Faster R-CNN model for target recognition and diagnosis of scapular fractures

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Qiong Fang , Anhong Jiang , Meimei Liu , Sen Zhao
{"title":"Faster R-CNN model for target recognition and diagnosis of scapular fractures","authors":"Qiong Fang ,&nbsp;Anhong Jiang ,&nbsp;Meimei Liu ,&nbsp;Sen Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.jbo.2025.100664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to establish a diagnostic model for scapular fractures using a convolutional neural network (CNN) and to discuss the clinical advantages of this model in diagnosing such complex conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Computed tomography (CT) images of 90 patients with scapular fractures were collected. A faster R-CNN-based recognition model was developed and compared with manual diagnosis. External validation was conducted to evaluate the model’s accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The CNN model, when combined with medical expert interpretation, demonstrated significantly higher specificity and positive predictive value compared to orthopedist-independent interpretation and algorithm-independent prediction (P &lt; 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) value of the combined approach was significantly higher than that of orthopedist-independent interpretation and algorithm-independent prediction groups, with statistically significant differences (P &lt; 0.05). The accuracy of the CNN algorithm model combined with orthopedist interpretation was 97.78 %, significantly higher than orthopedist-independent interpretation (82.95 %) and CNN algorithm-independent prediction (92.05 %) (P &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The CNN-based recognition model for scapular fractures can assist clinicians in improving their diagnostic accuracy and precision in identifying such fractures on CT images.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone Oncology","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 100664"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212137425000053","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to establish a diagnostic model for scapular fractures using a convolutional neural network (CNN) and to discuss the clinical advantages of this model in diagnosing such complex conditions.

Methods

Computed tomography (CT) images of 90 patients with scapular fractures were collected. A faster R-CNN-based recognition model was developed and compared with manual diagnosis. External validation was conducted to evaluate the model’s accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.

Results

The CNN model, when combined with medical expert interpretation, demonstrated significantly higher specificity and positive predictive value compared to orthopedist-independent interpretation and algorithm-independent prediction (P < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) value of the combined approach was significantly higher than that of orthopedist-independent interpretation and algorithm-independent prediction groups, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). The accuracy of the CNN algorithm model combined with orthopedist interpretation was 97.78 %, significantly higher than orthopedist-independent interpretation (82.95 %) and CNN algorithm-independent prediction (92.05 %) (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The CNN-based recognition model for scapular fractures can assist clinicians in improving their diagnostic accuracy and precision in identifying such fractures on CT images.
更快的R-CNN模型用于肩胛骨骨折的目标识别和诊断
目的建立基于卷积神经网络(CNN)的肩胛骨骨折诊断模型,并探讨该模型在诊断此类复杂疾病中的临床优势。方法收集90例肩胛骨骨折患者的CT图像。开发了一种基于r - cnn的快速识别模型,并与人工诊断进行了比较。外部验证评估模型的准确性、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果CNN模型与医学专家解读相结合,特异性和阳性预测值明显高于骨科独立解读和算法独立预测(P <;0.05)。联合入路的曲线下面积(AUC)值显著高于独立骨科医生解释组和独立算法预测组,差异有统计学意义(P <;0.05)。CNN算法模型结合骨科医生解译的准确率为97.78%,显著高于骨科医生独立解译(82.95%)和CNN算法独立预测(92.05%)(P <;0.05)。结论基于cnn的肩胛骨骨折识别模型可以帮助临床医生提高肩胛骨骨折CT图像识别的准确性和精密度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
50
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bone Oncology is a peer-reviewed international journal aimed at presenting basic, translational and clinical high-quality research related to bone and cancer. As the first journal dedicated to cancer induced bone diseases, JBO welcomes original research articles, review articles, editorials and opinion pieces. Case reports will only be considered in exceptional circumstances and only when accompanied by a comprehensive review of the subject. The areas covered by the journal include: Bone metastases (pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnostics, clinical features, prevention, treatment) Preclinical models of metastasis Bone microenvironment in cancer (stem cell, bone cell and cancer interactions) Bone targeted therapy (pharmacology, therapeutic targets, drug development, clinical trials, side-effects, outcome research, health economics) Cancer treatment induced bone loss (epidemiology, pathophysiology, prevention and management) Bone imaging (clinical and animal, skeletal interventional radiology) Bone biomarkers (clinical and translational applications) Radiotherapy and radio-isotopes Skeletal complications Bone pain (mechanisms and management) Orthopaedic cancer surgery Primary bone tumours Clinical guidelines Multidisciplinary care Keywords: bisphosphonate, bone, breast cancer, cancer, CTIBL, denosumab, metastasis, myeloma, osteoblast, osteoclast, osteooncology, osteo-oncology, prostate cancer, skeleton, tumour.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信