Utilization of an Electronic Health Record Embedded Enterprise Health Data Exchange: A Single Institute Experience.

Joshua Volin, Vidya Viswanathan, Peter Harri, Colin Segovis, Nabile Safdar, Elias Kikano
{"title":"Utilization of an Electronic Health Record Embedded Enterprise Health Data Exchange: A Single Institute Experience.","authors":"Joshua Volin, Vidya Viswanathan, Peter Harri, Colin Segovis, Nabile Safdar, Elias Kikano","doi":"10.1007/s10278-025-01459-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evaluate the demand, volume, and institutional utilization of an EHR-based platform for health data exchange in a single US academic system. A retrospective review (3/2023-4/2024) spanned 11 hospitals and over 500 outpatient sites. Analytic reports from the Epic Care Everywhere Image Exchange Advanced Platform (Verona, WI) captured inbound (requested internally) and outbound (accessed externally) data volumes, including thumbnails and subsequent reference-quality key image retrievals. Data types were categorized as DICOM or non-DICOM (e.g., JPG, PDF). Counts, retrieval rates, and geographic patterns were analyzed. Inbound data involved 1.6 million patients from 370 external organizations, generating 5% for DICOM and 3% for non-DICOM; 77% of inbound thumbnails originated in-state. From 3/2023 to 4/2024, 1.9 million outbound thumbnails were accessed by 1478 external institutions, with a 78% reference-quality key image retrieval rate. Most outbound thumbnails were non-DICOM (66%); however, overall DICOM retrieval rates (5%) were higher than non-DICOM (3%). In-state institutions retrieved the most thumbnails (1,156,896/59%), whereas out-of-state sites requested more reference-quality key images (1,034,614/67%). Top users included various private and public health sectors. Findings show a growing reliance on EHR-embedded health data exchange. The abundance of inbound non-DICOM underscores interoperability challenges, while high DICOM retrieval rates emphasize clinical importance. Geographic disparities highlight the need for standardized solutions to improve continuity of care. Moreover, the upcoming HTI-2 bill mandates stronger data exchange measures, reinforcing the urgency for scalability. Health data exchange is in high demand as patients increasingly seek care across the US.</p>","PeriodicalId":516858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-025-01459-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluate the demand, volume, and institutional utilization of an EHR-based platform for health data exchange in a single US academic system. A retrospective review (3/2023-4/2024) spanned 11 hospitals and over 500 outpatient sites. Analytic reports from the Epic Care Everywhere Image Exchange Advanced Platform (Verona, WI) captured inbound (requested internally) and outbound (accessed externally) data volumes, including thumbnails and subsequent reference-quality key image retrievals. Data types were categorized as DICOM or non-DICOM (e.g., JPG, PDF). Counts, retrieval rates, and geographic patterns were analyzed. Inbound data involved 1.6 million patients from 370 external organizations, generating 5% for DICOM and 3% for non-DICOM; 77% of inbound thumbnails originated in-state. From 3/2023 to 4/2024, 1.9 million outbound thumbnails were accessed by 1478 external institutions, with a 78% reference-quality key image retrieval rate. Most outbound thumbnails were non-DICOM (66%); however, overall DICOM retrieval rates (5%) were higher than non-DICOM (3%). In-state institutions retrieved the most thumbnails (1,156,896/59%), whereas out-of-state sites requested more reference-quality key images (1,034,614/67%). Top users included various private and public health sectors. Findings show a growing reliance on EHR-embedded health data exchange. The abundance of inbound non-DICOM underscores interoperability challenges, while high DICOM retrieval rates emphasize clinical importance. Geographic disparities highlight the need for standardized solutions to improve continuity of care. Moreover, the upcoming HTI-2 bill mandates stronger data exchange measures, reinforcing the urgency for scalability. Health data exchange is in high demand as patients increasingly seek care across the US.

电子健康记录嵌入式企业健康数据交换的利用:单个研究所的经验。
评估美国单一学术系统中基于ehr的健康数据交换平台的需求、数量和机构利用率。一项回顾性审查(2023年3月至2024年4月)涵盖了11家医院和500多个门诊点。来自Epic Care Everywhere图像交换高级平台(维罗纳,WI)的分析报告捕获了入站(内部请求)和出站(外部访问)数据量,包括thumbnails和随后的参考质量关键图像检索。数据类型分为DICOM或非DICOM(例如,JPG, PDF)。分析了计数、检索率和地理模式。入站数据涉及来自370个外部组织的160万名患者,其中5%为DICOM, 3%为非DICOM;77%的入站缩略图来自本州。2023年3月至2024年4月,1478家外部机构共获取外传缩略图190万张,检索率78%。大多数出站缩略图为非dicom (66%);然而,总体DICOM检索率(5%)高于非DICOM检索率(3%)。州内机构检索的缩略图最多(1,156,896/59%),而州外网站要求更多参考质量的关键图像(1,034,614/67%)。主要用户包括各种私营和公共卫生部门。调查结果显示,越来越依赖嵌入电子病历的卫生数据交换。大量的入境非DICOM强调了互操作性的挑战,而高DICOM检索率强调了临床重要性。地域差异突出表明需要标准化解决办法,以改善护理的连续性。此外,即将出台的HTI-2法案要求更强的数据交换措施,从而加强了可扩展性的紧迫性。随着美国各地越来越多的患者寻求治疗,健康数据交换的需求很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信