Using machine learning to identify frequent attendance at accident and emergency services in Lanarkshire.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
DIGITAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-03-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20552076251315293
Fergus Reid, S Josephine Pravinkumar, Roma Maguire, Ashleigh Main, Haruno McCartney, Lewis Winters, Feng Dong
{"title":"Using machine learning to identify frequent attendance at accident and emergency services in Lanarkshire.","authors":"Fergus Reid, S Josephine Pravinkumar, Roma Maguire, Ashleigh Main, Haruno McCartney, Lewis Winters, Feng Dong","doi":"10.1177/20552076251315293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frequent attenders to accident and emergency (A&E) services pose complex challenges for healthcare providers, often driven by critical clinical needs. Machine learning (ML) offers potential for predictive approaches to managing frequent attendance, yet its application in this area is limited. Existing studies often focus on specific populations or models, raising concerns about generalisability. Identifying risk factors for frequent attendance and high resource use is crucial for effective prevention strategies.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This research aims to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of ML approaches in predicting frequent A&E attendance in NHS Lanarkshire, Scotland, identify associated risk factors and compare findings with existing research to uncover commonalities and differences.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Health and social care data were collected from 17,437 A&E patients in NHS Lanarkshire (2021-2022), including clinical, social and demographic information. Five classification models were tested: multinomial logistic regression (LR), random forests (RF), support vector machine (SVM) classifier, k-nearest neighbours (k-NN) and multi-layer perceptron (MLP) classifier. Models were evaluated using a confusion matrix and metrics such as precision, recall, F1 and area under the curve. Shapley values were used to identify risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MLP achieved the highest F1 score (0.75), followed by k-NN, RF and SVM (0.72 each), and LR (0.70). Key health conditions and risk factors consistently predicted frequent attendance across models, with some variation highlighting dataset-specific characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study underscores the utility of combining ML models to enhance prediction accuracy and identify risk factors. Findings align with existing research but reveal unique insights specific to the dataset and methodology.</p>","PeriodicalId":51333,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL HEALTH","volume":"11 ","pages":"20552076251315293"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11873922/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251315293","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Frequent attenders to accident and emergency (A&E) services pose complex challenges for healthcare providers, often driven by critical clinical needs. Machine learning (ML) offers potential for predictive approaches to managing frequent attendance, yet its application in this area is limited. Existing studies often focus on specific populations or models, raising concerns about generalisability. Identifying risk factors for frequent attendance and high resource use is crucial for effective prevention strategies.

Objectives: This research aims to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of ML approaches in predicting frequent A&E attendance in NHS Lanarkshire, Scotland, identify associated risk factors and compare findings with existing research to uncover commonalities and differences.

Method: Health and social care data were collected from 17,437 A&E patients in NHS Lanarkshire (2021-2022), including clinical, social and demographic information. Five classification models were tested: multinomial logistic regression (LR), random forests (RF), support vector machine (SVM) classifier, k-nearest neighbours (k-NN) and multi-layer perceptron (MLP) classifier. Models were evaluated using a confusion matrix and metrics such as precision, recall, F1 and area under the curve. Shapley values were used to identify risk factors.

Results: MLP achieved the highest F1 score (0.75), followed by k-NN, RF and SVM (0.72 each), and LR (0.70). Key health conditions and risk factors consistently predicted frequent attendance across models, with some variation highlighting dataset-specific characteristics.

Conclusions: This study underscores the utility of combining ML models to enhance prediction accuracy and identify risk factors. Findings align with existing research but reveal unique insights specific to the dataset and methodology.

使用机器学习识别拉纳克郡事故和紧急服务的频繁出勤情况。
背景:频繁参加事故和紧急(A&E)服务对医疗保健提供者构成了复杂的挑战,往往由关键的临床需求驱动。机器学习(ML)为管理频繁出勤提供了预测方法的潜力,但它在这一领域的应用有限。现有的研究往往集中在特定的人群或模型上,这引起了人们对普遍性的担忧。确定频繁出勤和资源高使用率的风险因素对于有效预防战略至关重要。目的:本研究旨在评估机器学习方法在预测苏格兰拉纳克郡NHS急诊科频繁出勤率方面的优势和劣势,确定相关的风险因素,并将研究结果与现有研究进行比较,以揭示共性和差异。方法:收集拉纳克郡NHS 2021-2022年17437例急诊科患者的健康和社会保健数据,包括临床、社会和人口统计信息。测试了五种分类模型:多项逻辑回归(LR)、随机森林(RF)、支持向量机(SVM)分类器、k-近邻(k-NN)和多层感知器(MLP)分类器。使用混淆矩阵和精度、召回率、F1和曲线下面积等指标对模型进行评估。沙普利值用于识别危险因素。结果:MLP的F1得分最高(0.75),其次是k-NN、RF和SVM(各0.72),LR(0.70)。关键健康状况和风险因素一致地预测了各模型的出勤频率,其中一些差异突出了数据集的特定特征。结论:本研究强调了结合ML模型提高预测准确性和识别危险因素的效用。调查结果与现有研究一致,但揭示了特定于数据集和方法的独特见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
DIGITAL HEALTH
DIGITAL HEALTH Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
302
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信