Utilization of an Electronic Health Record Embedded Enterprise Health Data Exchange: A Single Institute Experience.

Joshua Volin, Vidya Viswanathan, Peter Harri, Colin Segovis, Nabile Safdar, Elias Kikano
{"title":"Utilization of an Electronic Health Record Embedded Enterprise Health Data Exchange: A Single Institute Experience.","authors":"Joshua Volin, Vidya Viswanathan, Peter Harri, Colin Segovis, Nabile Safdar, Elias Kikano","doi":"10.1007/s10278-025-01459-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evaluate the demand, volume, and institutional utilization of an EHR-based platform for health data exchange in a single US academic system. A retrospective review (3/2023-4/2024) spanned 11 hospitals and over 500 outpatient sites. Analytic reports from the Epic Care Everywhere Image Exchange Advanced Platform (Verona, WI) captured inbound (requested internally) and outbound (accessed externally) data volumes, including thumbnails and subsequent reference-quality key image retrievals. Data types were categorized as DICOM or non-DICOM (e.g., JPG, PDF). Counts, retrieval rates, and geographic patterns were analyzed. Inbound data involved 1.6 million patients from 370 external organizations, generating 5% for DICOM and 3% for non-DICOM; 77% of inbound thumbnails originated in-state. From 3/2023 to 4/2024, 1.9 million outbound thumbnails were accessed by 1478 external institutions, with a 78% reference-quality key image retrieval rate. Most outbound thumbnails were non-DICOM (66%); however, overall DICOM retrieval rates (5%) were higher than non-DICOM (3%). In-state institutions retrieved the most thumbnails (1,156,896/59%), whereas out-of-state sites requested more reference-quality key images (1,034,614/67%). Top users included various private and public health sectors. Findings show a growing reliance on EHR-embedded health data exchange. The abundance of inbound non-DICOM underscores interoperability challenges, while high DICOM retrieval rates emphasize clinical importance. Geographic disparities highlight the need for standardized solutions to improve continuity of care. Moreover, the upcoming HTI-2 bill mandates stronger data exchange measures, reinforcing the urgency for scalability. Health data exchange is in high demand as patients increasingly seek care across the US.</p>","PeriodicalId":516858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-025-01459-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluate the demand, volume, and institutional utilization of an EHR-based platform for health data exchange in a single US academic system. A retrospective review (3/2023-4/2024) spanned 11 hospitals and over 500 outpatient sites. Analytic reports from the Epic Care Everywhere Image Exchange Advanced Platform (Verona, WI) captured inbound (requested internally) and outbound (accessed externally) data volumes, including thumbnails and subsequent reference-quality key image retrievals. Data types were categorized as DICOM or non-DICOM (e.g., JPG, PDF). Counts, retrieval rates, and geographic patterns were analyzed. Inbound data involved 1.6 million patients from 370 external organizations, generating 5% for DICOM and 3% for non-DICOM; 77% of inbound thumbnails originated in-state. From 3/2023 to 4/2024, 1.9 million outbound thumbnails were accessed by 1478 external institutions, with a 78% reference-quality key image retrieval rate. Most outbound thumbnails were non-DICOM (66%); however, overall DICOM retrieval rates (5%) were higher than non-DICOM (3%). In-state institutions retrieved the most thumbnails (1,156,896/59%), whereas out-of-state sites requested more reference-quality key images (1,034,614/67%). Top users included various private and public health sectors. Findings show a growing reliance on EHR-embedded health data exchange. The abundance of inbound non-DICOM underscores interoperability challenges, while high DICOM retrieval rates emphasize clinical importance. Geographic disparities highlight the need for standardized solutions to improve continuity of care. Moreover, the upcoming HTI-2 bill mandates stronger data exchange measures, reinforcing the urgency for scalability. Health data exchange is in high demand as patients increasingly seek care across the US.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信