Interdisciplinary Management of Cardiotoxicity in Outpatient Settings: A Survey on Practices, Perceptions and Potential for Improvement.

European cardiology Pub Date : 2025-02-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.15420/ecr.2023.49
Silvio Quick, Lorena Payo-Anez, Clara Marx Casimiro de Almeida, Jochen Schmitt, Karim Ibrahim, Markus Kösters, Marian Christoph, Tina Haase, Lorenz Harst
{"title":"Interdisciplinary Management of Cardiotoxicity in Outpatient Settings: A Survey on Practices, Perceptions and Potential for Improvement.","authors":"Silvio Quick, Lorena Payo-Anez, Clara Marx Casimiro de Almeida, Jochen Schmitt, Karim Ibrahim, Markus Kösters, Marian Christoph, Tina Haase, Lorenz Harst","doi":"10.15420/ecr.2023.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiotoxicity is a major concern in patients undergoing chemotherapy, requiring interdisciplinary management. However, the extent to which cardiotoxicity is managed in the outpatient setting among these specialists may vary, potentially leading to gaps in patient care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This questionnaire study assessed the current practices and perceptions of cardiologists, oncologists and gynaecologists regarding the management of cardiotoxicity in patients undergoing outpatient chemotherapy in Germany.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,329 medical professionals were contacted via an online questionnaire; 132 (9.9%) were included in the survey. The participants in our survey reported treating a total of 1,905 chemotherapy patients per month (range 1-200). Of these patients, only 37% of those treated by oncologists (n=13) and 48% of those treated by gynaecologists (n=53) received cardiological care. The results showed that 37% (49/132) of the healthcare professionals surveyed said they performed cardiovascular toxicity risk assessment of chemotherapy in their clinical practice. More than half of the participants (56%, 39/70) expressed a need for simplified cardio-oncology guidelines. The majority of participants (84% [59/70] and 83% [58/70], respectively) requested tools to assist in cardiovascular toxicity risk assessment and the implementation of appropriate therapeutic measures for patients undergoing chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study underscores potential interdisciplinary care gaps, possibly increasing the risk of undetected cardiotoxicity. Variations in cardiotoxicity management among specialities highlight the need for increased awareness and improved collaboration. Interdisciplinary clinical pathways could address these issues, as could a dedicated cardio-oncology network for primary care physicians' support.</p>","PeriodicalId":93994,"journal":{"name":"European cardiology","volume":"20 ","pages":"e02"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11865667/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/ecr.2023.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiotoxicity is a major concern in patients undergoing chemotherapy, requiring interdisciplinary management. However, the extent to which cardiotoxicity is managed in the outpatient setting among these specialists may vary, potentially leading to gaps in patient care.

Methods: This questionnaire study assessed the current practices and perceptions of cardiologists, oncologists and gynaecologists regarding the management of cardiotoxicity in patients undergoing outpatient chemotherapy in Germany.

Results: A total of 1,329 medical professionals were contacted via an online questionnaire; 132 (9.9%) were included in the survey. The participants in our survey reported treating a total of 1,905 chemotherapy patients per month (range 1-200). Of these patients, only 37% of those treated by oncologists (n=13) and 48% of those treated by gynaecologists (n=53) received cardiological care. The results showed that 37% (49/132) of the healthcare professionals surveyed said they performed cardiovascular toxicity risk assessment of chemotherapy in their clinical practice. More than half of the participants (56%, 39/70) expressed a need for simplified cardio-oncology guidelines. The majority of participants (84% [59/70] and 83% [58/70], respectively) requested tools to assist in cardiovascular toxicity risk assessment and the implementation of appropriate therapeutic measures for patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Conclusion: Our study underscores potential interdisciplinary care gaps, possibly increasing the risk of undetected cardiotoxicity. Variations in cardiotoxicity management among specialities highlight the need for increased awareness and improved collaboration. Interdisciplinary clinical pathways could address these issues, as could a dedicated cardio-oncology network for primary care physicians' support.

门诊心脏毒性的跨学科管理:实践、认知和改进潜力的调查。
背景:心脏毒性是化疗患者关注的主要问题,需要跨学科管理。然而,这些专家在门诊环境中处理心脏毒性的程度可能各不相同,这可能导致患者护理方面的差距。方法:本问卷研究评估了目前在德国接受门诊化疗患者的心脏毒性管理方面,心脏病专家、肿瘤学家和妇科医生的做法和看法。结果:通过在线问卷共联系了1329名医疗专业人员;132家(9.9%)被纳入调查。我们调查的参与者报告每月共治疗1905名化疗患者(范围1-200)。在这些患者中,只有37%的肿瘤科医生(n=13)和48%的妇科医生(n=53)接受了心脏病治疗。结果显示,37%(49/132)的受访医护人员表示,他们在临床实践中进行了化疗的心血管毒性风险评估。超过一半的参与者(56%,39/70)表示需要简化心脏肿瘤学指南。大多数参与者(分别为84%[59/70]和83%[58/70])要求工具协助进行心血管毒性风险评估,并为接受化疗的患者实施适当的治疗措施。结论:我们的研究强调了潜在的跨学科护理差距,可能会增加未被发现的心脏毒性的风险。各专业之间心脏毒性管理的差异突出了提高认识和改善合作的必要性。跨学科临床途径可以解决这些问题,为初级保健医生提供支持的专门的心脏肿瘤学网络也可以解决这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信