Clinical correlation and prognostic impact of cytogenetic clone size for myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasm

Zhuoer Xie , Najla Al Ali , Ling Zhang , Peter Papenhausen , Virginia Olivia Volpe , Onyee Chan , Andrew Kuykendall , Seongseok Yun , Alison Walker , Kendra Sweet , Jeffrey E. Lancet , Eric Padron , David A. Sallman ∗ , Rami S. Komrokji ∗
{"title":"Clinical correlation and prognostic impact of cytogenetic clone size for myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasm","authors":"Zhuoer Xie ,&nbsp;Najla Al Ali ,&nbsp;Ling Zhang ,&nbsp;Peter Papenhausen ,&nbsp;Virginia Olivia Volpe ,&nbsp;Onyee Chan ,&nbsp;Andrew Kuykendall ,&nbsp;Seongseok Yun ,&nbsp;Alison Walker ,&nbsp;Kendra Sweet ,&nbsp;Jeffrey E. Lancet ,&nbsp;Eric Padron ,&nbsp;David A. Sallman ∗ ,&nbsp;Rami S. Komrokji ∗","doi":"10.1016/j.bneo.2024.100062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Abstract</h3><div>Most myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) risk stratification models dichotomize conventional cytogenetic abnormalities into present or absent, neglecting the prognostic impact of clone size (percentage of the total cells/metaphases harboring the chromosome abnormality). We investigated the prognostic value of clone size in 1001 patients with MDS using G-banding and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Clone size correlated with anemia severity and thrombocytosis in del(5q) cases, and with anemia and blast percentage in complex karyotypes. <em>TP53</em> mutation prevalence was significantly elevated in patients with clone size of ≥25% compared with those with &lt;25% (34.2% vs 3%; <em>P</em> = .07). Complex karyotypes with clone size of ≥75% demonstrated superior response to hypomethylating agents (20.8% vs 10%; <em>P</em> = .03). Crucially, clone size of ≥25% independently predicted overall survival and leukemia-free survival, regardless of revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) or molecular IPSS. Our findings establish clone size as a robust prognostic factor in MDS, warranting its integration into clinical practice and potential incorporation into risk stratification models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100189,"journal":{"name":"Blood Neoplasia","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100062"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Neoplasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950328024000621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) risk stratification models dichotomize conventional cytogenetic abnormalities into present or absent, neglecting the prognostic impact of clone size (percentage of the total cells/metaphases harboring the chromosome abnormality). We investigated the prognostic value of clone size in 1001 patients with MDS using G-banding and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Clone size correlated with anemia severity and thrombocytosis in del(5q) cases, and with anemia and blast percentage in complex karyotypes. TP53 mutation prevalence was significantly elevated in patients with clone size of ≥25% compared with those with <25% (34.2% vs 3%; P = .07). Complex karyotypes with clone size of ≥75% demonstrated superior response to hypomethylating agents (20.8% vs 10%; P = .03). Crucially, clone size of ≥25% independently predicted overall survival and leukemia-free survival, regardless of revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) or molecular IPSS. Our findings establish clone size as a robust prognostic factor in MDS, warranting its integration into clinical practice and potential incorporation into risk stratification models.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信