Zigang Chen , Yuening Zhou , Zhen Wang , Fan Liu , Tao Leng , Haihua Zhu
{"title":"A bias evaluation solution for multiple sensitive attribute speech recognition","authors":"Zigang Chen , Yuening Zhou , Zhen Wang , Fan Liu , Tao Leng , Haihua Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.csl.2025.101787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Speech recognition systems are a pervasive application in the field of <span><math><mrow><mi>A</mi><mi>I</mi></mrow></math></span> (Artificial Intelligence), bringing significant benefits to society. However, they also face significant fairness issues. When dealing with groups of people with different sensitive attributes, these systems tend to exhibit bias, which may lead to the misinterpretation or ignoring of the voice of a specific group of people. In order to address the fairness issue, it becomes crucial to comprehensively reveal the presence of bias in AI systems. To address the issues of limited categories and data imbalance in existing bias evaluation datasets, we propose a new method for constructing evaluation datasets. Given the unique characteristics of speech recognition systems, we find that existing AI bias evaluation methods may not be directly applicable. Therefore, we introduce a bias evaluation method for speech recognition systems based on <span><math><mrow><mi>W</mi><mi>E</mi><mi>R</mi></mrow></math></span> (Word Error Rate). To comprehensively quantify bias across different groups, we combine multiple evaluation metrics, including WER, fairness metrics, and <span><math><mrow><mi>C</mi><mi>M</mi><mi>B</mi><mi>M</mi></mrow></math></span> (confusion matrix-based metrics). To ensure a thorough evaluation, experiments were conducted on both single sensitive attributes and cross-sensitive attributes. The experimental results indicate that, for single sensitive attributes, the speech recognition system exhibits the most significant racial bias, while in the evaluation of cross-sensitive attributes, the system shows the greatest bias against white males and black males. Finally, through T-tests, we demonstrate that the WER differences between these two groups are statistically significant.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50638,"journal":{"name":"Computer Speech and Language","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 101787"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Speech and Language","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885230825000129","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Speech recognition systems are a pervasive application in the field of (Artificial Intelligence), bringing significant benefits to society. However, they also face significant fairness issues. When dealing with groups of people with different sensitive attributes, these systems tend to exhibit bias, which may lead to the misinterpretation or ignoring of the voice of a specific group of people. In order to address the fairness issue, it becomes crucial to comprehensively reveal the presence of bias in AI systems. To address the issues of limited categories and data imbalance in existing bias evaluation datasets, we propose a new method for constructing evaluation datasets. Given the unique characteristics of speech recognition systems, we find that existing AI bias evaluation methods may not be directly applicable. Therefore, we introduce a bias evaluation method for speech recognition systems based on (Word Error Rate). To comprehensively quantify bias across different groups, we combine multiple evaluation metrics, including WER, fairness metrics, and (confusion matrix-based metrics). To ensure a thorough evaluation, experiments were conducted on both single sensitive attributes and cross-sensitive attributes. The experimental results indicate that, for single sensitive attributes, the speech recognition system exhibits the most significant racial bias, while in the evaluation of cross-sensitive attributes, the system shows the greatest bias against white males and black males. Finally, through T-tests, we demonstrate that the WER differences between these two groups are statistically significant.
期刊介绍:
Computer Speech & Language publishes reports of original research related to the recognition, understanding, production, coding and mining of speech and language.
The speech and language sciences have a long history, but it is only relatively recently that large-scale implementation of and experimentation with complex models of speech and language processing has become feasible. Such research is often carried out somewhat separately by practitioners of artificial intelligence, computer science, electronic engineering, information retrieval, linguistics, phonetics, or psychology.