Effects of acoustic stimulation on painful procedures in preterm and full-term infants: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Shenglan Ding , Qingxia Wang , Xiujuan Fu , Xiuhua Huang , Luxi Liao , Yilan Zhang
{"title":"Effects of acoustic stimulation on painful procedures in preterm and full-term infants: A systematic review and network meta-analysis","authors":"Shenglan Ding ,&nbsp;Qingxia Wang ,&nbsp;Xiujuan Fu ,&nbsp;Xiuhua Huang ,&nbsp;Luxi Liao ,&nbsp;Yilan Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aims to compare and rank the effects of acoustic stimulation on painful procedures in both preterm and full-term infants.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Six databases including Medline, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, and SinoMed, were searched from inception to July, 2023. A Bayesian network meta-analysis with random effects models was performed using R software and Stata 15.0. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42023451102).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 28 studies involving 2624 preterm and full-term infants were included and 8 acoustic stimulation interventions were identified. Regarding pain levels during procedures, maternal voice, maternal voice plus, music therapy and maternal voice plus, music therapy plus, other pharmaceutical interventions, vocal music therapy, white noise, and white noise plus were significantly more effective than control group [standardized mean differences (SMD) ranged from −<!--> <!-->2.6 to −<!--> <!-->0.87]. White noise plus was the most effective intervention for reducing pain levels during procedures (90.6 %). Regarding pain levels after procedures (no specific time mentioned), maternal voice, maternal voice plus, music therapy and maternal voice plus, music therapy plus, other pharmaceutical interventions, other non-pharmaceutical interventions, routine care, vocal music therapy, and white noise plus were significantly more effective than control group (SMD ranged from −<!--> <!-->4.7 to −<!--> <!-->1.6). Music therapy and maternal voice plus was the most effective intervention for reducing pain levels after procedures, without specific time mentioned (95.29 %). Regarding pain levels 1 min after procedures, only music therapy plus and other pharmaceutical interventions were effective (SMD ranged from −<!--> <!-->4.5 to −<!--> <!-->4.9) and music therapy plus was the most effective intervention (93.41 %). No interventions had significant effects on pain levels 3, 5, and 10 min after procedures. Regarding heart rate, only white noise plus could provide a lower increase during procedures. For oxygen saturation, only vocal music therapy could provide a lower decrease after painful procedures (no specific time mentioned). No interventions had significant effects on stabilizing respiratory rate.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This review suggests that multiple acoustic stimulation interventions are effective for pain relief in both preterm and full-term infants undergoing painful procedures. More high quality studies with larger sample size are required to generate evidence regarding the short- and long-term effectiveness and safety of acoustic stimulation interventions on painful procedures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 105031"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748925000409","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

This study aims to compare and rank the effects of acoustic stimulation on painful procedures in both preterm and full-term infants.

Methods

Six databases including Medline, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, and SinoMed, were searched from inception to July, 2023. A Bayesian network meta-analysis with random effects models was performed using R software and Stata 15.0. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42023451102).

Results

A total of 28 studies involving 2624 preterm and full-term infants were included and 8 acoustic stimulation interventions were identified. Regarding pain levels during procedures, maternal voice, maternal voice plus, music therapy and maternal voice plus, music therapy plus, other pharmaceutical interventions, vocal music therapy, white noise, and white noise plus were significantly more effective than control group [standardized mean differences (SMD) ranged from − 2.6 to − 0.87]. White noise plus was the most effective intervention for reducing pain levels during procedures (90.6 %). Regarding pain levels after procedures (no specific time mentioned), maternal voice, maternal voice plus, music therapy and maternal voice plus, music therapy plus, other pharmaceutical interventions, other non-pharmaceutical interventions, routine care, vocal music therapy, and white noise plus were significantly more effective than control group (SMD ranged from − 4.7 to − 1.6). Music therapy and maternal voice plus was the most effective intervention for reducing pain levels after procedures, without specific time mentioned (95.29 %). Regarding pain levels 1 min after procedures, only music therapy plus and other pharmaceutical interventions were effective (SMD ranged from − 4.5 to − 4.9) and music therapy plus was the most effective intervention (93.41 %). No interventions had significant effects on pain levels 3, 5, and 10 min after procedures. Regarding heart rate, only white noise plus could provide a lower increase during procedures. For oxygen saturation, only vocal music therapy could provide a lower decrease after painful procedures (no specific time mentioned). No interventions had significant effects on stabilizing respiratory rate.

Conclusion

This review suggests that multiple acoustic stimulation interventions are effective for pain relief in both preterm and full-term infants undergoing painful procedures. More high quality studies with larger sample size are required to generate evidence regarding the short- and long-term effectiveness and safety of acoustic stimulation interventions on painful procedures.
声刺激对早产儿和足月婴儿疼痛过程的影响:系统回顾和网络荟萃分析
目的比较声刺激对早产儿和足月儿疼痛过程的影响。方法检索Medline、Web of Science、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库、护理与相关健康文献累积索引、Embase、中国医学信息数据库(sinmed)等6个数据库,检索时间为建库至2023年7月。采用R软件和Stata 15.0进行随机效应模型贝叶斯网络元分析。使用Cochrane协作工具评估纳入研究的质量。研究方案已在PROSPERO注册(注册号:CRD42023451102)。结果共纳入28项研究,涉及早产儿和足月儿2624例,确定了8项声刺激干预措施。关于手术过程中的疼痛水平,母声、母声+、音乐治疗和母声+、音乐治疗+、其他药物干预、声乐治疗、白噪声和白噪声+明显比对照组更有效[标准化平均差异(SMD)范围为−2.6至−0.87]。白噪音加治疗是减少手术过程中疼痛程度最有效的干预(90.6%)。关于手术后的疼痛水平(未提及具体时间),母声、母声+、音乐治疗和母声+、音乐治疗+、其他药物干预、其他非药物干预、常规护理、声乐治疗和白噪音加明显比对照组更有效(SMD范围为- 4.7至- 1.6)。音乐治疗和母声治疗是减轻术后疼痛程度最有效的干预措施,未提及具体时间(95.29%)。关于手术后1分钟的疼痛水平,只有音乐治疗+和其他药物干预有效(SMD范围从- 4.5到- 4.9),音乐治疗+是最有效的干预(93.41%)。没有干预措施对手术后3、5和10分钟的疼痛水平有显著影响。在心率方面,只有加白噪声能在手术过程中提供较低的增加。对于血氧饱和度,只有声乐治疗可以在疼痛手术后提供较低的降低(没有具体的时间提到)。没有干预措施对稳定呼吸频率有显著效果。结论:多种声刺激干预对早产儿和足月婴儿进行疼痛治疗均有效。需要更多大样本量的高质量研究来证明声刺激干预疼痛过程的短期和长期有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
181
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Studies (IJNS) is a highly respected journal that has been publishing original peer-reviewed articles since 1963. It provides a forum for original research and scholarship about health care delivery, organisation, management, workforce, policy, and research methods relevant to nursing, midwifery, and other health related professions. The journal aims to support evidence informed policy and practice by publishing research, systematic and other scholarly reviews, critical discussion, and commentary of the highest standard. The IJNS is indexed in major databases including PubMed, Medline, Thomson Reuters - Science Citation Index, Scopus, Thomson Reuters - Social Science Citation Index, CINAHL, and the BNI (British Nursing Index).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信