Managing equitable contagious disease testing: A mathematical model for resource optimization

IF 6.7 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Peiman Ghasemi , Jan Fabian Ehmke , Martin Bicher
{"title":"Managing equitable contagious disease testing: A mathematical model for resource optimization","authors":"Peiman Ghasemi ,&nbsp;Jan Fabian Ehmke ,&nbsp;Martin Bicher","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2025.103305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>All nations in the world were under tremendous economic and logistical strain as a result of the advent of COVID-19. Early in the epidemic, getting COVID-19 diagnostic tests was a significant difficulty. Furthermore, logistical challenges arose from the restricted transportation infrastructure and disruptions in international supply chains in the distribution of these testing kits. In the face of such obstacles, it is critical to give patients' needs top priority in order to provide fair access to testing. In order to manage contagious disease testing, this work proposes a bi-objective and multi-period mathematical model with an emphasis on mobile tester route plans and testing resource allocation. In order to optimize patient scores and reduce the likelihood of patients going untreated, the suggested team orienteering model takes into account issues like resource limitations, geographic clustering, and testing capacity limitations. To this aim, we present a comparison between quarantine and non-quarantine scenarios, introduce an equitable categorization based on disease backgrounds into “standard” and “risky” groups, and cluster geographical locations according to average age and contact rate. We use a Multi-Objective Variable Neighborhood Search (MOVNS) and a Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) to solve our problem. Due to the superiority of MOVNS, it is applied to a case study in Vienna, Austria. The results demonstrate that, over the course of several weeks, the average number of unserved risky patients in the prioritizing scenario is consistently lower than the usual number of patients. In the absence of prioritization, the average number of high-risk patients who remain untreated rises sharply and exceeds that of regular patients, though. Furthermore, it is clear that waiting times are greatly impacted by demand volume when comparing scenarios with and without quarantine.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 103305"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048325000313","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

All nations in the world were under tremendous economic and logistical strain as a result of the advent of COVID-19. Early in the epidemic, getting COVID-19 diagnostic tests was a significant difficulty. Furthermore, logistical challenges arose from the restricted transportation infrastructure and disruptions in international supply chains in the distribution of these testing kits. In the face of such obstacles, it is critical to give patients' needs top priority in order to provide fair access to testing. In order to manage contagious disease testing, this work proposes a bi-objective and multi-period mathematical model with an emphasis on mobile tester route plans and testing resource allocation. In order to optimize patient scores and reduce the likelihood of patients going untreated, the suggested team orienteering model takes into account issues like resource limitations, geographic clustering, and testing capacity limitations. To this aim, we present a comparison between quarantine and non-quarantine scenarios, introduce an equitable categorization based on disease backgrounds into “standard” and “risky” groups, and cluster geographical locations according to average age and contact rate. We use a Multi-Objective Variable Neighborhood Search (MOVNS) and a Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) to solve our problem. Due to the superiority of MOVNS, it is applied to a case study in Vienna, Austria. The results demonstrate that, over the course of several weeks, the average number of unserved risky patients in the prioritizing scenario is consistently lower than the usual number of patients. In the absence of prioritization, the average number of high-risk patients who remain untreated rises sharply and exceeds that of regular patients, though. Furthermore, it is clear that waiting times are greatly impacted by demand volume when comparing scenarios with and without quarantine.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Omega-international Journal of Management Science
Omega-international Journal of Management Science 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
11.60%
发文量
130
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信