A Quality Improvement Project to Promote Interdisciplinary Communication Using the Pediatric Early Warning System.

IF 1.2 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric quality & safety Pub Date : 2025-03-03 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000800
Jan Fune, Angie Buttigieg, Srividya Bhadriraju, Rachel Moss, Laura N Hodo
{"title":"A Quality Improvement Project to Promote Interdisciplinary Communication Using the Pediatric Early Warning System.","authors":"Jan Fune, Angie Buttigieg, Srividya Bhadriraju, Rachel Moss, Laura N Hodo","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In August 2020, residents and nurses lacked awareness and knowledge of the pediatric early warning system (PEWS). Residents and nurses infrequently performed interdisciplinary bedside huddles for patients with critical scores, and residents did not document assessments and plans despite these patients being at higher risk for clinical deterioration. We aimed to increase the mean rate of documented huddles from 0% to 50% within 4 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We piloted this quality improvement project on 1 floor of a pediatric hospital and included patients admitted to the pediatric hospital medicine service. Key drivers included buy-in and trust in PEWS, understanding of critical scores, a reliable scoring algorithm, and a culture where interdisciplinary communication is routine. Interventions included physician and nurse education, improving the scoring algorithm, and promoting a shared understanding of PEWS. Our outcome measure was the percentage of documented huddle notes for each patient with a critical score, a proxy for huddles occurring. We entered data into a control chart and analyzed it for changes in response to interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean baseline rate of note completion was 0%. After 4 months, the mean increased to 100%, associated with multiple educational interventions and efforts to improve the scoring algorithm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing multimodal interventions was associated with an increased rate of documented huddles. Scoring algorithm changes and personalized education galvanized physician and nurse support for PEWS. Institutions can use the lessons we have learned to implement PEWS and promote huddles and interdisciplinary communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":74412,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric quality & safety","volume":"10 2","pages":"e800"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11875586/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric quality & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In August 2020, residents and nurses lacked awareness and knowledge of the pediatric early warning system (PEWS). Residents and nurses infrequently performed interdisciplinary bedside huddles for patients with critical scores, and residents did not document assessments and plans despite these patients being at higher risk for clinical deterioration. We aimed to increase the mean rate of documented huddles from 0% to 50% within 4 months.

Methods: We piloted this quality improvement project on 1 floor of a pediatric hospital and included patients admitted to the pediatric hospital medicine service. Key drivers included buy-in and trust in PEWS, understanding of critical scores, a reliable scoring algorithm, and a culture where interdisciplinary communication is routine. Interventions included physician and nurse education, improving the scoring algorithm, and promoting a shared understanding of PEWS. Our outcome measure was the percentage of documented huddle notes for each patient with a critical score, a proxy for huddles occurring. We entered data into a control chart and analyzed it for changes in response to interventions.

Results: The mean baseline rate of note completion was 0%. After 4 months, the mean increased to 100%, associated with multiple educational interventions and efforts to improve the scoring algorithm.

Conclusions: Implementing multimodal interventions was associated with an increased rate of documented huddles. Scoring algorithm changes and personalized education galvanized physician and nurse support for PEWS. Institutions can use the lessons we have learned to implement PEWS and promote huddles and interdisciplinary communication.

利用儿科早期预警系统促进跨学科交流的质量改进项目。
2020年8月,住院医师和护士对儿科预警系统(PEWS)缺乏认识和了解。住院医师和护士很少对临界评分的患者进行跨学科的床边会议,尽管这些患者有更高的临床恶化风险,住院医师也没有记录评估和计划。我们的目标是在4个月内将记录在案的会议的平均比率从0%提高到50%。方法:在某儿科医院1层进行质量改进试点,纳入儿科医院内科服务的住院患者。关键驱动因素包括对PEWS的支持和信任,对关键分数的理解,可靠的评分算法,以及跨学科交流成为常规的文化。干预措施包括医生和护士教育,改进评分算法,促进对PEWS的共同理解。我们的结果测量是每个患者记录的会议记录的关键分数的百分比,这是会议发生的代理。我们将数据输入控制图,并对干预措施的反应变化进行分析。结果:平均基线记录完成率为0%。4个月后,由于多种教育干预和改进评分算法的努力,平均值增加到100%。结论:实施多模式干预与记录在案的病例增多有关。评分算法的改变和个性化教育激发了医生和护士对PEWS的支持。机构可以利用我们学到的经验教训来实施PEWS,促进会议和跨学科交流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信