Racial Disparities in the Use of Physical Restraints and Intramuscular Medications for Patients Awaiting Psychiatric Hospitalization in the Emergency Department.

IF 2.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Jin Hong Park, Samuel T Savitz, Nicholas Allen, Priya R Gopalan, Jeffrey P Staab, David C Fipps
{"title":"Racial Disparities in the Use of Physical Restraints and Intramuscular Medications for Patients Awaiting Psychiatric Hospitalization in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Jin Hong Park, Samuel T Savitz, Nicholas Allen, Priya R Gopalan, Jeffrey P Staab, David C Fipps","doi":"10.1016/j.jaclp.2025.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Racial disparities within health care practices have drawn increasing attention. In psychiatric emergencies, patients may exhibit severe agitation necessitating the application of physical restraints and administration of intramuscular medications to ensure patient and staff safety and reduce acute symptoms. While previous studies have explored racial disparities in these interventions within the general emergency department (ED) settings, there remains a paucity of data about their use specifically in patients awaiting psychiatric hospitalization in the ED.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated disparity in the application of physical restraints and administration of intramuscular medications to Black versus non-Black patients awaiting psychiatric hospitalization in the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective chart review of adults admitted to an acute inpatient psychiatric unit through an academic tertiary care center's ED over a 1-year timeframe. Sociodemographic data, including age, sex, marital status, race (classified as Black or non-Black), and insurance types were collected. Clinical variables including primary psychiatric diagnosis, current suicide attempt or self-injurious behaviors, history of suicide attempts, history of psychiatric hospitalizations, involuntary status, application of physical restraints, and administration of acute intramuscular medications were extracted. Data on time of presentation were collected. Two logistic regression models were constructed with physical restraints and intramuscular medications as the outcomes, race as the independent variable, and other variables as covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 525 patient encounters were included in the study (mean age = 34.4 ± 11.0) with a female-to-male ratio of 0.82 (236:289). Seventy-eight (14.9%) encounters involved a patient identified as Black. Physical restraints were used in 35 encounters (6.7%). Black race (odds ratio [OR] = 2.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-7.84; P = 0.04) was associated with an increased likelihood of receiving physical restraints after controlling for covariates including current self-injurious behaviors (OR = 4.15; 95% CI = 1.02-16.88; P = 0.047), involuntary status (OR = 15.16; 95% CI = 6.14-37.45; P < 0.001), and visit to the ED on the weekend (OR = 4.04; 95% CI = 1.61-10.11; P < 0.01). Black race was not associated with the administration of intramuscular medications after controlling for covariates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate a racial disparity in the application of physical restraints in patients awaiting psychiatric hospitalization in the ED. The odds that Black patients experienced physical restraints were three times higher than for non-Black patients, even after adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":52388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaclp.2025.02.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Racial disparities within health care practices have drawn increasing attention. In psychiatric emergencies, patients may exhibit severe agitation necessitating the application of physical restraints and administration of intramuscular medications to ensure patient and staff safety and reduce acute symptoms. While previous studies have explored racial disparities in these interventions within the general emergency department (ED) settings, there remains a paucity of data about their use specifically in patients awaiting psychiatric hospitalization in the ED.

Objective: We investigated disparity in the application of physical restraints and administration of intramuscular medications to Black versus non-Black patients awaiting psychiatric hospitalization in the ED.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of adults admitted to an acute inpatient psychiatric unit through an academic tertiary care center's ED over a 1-year timeframe. Sociodemographic data, including age, sex, marital status, race (classified as Black or non-Black), and insurance types were collected. Clinical variables including primary psychiatric diagnosis, current suicide attempt or self-injurious behaviors, history of suicide attempts, history of psychiatric hospitalizations, involuntary status, application of physical restraints, and administration of acute intramuscular medications were extracted. Data on time of presentation were collected. Two logistic regression models were constructed with physical restraints and intramuscular medications as the outcomes, race as the independent variable, and other variables as covariates.

Results: A total of 525 patient encounters were included in the study (mean age = 34.4 ± 11.0) with a female-to-male ratio of 0.82 (236:289). Seventy-eight (14.9%) encounters involved a patient identified as Black. Physical restraints were used in 35 encounters (6.7%). Black race (odds ratio [OR] = 2.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-7.84; P = 0.04) was associated with an increased likelihood of receiving physical restraints after controlling for covariates including current self-injurious behaviors (OR = 4.15; 95% CI = 1.02-16.88; P = 0.047), involuntary status (OR = 15.16; 95% CI = 6.14-37.45; P < 0.001), and visit to the ED on the weekend (OR = 4.04; 95% CI = 1.61-10.11; P < 0.01). Black race was not associated with the administration of intramuscular medications after controlling for covariates.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate a racial disparity in the application of physical restraints in patients awaiting psychiatric hospitalization in the ED. The odds that Black patients experienced physical restraints were three times higher than for non-Black patients, even after adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors.

急诊科对精神病住院候诊患者使用物理约束和肌肉注射药物的种族差异。
背景:医疗保健实践中的种族差异已引起越来越多的关注。在精神紧急情况下,患者可能表现出严重的躁动,需要施加身体约束和给予肌肉注射药物,以确保患者和工作人员的安全并减轻急性症状。虽然以前的研究已经探讨了在普通急诊科(ED)设置中这些干预措施的种族差异,但仍然缺乏关于在ED等待精神病住院的患者中具体使用这些干预措施的数据。目的:我们调查了ED等待精神病住院的黑人与非黑人患者在物理约束和肌肉注射药物应用方面的差异。我们通过一个学术三级护理中心ED在一年的时间框架内对急性住院精神科的成年人进行了回顾性的图表回顾。收集了社会人口统计数据,包括年龄、性别、婚姻状况、种族(黑人或非黑人)和保险类型。提取临床变量,包括原发性精神病诊断、当前自杀或自残行为、自杀未遂史、精神病住院史、非自愿状态、物理约束的应用和急性肌内药物的使用。收集了有关就诊时间的数据。以身体约束和肌肉注射药物为结果,种族为自变量,其他变量为协变量,构建了两个logistic回归模型。结果:共纳入525例患者(平均年龄=34.4±11.0),男女比例为0.82(236:289)。78例(14.9%)患者为黑人。35例(6.7%)使用身体约束。黑人种族(OR=2.84;95%可信区间= 1.03 - -7.84;p=0.04)在控制了包括当前自伤行为在内的协变量后,与接受身体约束的可能性增加相关(OR=4.15;95%可信区间= 1.02 - -16.88;p=0.047),非自愿状态(OR=15.16;95%可信区间= 6.14 - -37.45;结论:我们的研究结果表明,在急诊科等待精神病住院的患者中,身体约束的应用存在种族差异。即使在调整了社会人口统计学和临床因素后,黑人患者遭受身体约束的几率是非黑人患者的三倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
378
审稿时长
50 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信