A multinational assessment of AI literacy among university students in Germany, the UK, and the US

Marie Hornberger , Arne Bewersdorff , Daniel S. Schiff , Claudia Nerdel
{"title":"A multinational assessment of AI literacy among university students in Germany, the UK, and the US","authors":"Marie Hornberger ,&nbsp;Arne Bewersdorff ,&nbsp;Daniel S. Schiff ,&nbsp;Claudia Nerdel","doi":"10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>AI literacy is one of the key competencies that university students – future professionals and citizens – need for their lives and careers in an AI-dominated world. Cross-national research on AI literacy can generate critical insights into trends and gaps needed to improve AI education. In this study, we focus on Germany, the UK, and the US given their leadership in AI adoption, innovation, and proactive engagement in AI policy and education. We assessed the AI literacy of 1,465 students across these three countries using a knowledge test previously validated in Germany. We additionally measure AI self-efficacy, interest in AI, attitudes towards AI, AI use, and students' prior learning experiences. Our analysis based on item response theory demonstrates that the AI literacy test remains effective in measuring AI literacy across different languages and countries. Our findings indicate that the majority of students have a foundational level of AI literacy, as well as relatively high levels of interest and positive attitudes related to AI. Students in Germany tend to have a higher level of AI literacy compared to their peers in the UK and US, whereas students in the UK tend to have more negative attitudes towards AI, and US students have higher AI self-efficacy. Based on these results, we offer recommendations for educators on how to take into account differences in characteristics of students such as attitudes towards AI and prior experiences to create effective learning opportunities. By validating an existing AI literacy test instrument across different countries and languages, we provide an instrument and data which can orient future research and AI literacy assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100324,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882125000167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AI literacy is one of the key competencies that university students – future professionals and citizens – need for their lives and careers in an AI-dominated world. Cross-national research on AI literacy can generate critical insights into trends and gaps needed to improve AI education. In this study, we focus on Germany, the UK, and the US given their leadership in AI adoption, innovation, and proactive engagement in AI policy and education. We assessed the AI literacy of 1,465 students across these three countries using a knowledge test previously validated in Germany. We additionally measure AI self-efficacy, interest in AI, attitudes towards AI, AI use, and students' prior learning experiences. Our analysis based on item response theory demonstrates that the AI literacy test remains effective in measuring AI literacy across different languages and countries. Our findings indicate that the majority of students have a foundational level of AI literacy, as well as relatively high levels of interest and positive attitudes related to AI. Students in Germany tend to have a higher level of AI literacy compared to their peers in the UK and US, whereas students in the UK tend to have more negative attitudes towards AI, and US students have higher AI self-efficacy. Based on these results, we offer recommendations for educators on how to take into account differences in characteristics of students such as attitudes towards AI and prior experiences to create effective learning opportunities. By validating an existing AI literacy test instrument across different countries and languages, we provide an instrument and data which can orient future research and AI literacy assessment.
对德国、英国和美国大学生的人工智能素养进行跨国评估
人工智能素养是大学生——未来的专业人士和公民——在人工智能主导的世界中生活和事业所需的关键能力之一。关于人工智能素养的跨国研究可以对改善人工智能教育所需的趋势和差距产生重要见解。在本研究中,我们重点关注德国、英国和美国,因为它们在人工智能采用、创新和积极参与人工智能政策和教育方面处于领先地位。我们使用之前在德国验证的知识测试,评估了这三个国家1465名学生的人工智能素养。我们还测量了人工智能的自我效能、对人工智能的兴趣、对人工智能的态度、人工智能的使用以及学生之前的学习经历。我们基于项目反应理论的分析表明,人工智能素养测试在衡量不同语言和国家的人工智能素养方面仍然有效。我们的研究结果表明,大多数学生对人工智能有基本的认识,对人工智能也有相对较高的兴趣和积极的态度。与英国和美国的学生相比,德国学生对人工智能的认知水平更高,而英国学生对人工智能的态度更消极,美国学生对人工智能的自我效能感更高。基于这些结果,我们为教育工作者提供了如何考虑学生特征差异的建议,例如对人工智能的态度和之前的经验,以创造有效的学习机会。通过在不同国家和语言中验证现有的人工智能读写能力测试工具,我们提供了一个工具和数据,可以指导未来的研究和人工智能读写能力评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信