Phylogenomics of marine angelfishes: diagnosing sources of systematic discordance for an iconic reef fish family (F: Pomacanthidae)

IF 6.1 1区 生物学 Q1 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Lauriane M Baraf, Julia Y Hung, Peter F Cowman
{"title":"Phylogenomics of marine angelfishes: diagnosing sources of systematic discordance for an iconic reef fish family (F: Pomacanthidae)","authors":"Lauriane M Baraf, Julia Y Hung, Peter F Cowman","doi":"10.1093/sysbio/syaf016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Genome-scale datasets are resolving challenging nodes across the tree of life. These datasets however, characterized by inherent heterogeneity, often push traditional phylogenetic reconstruction methods to their limits. By integrating multiple phylogenomic approaches, we can identify the causes of topological discordance within genomic partitions while accounting for various sources of heterogeneity and systematic errors. Here we conduct the first in-depth analysis of discordance for the reef family Pomacanthidae (marine angelfishes) using target enrichment data of ~1,000 ultraconserved elements from 45 pomacanthid species. Our combined phylogenomic approach resolved the systematics of the family at the base of the pomacanthid tree. Despite this resolution, our analyses also highlight discordance in ancestral nodes associated with the paraphyletic Centropyge genus and monotypic Pygoplites lineage, and the impact of incomplete lineage sorting in the evolutionary history pomacanthids. Species network searches and model selection supported a reticulated evolutionary history suggesting three ancient gene flow events between ghost (or unsampled) lineages at the root of the Pomacanthidae tree and ancestors of Genicanthus, Centropyge, Chaetodontoplus and Pomacanthus lineages. This study advances our understanding of diagnosing topological discordance in genome-scale phylogenies and provide an analytical pathway for limiting systematic errors. In the process of diagnosing discordance, we identify key evolutionary processes involved in the complex evolution of marine angelfishes. While often inconvenient in phylogenetic analyses, patterns of discordance can shed light on underlying biological and evolutionary processes that shape the evolution of biodiversity.","PeriodicalId":22120,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Biology","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syaf016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Genome-scale datasets are resolving challenging nodes across the tree of life. These datasets however, characterized by inherent heterogeneity, often push traditional phylogenetic reconstruction methods to their limits. By integrating multiple phylogenomic approaches, we can identify the causes of topological discordance within genomic partitions while accounting for various sources of heterogeneity and systematic errors. Here we conduct the first in-depth analysis of discordance for the reef family Pomacanthidae (marine angelfishes) using target enrichment data of ~1,000 ultraconserved elements from 45 pomacanthid species. Our combined phylogenomic approach resolved the systematics of the family at the base of the pomacanthid tree. Despite this resolution, our analyses also highlight discordance in ancestral nodes associated with the paraphyletic Centropyge genus and monotypic Pygoplites lineage, and the impact of incomplete lineage sorting in the evolutionary history pomacanthids. Species network searches and model selection supported a reticulated evolutionary history suggesting three ancient gene flow events between ghost (or unsampled) lineages at the root of the Pomacanthidae tree and ancestors of Genicanthus, Centropyge, Chaetodontoplus and Pomacanthus lineages. This study advances our understanding of diagnosing topological discordance in genome-scale phylogenies and provide an analytical pathway for limiting systematic errors. In the process of diagnosing discordance, we identify key evolutionary processes involved in the complex evolution of marine angelfishes. While often inconvenient in phylogenetic analyses, patterns of discordance can shed light on underlying biological and evolutionary processes that shape the evolution of biodiversity.
海洋天使鱼的系统基因组学:一个标志性珊瑚鱼科(F: Pomacanthidae)系统不一致性的诊断来源
基因组规模的数据集正在解决生命之树上具有挑战性的节点。然而,这些数据集具有固有的异质性,往往将传统的系统发育重建方法推向极限。通过整合多种系统基因组学方法,我们可以确定基因组分区内拓扑不一致的原因,同时考虑各种异质性和系统误差的来源。本文首次对礁科Pomacanthidae(海洋天使鱼)的不一致性进行了深入分析,利用了来自45种Pomacanthidae物种的约1000个超保守元素的目标富集数据。我们的联合系统基因组学方法解决了在pomacanthic树的基础上的家庭的系统分类。尽管如此,我们的分析也强调了与单型Pygoplites谱系相关的祖先节点的不一致性,以及不完整的谱系分选对pomacanthids进化史的影响。物种网络搜索和模式选择支持了一个网状的进化历史,表明在pomacanidae树根的鬼(或未采样)谱系和Genicanthus、Centropyge、Chaetodontoplus和Pomacanthus谱系的祖先之间发生了三个古老的基因流动事件。本研究提高了我们对基因组级系统发育中拓扑不一致诊断的理解,并为限制系统错误提供了分析途径。在诊断不一致的过程中,我们确定了参与海洋天使鱼复杂进化的关键进化过程。虽然在系统发育分析中常常不方便,但不一致的模式可以揭示影响生物多样性进化的潜在生物和进化过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Biology
Systematic Biology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
70
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Biology is the bimonthly journal of the Society of Systematic Biologists. Papers for the journal are original contributions to the theory, principles, and methods of systematics as well as phylogeny, evolution, morphology, biogeography, paleontology, genetics, and the classification of all living things. A Points of View section offers a forum for discussion, while book reviews and announcements of general interest are also featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信