Knee arthrodesis with modular megaprosthesis as salvage procedure for the limb following in a patient with an infected knee tumor prosthesis: A case report

Q4 Medicine
Rodrigo Olivieri , Nicolás Franulic , Felipe Amoedo , José I. Laso , Tania Rojas , Carlos Rojas , Nicolás Gaggero
{"title":"Knee arthrodesis with modular megaprosthesis as salvage procedure for the limb following in a patient with an infected knee tumor prosthesis: A case report","authors":"Rodrigo Olivieri ,&nbsp;Nicolás Franulic ,&nbsp;Felipe Amoedo ,&nbsp;José I. Laso ,&nbsp;Tania Rojas ,&nbsp;Carlos Rojas ,&nbsp;Nicolás Gaggero","doi":"10.1016/j.tcr.2025.101152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The management of periprosthetic knee infections is a complex event, especially in the context of megaprostheses. An accepted option in these cases is knee arthrodesis, aiming to salvage the limb with acceptable and pain-free functionality. We present a successful case of knee arthrodesis using a hybrid model of modular nail-prosthesis in a patient with massive bone stock loss following the removal of an infected tumor-type prosthesis.</div></div><div><h3>Case presentation</h3><div>A 65-year-old male patient with a chronic periprosthetic infection related to a resection prosthesis implanted 5 years earlier, experiencing knee stiffness and presenting a massive bone stock deficit after prosthesis removal. Initial management involved an osteo-cement spacer and antibiotics, along with a transarticular external fixator. Subsequently, knee arthrodesis was performed using a hybrid model of modular nail-prosthesis, coupled with targeted antibiotic treatment. The arthrodesis was deemed successful, with a pain-free limb and no signs of infection recurrence at the 52-month follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In the scenario of infection and massive bone stock deficit, knee arthrodesis using intramedullary devices such as nails, megaprostheses, or hybrids is an alternative that can be successful if accompanied by appropriate medical-surgical management of the infection. This approach allows for earlier functional recovery compared to other techniques.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23291,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Case Reports","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 101152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352644025000299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The management of periprosthetic knee infections is a complex event, especially in the context of megaprostheses. An accepted option in these cases is knee arthrodesis, aiming to salvage the limb with acceptable and pain-free functionality. We present a successful case of knee arthrodesis using a hybrid model of modular nail-prosthesis in a patient with massive bone stock loss following the removal of an infected tumor-type prosthesis.

Case presentation

A 65-year-old male patient with a chronic periprosthetic infection related to a resection prosthesis implanted 5 years earlier, experiencing knee stiffness and presenting a massive bone stock deficit after prosthesis removal. Initial management involved an osteo-cement spacer and antibiotics, along with a transarticular external fixator. Subsequently, knee arthrodesis was performed using a hybrid model of modular nail-prosthesis, coupled with targeted antibiotic treatment. The arthrodesis was deemed successful, with a pain-free limb and no signs of infection recurrence at the 52-month follow-up.

Conclusion

In the scenario of infection and massive bone stock deficit, knee arthrodesis using intramedullary devices such as nails, megaprostheses, or hybrids is an alternative that can be successful if accompanied by appropriate medical-surgical management of the infection. This approach allows for earlier functional recovery compared to other techniques.
膝关节置换术联合模块化大假体作为修复感染膝关节肿瘤假体后肢体的手术:1例报告
假体周围膝关节感染的处理是一个复杂的事件,特别是在大型假体的背景下。在这些情况下,一个可接受的选择是膝关节置换术,目的是挽救具有可接受和无痛功能的肢体。我们提出了一个成功的案例,膝关节融合术使用混合模型的模块化钉假体在病人大量骨流失后,感染的肿瘤型假体移除。病例介绍:一名65岁男性患者,因5年前植入假体切除导致慢性假体周围感染,假体切除后出现膝关节僵硬和大量骨缺损。最初的治疗包括骨水泥间隔器和抗生素,以及经关节外固定架。随后,使用模块化甲假体混合模型进行膝关节融合术,并结合靶向抗生素治疗。关节融合术被认为是成功的,在52个月的随访中,肢体无痛,没有感染复发的迹象。结论在感染和大量骨缺损的情况下,使用髓内装置(如钉子、大型假体或混合假体)进行膝关节融合术是一种可以成功的选择,如果伴有适当的内科手术治疗感染。与其他技术相比,这种方法允许更早的功能恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trauma Case Reports
Trauma Case Reports Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Trauma Case Reports is the only open access, online journal dedicated to the publication of case reports in all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Case reports on all aspects of trauma management, surgical procedures for all tissues, resuscitation, anaesthesia and trauma and tissue healing will be considered for publication by the international editorial team and will be subject to peer review. Bringing together these cases from an international authorship will shed light on surgical problems and help in their effective resolution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信