Simplifying Universal Pediatric Pre-operative Anesthesia Screening: Analysis of NSQIP Data to Evaluate the NARCO Score as a Tool for Pediatric Anesthesia Risk Stratification

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Gillian Michaelson , Lucille Hu , Shelley Ohliger , Anuja Sarode , Eiichi Miyasaka , Anne K. Mackow
{"title":"Simplifying Universal Pediatric Pre-operative Anesthesia Screening: Analysis of NSQIP Data to Evaluate the NARCO Score as a Tool for Pediatric Anesthesia Risk Stratification","authors":"Gillian Michaelson ,&nbsp;Lucille Hu ,&nbsp;Shelley Ohliger ,&nbsp;Anuja Sarode ,&nbsp;Eiichi Miyasaka ,&nbsp;Anne K. Mackow","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Universal pre-operative anesthesia screening may be resource-prohibitive and burdensome to hospitals and patients. However, patients at greatest anesthetic risk cannot be identified without some basis for risk-stratification.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>This study investigated if a modified version of the Neurological, Airway, Respiratory, Cardiovascular, and Other (NARCO) pre-surgical pediatric risk score could stratify patients into high- and low-anesthetic-risk groups that would be predictive of perioperative adverse events.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using 132,881 records from the pediatric database of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2019 ACS NSQIP-P®). Recorded comorbidities were assigned NARCO categories and presumptive NARCO scores based on non-granular data. Two methodologies were used--one in which non-granular comorbidities were considered high-risk (overestimating the high-risk group) and another in which these were considered low-risk (overestimating the low-risk group). These groups were evaluated by demographic and adverse outcome data using chi-square or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney analyses (<em>p</em> &lt; <em>0.05</em>).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both methodologies accurately reflected overestimation of high- or low-risk patients, when comparing NARCO to ASA scores. In both methodologies, the occurrences of 23 of 24 adverse events were significantly (p &lt; 0.05) associated with the high-risk group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A modified version of the NARCO pre-surgical risk assessment can stratify pediatric patients into high- and low-risk groups based on non-granular patient data. In both methodologies, this stratification identifies patients at highest risk for perioperative adverse events, which is a marker for those who require more intensive pre-surgical screening.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study</h3><div>Retrospective cohort study using de-identified information from a large.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>3.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric surgery","volume":"60 5","pages":"Article 162248"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022346825000934","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Universal pre-operative anesthesia screening may be resource-prohibitive and burdensome to hospitals and patients. However, patients at greatest anesthetic risk cannot be identified without some basis for risk-stratification.

Aims

This study investigated if a modified version of the Neurological, Airway, Respiratory, Cardiovascular, and Other (NARCO) pre-surgical pediatric risk score could stratify patients into high- and low-anesthetic-risk groups that would be predictive of perioperative adverse events.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using 132,881 records from the pediatric database of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2019 ACS NSQIP-P®). Recorded comorbidities were assigned NARCO categories and presumptive NARCO scores based on non-granular data. Two methodologies were used--one in which non-granular comorbidities were considered high-risk (overestimating the high-risk group) and another in which these were considered low-risk (overestimating the low-risk group). These groups were evaluated by demographic and adverse outcome data using chi-square or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney analyses (p < 0.05).

Results

Both methodologies accurately reflected overestimation of high- or low-risk patients, when comparing NARCO to ASA scores. In both methodologies, the occurrences of 23 of 24 adverse events were significantly (p < 0.05) associated with the high-risk group.

Conclusion

A modified version of the NARCO pre-surgical risk assessment can stratify pediatric patients into high- and low-risk groups based on non-granular patient data. In both methodologies, this stratification identifies patients at highest risk for perioperative adverse events, which is a marker for those who require more intensive pre-surgical screening.

Type of study

Retrospective cohort study using de-identified information from a large.

Level of evidence

3.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
569
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The journal presents original contributions as well as a complete international abstracts section and other special departments to provide the most current source of information and references in pediatric surgery. The journal is based on the need to improve the surgical care of infants and children, not only through advances in physiology, pathology and surgical techniques, but also by attention to the unique emotional and physical needs of the young patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信