ,&nbsp;Matthias Thomas Exl ,&nbsp;Sibylle Fischbacher ,&nbsp;WDAD-DACH study group","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Delirium is a common neuropsychiatric syndrome associated with an increased risk of mortality and length of stay. Current delirium prevalence, assessments and management practices of delirium in DACH countries are unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To examine the delirium point prevalence, assessment, management practices in general wards, emergency departments, rehabilitation centres and nursing homes in DACH countries.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Secondary data analysis from a prospective, cross-sectional, worldwide one-day point delirium prevalence study (registered in the German Registry for Clinical Trials, DRKS00030002)</div></div><div><h3>Setting(s)</h3><div>General hospital wards, emergency departments, rehabilitation centres and nursing homes excluding operating rooms, ambulatory, high acuity, intermediate care and intensive care units.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>In total, 172 wards (majority were general wards; 91.3 %, <em>n</em> = 157) from Germany, Austria and Switzerland participated.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Descriptive analysis of a 39-questions online survey with aggregated routine patient and facility data completed by healthcare professionals, administrators, and researchers on World Delirium Awareness Day, March 15th, 2023. Data on delirium prevalence were collected at 8:00 A.M. and P.M. (± 4 h). Use of delirium assessments, delirium awareness structures, presence of care protocols, and barriers to delirium management structures were reported.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall delirium prevalence was 7.1 % (<em>n</em> = 143/2,028) at 8:00 A.M. and 7.2 % (<em>n</em> = 133/1,842) at 8:00 P.M. There was no statistically significant difference between the delirium prevalence assessed with valid (<em>p</em> = .770) or non-valid assessment (<em>p</em> = .643). The most frequent delirium assessments were the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (16.3 %, <em>n</em> = 28/172), the Confusion Assessment Method (15.7 %, <em>n</em> = 27/172) and the Delirium Observation Screening Scale (9.3 %, <em>n</em> = 16/172). The most reported interventions to provide delirium awareness and education were “delirium is mentioned in handovers” (53.5 %, <em>n</em> = 92/172), “availability of delirium experts” (51.2 %, <em>n</em> = 88/172) and “delirium education during the last year” (48.3 %, <em>n</em> = 83/172). An existing delirium management protocol was present in 76.7 % (<em>n</em> = 132/172) of participating wards. The most frequently reported barriers to delirium care were “shortage of staff” (45.3 %, <em>n</em> = 78/172), “patients who are difficult to assess” (32.6 %, <em>n</em> = 56/172), and “communication gaps between professions” (29.1 %, <em>n</em> = 50/172). As non-pharmacological interventions, “mobilization” (92.4 %, <em>n</em> = 159/172), “pain management” (87.8 %, <em>n</em> = 151/172), and “adequate fluids” (83.7 %, <em>n</em> = 144/172) were mostly reported.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Delirium is a frequent complication in patients in DACH countries. More than three quarter of participating wards reported a delirium management protocol suggesting awareness of published guidelines and best practice recommendations. Improved staffing, education on delirium assessment, and interprofessional communication could be helpful to improve the usage of valid delirium assessments and addressing barriers to delirium management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100309"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X25000190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Delirium is a common neuropsychiatric syndrome associated with an increased risk of mortality and length of stay. Current delirium prevalence, assessments and management practices of delirium in DACH countries are unknown.

Objective

To examine the delirium point prevalence, assessment, management practices in general wards, emergency departments, rehabilitation centres and nursing homes in DACH countries.

Design

Secondary data analysis from a prospective, cross-sectional, worldwide one-day point delirium prevalence study (registered in the German Registry for Clinical Trials, DRKS00030002)

Setting(s)

General hospital wards, emergency departments, rehabilitation centres and nursing homes excluding operating rooms, ambulatory, high acuity, intermediate care and intensive care units.

Participants

In total, 172 wards (majority were general wards; 91.3 %, n = 157) from Germany, Austria and Switzerland participated.

Methods

Descriptive analysis of a 39-questions online survey with aggregated routine patient and facility data completed by healthcare professionals, administrators, and researchers on World Delirium Awareness Day, March 15th, 2023. Data on delirium prevalence were collected at 8:00 A.M. and P.M. (± 4 h). Use of delirium assessments, delirium awareness structures, presence of care protocols, and barriers to delirium management structures were reported.

Results

Overall delirium prevalence was 7.1 % (n = 143/2,028) at 8:00 A.M. and 7.2 % (n = 133/1,842) at 8:00 P.M. There was no statistically significant difference between the delirium prevalence assessed with valid (p = .770) or non-valid assessment (p = .643). The most frequent delirium assessments were the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (16.3 %, n = 28/172), the Confusion Assessment Method (15.7 %, n = 27/172) and the Delirium Observation Screening Scale (9.3 %, n = 16/172). The most reported interventions to provide delirium awareness and education were “delirium is mentioned in handovers” (53.5 %, n = 92/172), “availability of delirium experts” (51.2 %, n = 88/172) and “delirium education during the last year” (48.3 %, n = 83/172). An existing delirium management protocol was present in 76.7 % (n = 132/172) of participating wards. The most frequently reported barriers to delirium care were “shortage of staff” (45.3 %, n = 78/172), “patients who are difficult to assess” (32.6 %, n = 56/172), and “communication gaps between professions” (29.1 %, n = 50/172). As non-pharmacological interventions, “mobilization” (92.4 %, n = 159/172), “pain management” (87.8 %, n = 151/172), and “adequate fluids” (83.7 %, n = 144/172) were mostly reported.

Conclusions

Delirium is a frequent complication in patients in DACH countries. More than three quarter of participating wards reported a delirium management protocol suggesting awareness of published guidelines and best practice recommendations. Improved staffing, education on delirium assessment, and interprofessional communication could be helpful to improve the usage of valid delirium assessments and addressing barriers to delirium management.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
81 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信