Does increased complexity improve performance: Evaluating a constrained biomass dynamics model and an empirical harvest control rule

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES
Pia Bessell-Browne , André E. Punt , Miriana Sporcic , Geoffrey N. Tuck , L. Richard Little
{"title":"Does increased complexity improve performance: Evaluating a constrained biomass dynamics model and an empirical harvest control rule","authors":"Pia Bessell-Browne ,&nbsp;André E. Punt ,&nbsp;Miriana Sporcic ,&nbsp;Geoffrey N. Tuck ,&nbsp;L. Richard Little","doi":"10.1016/j.fishres.2025.107317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biomass dynamics models are a common stock assessment method applied in-data limited situations. We present a management strategy based on a new constrained biomass dynamics model (‘dynamic tier 4’) as an alternative to the currently applied empirical management strategy (‘empirical tier 4’) used in Australia’s Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery (SESSF). The dynamic tier 4 management strategy is constrained because the biomass dynamics model on which it is based involves the assumption that yield corresponding to the biomass target occurred during a pre-specified set of reference years. This is the same assumption that is made by the empirical tier 4 management strategy. Management strategy evaluation is used to evaluate performance among three ways of accounting for error when fitting the dynamic tier 4 approach, and to evaluate performance against the empirical tier 4 management strategy as well as a management strategy based on an integrated assessment implemented using Stock Synthesis (‘tier 1’). Finally, the sensitivity of the empirical tier 4 and dynamic tier 4 management strategies to an incorrect choice for the pre-specified reference years is explored. The results demonstrate improved performance by the dynamic tier 4 management strategy compared to the empirical tier 4 management strategy. As expected, the data-rich, tier 1 management strategy had the best performance. The dynamic tier 4 management strategy has a reduced probability of the stock falling below the limit reference point, reduced catch variability and is less sensitive to incorrect reference year choice than the empirical tier 4 management strategy. These results demonstrate that the dynamic tier 4 management strategy is a suitable alternative to the empirical tier 4 management strategy in the SESSF, and more generally, can be considered as a robust option for forming the basis for management recommendations for data-limited situations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50443,"journal":{"name":"Fisheries Research","volume":"284 ","pages":"Article 107317"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisheries Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783625000542","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biomass dynamics models are a common stock assessment method applied in-data limited situations. We present a management strategy based on a new constrained biomass dynamics model (‘dynamic tier 4’) as an alternative to the currently applied empirical management strategy (‘empirical tier 4’) used in Australia’s Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery (SESSF). The dynamic tier 4 management strategy is constrained because the biomass dynamics model on which it is based involves the assumption that yield corresponding to the biomass target occurred during a pre-specified set of reference years. This is the same assumption that is made by the empirical tier 4 management strategy. Management strategy evaluation is used to evaluate performance among three ways of accounting for error when fitting the dynamic tier 4 approach, and to evaluate performance against the empirical tier 4 management strategy as well as a management strategy based on an integrated assessment implemented using Stock Synthesis (‘tier 1’). Finally, the sensitivity of the empirical tier 4 and dynamic tier 4 management strategies to an incorrect choice for the pre-specified reference years is explored. The results demonstrate improved performance by the dynamic tier 4 management strategy compared to the empirical tier 4 management strategy. As expected, the data-rich, tier 1 management strategy had the best performance. The dynamic tier 4 management strategy has a reduced probability of the stock falling below the limit reference point, reduced catch variability and is less sensitive to incorrect reference year choice than the empirical tier 4 management strategy. These results demonstrate that the dynamic tier 4 management strategy is a suitable alternative to the empirical tier 4 management strategy in the SESSF, and more generally, can be considered as a robust option for forming the basis for management recommendations for data-limited situations.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fisheries Research
Fisheries Research 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
294
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal provides an international forum for the publication of papers in the areas of fisheries science, fishing technology, fisheries management and relevant socio-economics. The scope covers fisheries in salt, brackish and freshwater systems, and all aspects of associated ecology, environmental aspects of fisheries, and economics. Both theoretical and practical papers are acceptable, including laboratory and field experimental studies relevant to fisheries. Papers on the conservation of exploitable living resources are welcome. Review and Viewpoint articles are also published. As the specified areas inevitably impinge on and interrelate with each other, the approach of the journal is multidisciplinary, and authors are encouraged to emphasise the relevance of their own work to that of other disciplines. The journal is intended for fisheries scientists, biological oceanographers, gear technologists, economists, managers, administrators, policy makers and legislators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信