Teaming up with robots: Analysing potential and challenges with healthcare workers and defining teamwork

Anna M.H. Abrams, Lena Plum, Astrid M. Rosenthal-von der Pütten
{"title":"Teaming up with robots: Analysing potential and challenges with healthcare workers and defining teamwork","authors":"Anna M.H. Abrams,&nbsp;Lena Plum,&nbsp;Astrid M. Rosenthal-von der Pütten","doi":"10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In interviews with healthcare workers, we explore the potential and challenges of future deployment of robotic assistance systems in healthcare. We focus on individual expectations, wishes and fears. We especially emphasize the potential role of robotic systems in team dynamics. Will robots be coworkers in the future or are they expected to be tools? Irrespective of that, are they anticipated to change coworking within a team? Following a grounded theoretical approach, we aim to generate new theories and research questions on robotic assistance systems from the perspective of healthcare workers. We find that healthcare workers are generally optimistic about the implementation of technology in their workplace and not all have pressing concerns. Paradoxically, we further find that reasoning for why a robot could be part of a team are similar among participants who are opposed to robots in teams and those who are in favour. While participants only focused on work- and task-related criteria when arguing why a robot could be a future colleague, they presented work-and task-unrelated criteria for why a robot could not be one. We discuss the expected impact of robotic assistance systems on work teams in healthcare and pose resulting questions to inspire future hypothetico-inferential research on human-robot teams. We conclude with arguing why current team definitions do not fit human-robot teams and propose a new theoretical model for teams that include humans and robots.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100324,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882125000209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In interviews with healthcare workers, we explore the potential and challenges of future deployment of robotic assistance systems in healthcare. We focus on individual expectations, wishes and fears. We especially emphasize the potential role of robotic systems in team dynamics. Will robots be coworkers in the future or are they expected to be tools? Irrespective of that, are they anticipated to change coworking within a team? Following a grounded theoretical approach, we aim to generate new theories and research questions on robotic assistance systems from the perspective of healthcare workers. We find that healthcare workers are generally optimistic about the implementation of technology in their workplace and not all have pressing concerns. Paradoxically, we further find that reasoning for why a robot could be part of a team are similar among participants who are opposed to robots in teams and those who are in favour. While participants only focused on work- and task-related criteria when arguing why a robot could be a future colleague, they presented work-and task-unrelated criteria for why a robot could not be one. We discuss the expected impact of robotic assistance systems on work teams in healthcare and pose resulting questions to inspire future hypothetico-inferential research on human-robot teams. We conclude with arguing why current team definitions do not fit human-robot teams and propose a new theoretical model for teams that include humans and robots.
与机器人合作:分析医疗工作者的潜力和挑战,并定义团队合作
在与医疗工作者的访谈中,我们探讨了机器人辅助系统在医疗保健领域未来部署的潜力和挑战。我们关注个人的期望、愿望和恐惧。我们特别强调机器人系统在团队动力学中的潜在作用。机器人将来会成为我们的同事还是工具?除此之外,他们会改变团队内部的合作方式吗?遵循扎实的理论方法,我们的目标是从医疗工作者的角度产生机器人辅助系统的新理论和研究问题。我们发现,医疗工作者普遍对技术在其工作场所的实施持乐观态度,并不是所有人都有紧迫的担忧。矛盾的是,我们进一步发现,在反对和赞成机器人加入团队的参与者中,机器人加入团队的原因是相似的。虽然参与者在争论为什么机器人可以成为未来的同事时只关注与工作和任务相关的标准,但他们提出了与工作和任务无关的标准来说明为什么机器人不能成为未来的同事。我们讨论了机器人辅助系统对医疗保健工作团队的预期影响,并提出了由此产生的问题,以启发未来对人-机器人团队的假设推理研究。最后,我们讨论了为什么当前的团队定义不适合人-机器人团队,并为包括人和机器人的团队提出了一个新的理论模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信