Simplifying Universal Pediatric Pre-operative Anesthesia Screening: Analysis of NSQIP Data to Evaluate the NARCO Score as a Tool for Pediatric Anesthesia Risk Stratification
Gillian Michaelson , Lucille Hu , Shelley Ohliger , Anuja Sarode , Eiichi Miyasaka , Anne K. Mackow
{"title":"Simplifying Universal Pediatric Pre-operative Anesthesia Screening: Analysis of NSQIP Data to Evaluate the NARCO Score as a Tool for Pediatric Anesthesia Risk Stratification","authors":"Gillian Michaelson , Lucille Hu , Shelley Ohliger , Anuja Sarode , Eiichi Miyasaka , Anne K. Mackow","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Universal pre-operative anesthesia screening may be resource-prohibitive and burdensome to hospitals and patients. However, patients at greatest anesthetic risk cannot be identified without some basis for risk-stratification.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>This study investigated if a modified version of the Neurological, Airway, Respiratory, Cardiovascular, and Other (NARCO) pre-surgical pediatric risk score could stratify patients into high- and low-anesthetic-risk groups that would be predictive of perioperative adverse events.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using 132,881 records from the pediatric database of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2019 ACS NSQIP-P®). Recorded comorbidities were assigned NARCO categories and presumptive NARCO scores based on non-granular data. Two methodologies were used--one in which non-granular comorbidities were considered high-risk (overestimating the high-risk group) and another in which these were considered low-risk (overestimating the low-risk group). These groups were evaluated by demographic and adverse outcome data using chi-square or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney analyses (<em>p</em> < <em>0.05</em>).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both methodologies accurately reflected overestimation of high- or low-risk patients, when comparing NARCO to ASA scores. In both methodologies, the occurrences of 23 of 24 adverse events were significantly (p < 0.05) associated with the high-risk group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A modified version of the NARCO pre-surgical risk assessment can stratify pediatric patients into high- and low-risk groups based on non-granular patient data. In both methodologies, this stratification identifies patients at highest risk for perioperative adverse events, which is a marker for those who require more intensive pre-surgical screening.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study</h3><div>Retrospective cohort study using de-identified information from a large.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>3.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric surgery","volume":"60 5","pages":"Article 162248"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022346825000934","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Universal pre-operative anesthesia screening may be resource-prohibitive and burdensome to hospitals and patients. However, patients at greatest anesthetic risk cannot be identified without some basis for risk-stratification.
Aims
This study investigated if a modified version of the Neurological, Airway, Respiratory, Cardiovascular, and Other (NARCO) pre-surgical pediatric risk score could stratify patients into high- and low-anesthetic-risk groups that would be predictive of perioperative adverse events.
Methods
A retrospective cohort study was conducted using 132,881 records from the pediatric database of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2019 ACS NSQIP-P®). Recorded comorbidities were assigned NARCO categories and presumptive NARCO scores based on non-granular data. Two methodologies were used--one in which non-granular comorbidities were considered high-risk (overestimating the high-risk group) and another in which these were considered low-risk (overestimating the low-risk group). These groups were evaluated by demographic and adverse outcome data using chi-square or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney analyses (p < 0.05).
Results
Both methodologies accurately reflected overestimation of high- or low-risk patients, when comparing NARCO to ASA scores. In both methodologies, the occurrences of 23 of 24 adverse events were significantly (p < 0.05) associated with the high-risk group.
Conclusion
A modified version of the NARCO pre-surgical risk assessment can stratify pediatric patients into high- and low-risk groups based on non-granular patient data. In both methodologies, this stratification identifies patients at highest risk for perioperative adverse events, which is a marker for those who require more intensive pre-surgical screening.
Type of study
Retrospective cohort study using de-identified information from a large.
期刊介绍:
The journal presents original contributions as well as a complete international abstracts section and other special departments to provide the most current source of information and references in pediatric surgery. The journal is based on the need to improve the surgical care of infants and children, not only through advances in physiology, pathology and surgical techniques, but also by attention to the unique emotional and physical needs of the young patient.