Assessing the applicability of diver-based surveys for monitoring fish populations in lentic lakes

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES
Michaela Holubová , Jiří Richta , Martin Čech , Lukáš Vejřík , Vladislav Draštík , Luboš Kočvara , Jiří Peterka
{"title":"Assessing the applicability of diver-based surveys for monitoring fish populations in lentic lakes","authors":"Michaela Holubová ,&nbsp;Jiří Richta ,&nbsp;Martin Čech ,&nbsp;Lukáš Vejřík ,&nbsp;Vladislav Draštík ,&nbsp;Luboš Kočvara ,&nbsp;Jiří Peterka","doi":"10.1016/j.fishres.2025.107308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Giving the increasing degradation of aquatic ecosystem, it is important to prioritise harmless methods when selecting appropriate research gear. This study confirmed that Underwater Visual Census (UVC) using SCUBA divers and parallel, depth-stratified transects can produce results comparable to standardized gillnet sampling in terms of fish species proportions in lentic freshwater ecosystems with sufficient water transparency. The proportions of young-of-the-year (YOY) fish were similar between the two methods. In older fish, the species proportions showed minor, non-significant variations between methods. Despite some variability in performance during UVC surveys, this variation is not necessarily indicative of an error but may reflect natural fluctuations in fish distribution. Notably, UVC detected a significantly higher number of fish individuals compared to gillnets. Our findings suggest that UVC is a viable, non-invasive alternative to gillnets for surveying nearshore fish populations, providing comparable data quality with negligible impact on the fish community.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50443,"journal":{"name":"Fisheries Research","volume":"284 ","pages":"Article 107308"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisheries Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783625000451","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Giving the increasing degradation of aquatic ecosystem, it is important to prioritise harmless methods when selecting appropriate research gear. This study confirmed that Underwater Visual Census (UVC) using SCUBA divers and parallel, depth-stratified transects can produce results comparable to standardized gillnet sampling in terms of fish species proportions in lentic freshwater ecosystems with sufficient water transparency. The proportions of young-of-the-year (YOY) fish were similar between the two methods. In older fish, the species proportions showed minor, non-significant variations between methods. Despite some variability in performance during UVC surveys, this variation is not necessarily indicative of an error but may reflect natural fluctuations in fish distribution. Notably, UVC detected a significantly higher number of fish individuals compared to gillnets. Our findings suggest that UVC is a viable, non-invasive alternative to gillnets for surveying nearshore fish populations, providing comparable data quality with negligible impact on the fish community.
评估潜水员调查对监测湖泊鱼类种群的适用性
鉴于水生生态系统的日益退化,在选择合适的研究设备时,优先考虑无害的方法是很重要的。该研究证实,在具有足够水透明度的淡水生态系统中,使用水肺潜水员和平行的深度分层样带进行水下视觉普查(UVC)可以产生与标准化刺网采样相当的结果。两种方法的年幼鱼比例相似。在较老的鱼类中,不同方法之间的物种比例差异不大,不显著。尽管在UVC调查期间的表现存在一些差异,但这种差异并不一定表明存在误差,而可能反映了鱼类分布的自然波动。值得注意的是,与刺网相比,UVC检测到的鱼个体数量明显更高。我们的研究结果表明,UVC是一种可行的、非侵入性的刺网替代方法,可用于调查近岸鱼类种群,提供可比较的数据质量,对鱼类群落的影响可以忽略不计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fisheries Research
Fisheries Research 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
294
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal provides an international forum for the publication of papers in the areas of fisheries science, fishing technology, fisheries management and relevant socio-economics. The scope covers fisheries in salt, brackish and freshwater systems, and all aspects of associated ecology, environmental aspects of fisheries, and economics. Both theoretical and practical papers are acceptable, including laboratory and field experimental studies relevant to fisheries. Papers on the conservation of exploitable living resources are welcome. Review and Viewpoint articles are also published. As the specified areas inevitably impinge on and interrelate with each other, the approach of the journal is multidisciplinary, and authors are encouraged to emphasise the relevance of their own work to that of other disciplines. The journal is intended for fisheries scientists, biological oceanographers, gear technologists, economists, managers, administrators, policy makers and legislators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信