“Nobody Can Be Equipped for This”: Advice From New Residents of Long-Term Care Facilities

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Kenneth Lam, James D. Harrison, Landon Haller, William J. Deardorff, Rebecca L. Sudore, Kenneth E. Covinsky, Dan D. Matlock, Daniel Dohan
{"title":"“Nobody Can Be Equipped for This”: Advice From New Residents of Long-Term Care Facilities","authors":"Kenneth Lam,&nbsp;James D. Harrison,&nbsp;Landon Haller,&nbsp;William J. Deardorff,&nbsp;Rebecca L. Sudore,&nbsp;Kenneth E. Covinsky,&nbsp;Dan D. Matlock,&nbsp;Daniel Dohan","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The transition into a long-term care facility (LTCF) is difficult for older adults, prompting calls for clinicians to help guide and plan. Yet we know little about how those with lived experience of moving into an LTCF would advise others.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted in-person semi-structured interviews with nursing home (NH) and assisted living (AL) residents within 6 months of moving into an urban non-profit continuing care retirement community in California between 2023 and 2024. Interviews were guided by theories of long-term care utilization and asked, “what advice would you give others considering an LTCF?” We thematically analyzed interviews using the constant comparative method.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We interviewed 8 NH and 6 AL residents. Mean participant age was 82 (range 73–90); 8 were female, 1 participant was Asian, 13 participants were White, and mean Montreal Cognitive Assessment was 19 (range 12–25). Residents talked about LTCF entry within a broader phase of life defined by dependence following sudden unexpected health crises. Advice reflected strategies for this phase of life and highlighted challenges outside of their control. Some residents advised <i>preparation</i> by visiting facilities and budgeting time and resources to plan but discovered care arrangements did not work out as promised; care was fragmented, and dependence caused them to re-evaluate what they wanted. Some advised <i>avoidance</i> as they disliked living in an LTCF but had little control over entry, leading to distrust of those making decisions for them. Others advised <i>acceptance</i> and believed luck or fate dictated how everything worked out in the end.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Unanticipated health crises catalyze entry into LTCFs. New residents advised others to prepare for, avoid, or accept LTCF entry, reflecting different strategies for approaching a unique phase of life and highlighting systemic problems that could be improved. Anticipatory guidance for LTCF transitions should acknowledge their sudden nature, these strategies, and the need for system reform.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"73 5","pages":"1506-1516"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19405","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The transition into a long-term care facility (LTCF) is difficult for older adults, prompting calls for clinicians to help guide and plan. Yet we know little about how those with lived experience of moving into an LTCF would advise others.

Methods

We conducted in-person semi-structured interviews with nursing home (NH) and assisted living (AL) residents within 6 months of moving into an urban non-profit continuing care retirement community in California between 2023 and 2024. Interviews were guided by theories of long-term care utilization and asked, “what advice would you give others considering an LTCF?” We thematically analyzed interviews using the constant comparative method.

Results

We interviewed 8 NH and 6 AL residents. Mean participant age was 82 (range 73–90); 8 were female, 1 participant was Asian, 13 participants were White, and mean Montreal Cognitive Assessment was 19 (range 12–25). Residents talked about LTCF entry within a broader phase of life defined by dependence following sudden unexpected health crises. Advice reflected strategies for this phase of life and highlighted challenges outside of their control. Some residents advised preparation by visiting facilities and budgeting time and resources to plan but discovered care arrangements did not work out as promised; care was fragmented, and dependence caused them to re-evaluate what they wanted. Some advised avoidance as they disliked living in an LTCF but had little control over entry, leading to distrust of those making decisions for them. Others advised acceptance and believed luck or fate dictated how everything worked out in the end.

Conclusions

Unanticipated health crises catalyze entry into LTCFs. New residents advised others to prepare for, avoid, or accept LTCF entry, reflecting different strategies for approaching a unique phase of life and highlighting systemic problems that could be improved. Anticipatory guidance for LTCF transitions should acknowledge their sudden nature, these strategies, and the need for system reform.

“没人能做到这一点”:来自长期护理机构新居民的建议。
背景:老年人很难过渡到长期护理机构(LTCF),这促使临床医生帮助指导和计划。然而,对于那些有过进入长期基金生活经历的人会如何建议其他人,我们知之甚少。方法:我们对2023年至2024年间迁入加州城市非营利性持续护理退休社区的6个月内的养老院(NH)和辅助生活(AL)居民进行了面对面的半结构化访谈。访谈以长期护理利用理论为指导,并被问到:“你会给其他考虑长期护理的人什么建议?”我们使用恒定比较法对访谈进行主题分析。结果:我们访问了8名NH和6名AL居民。参与者平均年龄为82岁(73-90岁);8名女性,1名亚洲人,13名白人,蒙特利尔认知评估平均为19(范围12-25)。居民们谈到,长期生活基金进入了一个更广泛的生命阶段,这个阶段是由突如其来的意外健康危机后的依赖所定义的。建议反映了这一阶段的生活策略,并强调了他们无法控制的挑战。一些居民建议提前准备,参观设施,预算时间和资源来计划,但发现护理安排没有如承诺的那样有效;照顾是支离破碎的,依赖使他们重新评估自己想要什么。有些人建议回避,因为他们不喜欢生活在长期基金中,但又没有多少进入的控制权,这导致他们不信任那些为他们做决定的人。其他人则建议接受现实,并相信运气或命运决定了一切最终的结果。结论:意想不到的健康危机促进了进入ltcf。新居民建议其他人准备、避免或接受LTCF的进入,反映了接近生命独特阶段的不同策略,并突出了可以改善的系统性问题。对长期基金转型的前瞻性指导应承认其突发性、这些策略以及系统改革的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
504
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信