Pia Bessell-Browne , André E. Punt , Miriana Sporcic , Geoffrey N. Tuck , L. Richard Little
{"title":"Does increased complexity improve performance: Evaluating a constrained biomass dynamics model and an empirical harvest control rule","authors":"Pia Bessell-Browne , André E. Punt , Miriana Sporcic , Geoffrey N. Tuck , L. Richard Little","doi":"10.1016/j.fishres.2025.107317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biomass dynamics models are a common stock assessment method applied in-data limited situations. We present a management strategy based on a new constrained biomass dynamics model (‘dynamic tier 4’) as an alternative to the currently applied empirical management strategy (‘empirical tier 4’) used in Australia’s Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery (SESSF). The dynamic tier 4 management strategy is constrained because the biomass dynamics model on which it is based involves the assumption that yield corresponding to the biomass target occurred during a pre-specified set of reference years. This is the same assumption that is made by the empirical tier 4 management strategy. Management strategy evaluation is used to evaluate performance among three ways of accounting for error when fitting the dynamic tier 4 approach, and to evaluate performance against the empirical tier 4 management strategy as well as a management strategy based on an integrated assessment implemented using Stock Synthesis (‘tier 1’). Finally, the sensitivity of the empirical tier 4 and dynamic tier 4 management strategies to an incorrect choice for the pre-specified reference years is explored. The results demonstrate improved performance by the dynamic tier 4 management strategy compared to the empirical tier 4 management strategy. As expected, the data-rich, tier 1 management strategy had the best performance. The dynamic tier 4 management strategy has a reduced probability of the stock falling below the limit reference point, reduced catch variability and is less sensitive to incorrect reference year choice than the empirical tier 4 management strategy. These results demonstrate that the dynamic tier 4 management strategy is a suitable alternative to the empirical tier 4 management strategy in the SESSF, and more generally, can be considered as a robust option for forming the basis for management recommendations for data-limited situations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50443,"journal":{"name":"Fisheries Research","volume":"284 ","pages":"Article 107317"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisheries Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783625000542","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Biomass dynamics models are a common stock assessment method applied in-data limited situations. We present a management strategy based on a new constrained biomass dynamics model (‘dynamic tier 4’) as an alternative to the currently applied empirical management strategy (‘empirical tier 4’) used in Australia’s Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery (SESSF). The dynamic tier 4 management strategy is constrained because the biomass dynamics model on which it is based involves the assumption that yield corresponding to the biomass target occurred during a pre-specified set of reference years. This is the same assumption that is made by the empirical tier 4 management strategy. Management strategy evaluation is used to evaluate performance among three ways of accounting for error when fitting the dynamic tier 4 approach, and to evaluate performance against the empirical tier 4 management strategy as well as a management strategy based on an integrated assessment implemented using Stock Synthesis (‘tier 1’). Finally, the sensitivity of the empirical tier 4 and dynamic tier 4 management strategies to an incorrect choice for the pre-specified reference years is explored. The results demonstrate improved performance by the dynamic tier 4 management strategy compared to the empirical tier 4 management strategy. As expected, the data-rich, tier 1 management strategy had the best performance. The dynamic tier 4 management strategy has a reduced probability of the stock falling below the limit reference point, reduced catch variability and is less sensitive to incorrect reference year choice than the empirical tier 4 management strategy. These results demonstrate that the dynamic tier 4 management strategy is a suitable alternative to the empirical tier 4 management strategy in the SESSF, and more generally, can be considered as a robust option for forming the basis for management recommendations for data-limited situations.
期刊介绍:
This journal provides an international forum for the publication of papers in the areas of fisheries science, fishing technology, fisheries management and relevant socio-economics. The scope covers fisheries in salt, brackish and freshwater systems, and all aspects of associated ecology, environmental aspects of fisheries, and economics. Both theoretical and practical papers are acceptable, including laboratory and field experimental studies relevant to fisheries. Papers on the conservation of exploitable living resources are welcome. Review and Viewpoint articles are also published. As the specified areas inevitably impinge on and interrelate with each other, the approach of the journal is multidisciplinary, and authors are encouraged to emphasise the relevance of their own work to that of other disciplines. The journal is intended for fisheries scientists, biological oceanographers, gear technologists, economists, managers, administrators, policy makers and legislators.