Characteristics and Causes of Stillbirths Following Disruption to Antenatal Care During Implementation of COVID-19 Mitigation Measures.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Jasmine Donaghey, Sandy Chu, Shivadharshini Sridhar, Atul Malhotra, Kirsten R Palmer, Daniel L Rolnik, Ben W Mol
{"title":"Characteristics and Causes of Stillbirths Following Disruption to Antenatal Care During Implementation of COVID-19 Mitigation Measures.","authors":"Jasmine Donaghey, Sandy Chu, Shivadharshini Sridhar, Atul Malhotra, Kirsten R Palmer, Daniel L Rolnik, Ben W Mol","doi":"10.1111/ajo.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Restrictions to mitigate COVID-19 transmission during the pandemic led to the disruption of routine antenatal care. We aimed to assess if those disruptions impacted the rates and types of stillbirths that occurred during that time.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study of the types and causes of stillbirths occurring in women attending three maternity hospitals in Melbourne, Australia, to understand if COVID-19 mitigation measures altered them. Stillborn babies conceived between November 2019 and February 2020 (restriction exposed cohort) were compared with stillborn babies conceived between November 2017 and February 2018 or November 2018 and February 2019 (control cohort). Stillbirths were classified according to the Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand classification system (2018).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the exposed cohort, 29/2511 foetuses were stillborn (11.55 per 1000 births), compared to 53/5171 (10.25 per 1000 births) in the non-exposed cohort. No statistical difference in rates of stillbirth was found between the two groups (odds ratio [OR] 1.13, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.78, p = 0.603). The rate of pregnancy terminations was significantly lower in the exposed cohort (7.1% vs. 34.0%, p = 0.007), while the antepartum stillbirth rate was significantly higher (82.8% vs. 49.1%, p = 0.003), particularly for unexplained stillbirths (51.7% vs. 17.0%, p < 0.001). The rate of congenital abnormalities was lower in the exposed cohort (24.1% vs. 45.3%, p = 0.059), however, not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Changes in routine antenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic may have resulted in a decreased diagnosis of congenital abnormalities, subsequent decreased terminations of pregnancy and a significant increase in unexplained antepartum foetal deaths.</p>","PeriodicalId":55429,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.70008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Restrictions to mitigate COVID-19 transmission during the pandemic led to the disruption of routine antenatal care. We aimed to assess if those disruptions impacted the rates and types of stillbirths that occurred during that time.

Material and methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of the types and causes of stillbirths occurring in women attending three maternity hospitals in Melbourne, Australia, to understand if COVID-19 mitigation measures altered them. Stillborn babies conceived between November 2019 and February 2020 (restriction exposed cohort) were compared with stillborn babies conceived between November 2017 and February 2018 or November 2018 and February 2019 (control cohort). Stillbirths were classified according to the Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand classification system (2018).

Results: In the exposed cohort, 29/2511 foetuses were stillborn (11.55 per 1000 births), compared to 53/5171 (10.25 per 1000 births) in the non-exposed cohort. No statistical difference in rates of stillbirth was found between the two groups (odds ratio [OR] 1.13, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.78, p = 0.603). The rate of pregnancy terminations was significantly lower in the exposed cohort (7.1% vs. 34.0%, p = 0.007), while the antepartum stillbirth rate was significantly higher (82.8% vs. 49.1%, p = 0.003), particularly for unexplained stillbirths (51.7% vs. 17.0%, p < 0.001). The rate of congenital abnormalities was lower in the exposed cohort (24.1% vs. 45.3%, p = 0.059), however, not significant.

Conclusions: Changes in routine antenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic may have resulted in a decreased diagnosis of congenital abnormalities, subsequent decreased terminations of pregnancy and a significant increase in unexplained antepartum foetal deaths.

实施 COVID-19 缓解措施期间产前护理中断后死胎的特征和原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
165
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ANZJOG) is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) and the RANZCOG Research foundation. ANZJOG aims to provide a medium for the publication of original contributions to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of obstetrics and gynaecology and related disciplines. Articles are peer reviewed by clinicians or researchers expert in the field of the submitted work. From time to time the journal will also publish printed abstracts from the RANZCOG Annual Scientific Meeting and meetings of relevant special interest groups, where the accepted abstracts have undergone the journals peer review acceptance process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信