A multinational assessment of AI literacy among university students in Germany, the UK, and the US

Marie Hornberger , Arne Bewersdorff , Daniel S. Schiff , Claudia Nerdel
{"title":"A multinational assessment of AI literacy among university students in Germany, the UK, and the US","authors":"Marie Hornberger ,&nbsp;Arne Bewersdorff ,&nbsp;Daniel S. Schiff ,&nbsp;Claudia Nerdel","doi":"10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>AI literacy is one of the key competencies that university students – future professionals and citizens – need for their lives and careers in an AI-dominated world. Cross-national research on AI literacy can generate critical insights into trends and gaps needed to improve AI education. In this study, we focus on Germany, the UK, and the US given their leadership in AI adoption, innovation, and proactive engagement in AI policy and education. We assessed the AI literacy of 1,465 students across these three countries using a knowledge test previously validated in Germany. We additionally measure AI self-efficacy, interest in AI, attitudes towards AI, AI use, and students' prior learning experiences. Our analysis based on item response theory demonstrates that the AI literacy test remains effective in measuring AI literacy across different languages and countries. Our findings indicate that the majority of students have a foundational level of AI literacy, as well as relatively high levels of interest and positive attitudes related to AI. Students in Germany tend to have a higher level of AI literacy compared to their peers in the UK and US, whereas students in the UK tend to have more negative attitudes towards AI, and US students have higher AI self-efficacy. Based on these results, we offer recommendations for educators on how to take into account differences in characteristics of students such as attitudes towards AI and prior experiences to create effective learning opportunities. By validating an existing AI literacy test instrument across different countries and languages, we provide an instrument and data which can orient future research and AI literacy assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100324,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882125000167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AI literacy is one of the key competencies that university students – future professionals and citizens – need for their lives and careers in an AI-dominated world. Cross-national research on AI literacy can generate critical insights into trends and gaps needed to improve AI education. In this study, we focus on Germany, the UK, and the US given their leadership in AI adoption, innovation, and proactive engagement in AI policy and education. We assessed the AI literacy of 1,465 students across these three countries using a knowledge test previously validated in Germany. We additionally measure AI self-efficacy, interest in AI, attitudes towards AI, AI use, and students' prior learning experiences. Our analysis based on item response theory demonstrates that the AI literacy test remains effective in measuring AI literacy across different languages and countries. Our findings indicate that the majority of students have a foundational level of AI literacy, as well as relatively high levels of interest and positive attitudes related to AI. Students in Germany tend to have a higher level of AI literacy compared to their peers in the UK and US, whereas students in the UK tend to have more negative attitudes towards AI, and US students have higher AI self-efficacy. Based on these results, we offer recommendations for educators on how to take into account differences in characteristics of students such as attitudes towards AI and prior experiences to create effective learning opportunities. By validating an existing AI literacy test instrument across different countries and languages, we provide an instrument and data which can orient future research and AI literacy assessment.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信