Development and validation of the Persian Prosthesis Embodiment Scale for Lower Limb Amputees.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Alireza Khani, Robin Bekrater-Bodmann, Zahra Fattahi, Vahideh Moradi, Mehdi Rezaee, Taher Babaee
{"title":"Development and validation of the Persian Prosthesis Embodiment Scale for Lower Limb Amputees.","authors":"Alireza Khani, Robin Bekrater-Bodmann, Zahra Fattahi, Vahideh Moradi, Mehdi Rezaee, Taher Babaee","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2471012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the psychometric features of the Persian version of the recently introduced Prosthesis Embodiment Scale for Lower Limb Amputees (PEmbS-LLA), as well its revised form.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, the translation process for the PEmbS-LLA followed internationally recommended guidelines. Scale reliability was determined by assessing internal consistency and test-retest reliability (after two weeks) using Cronbach's alpha and Spearman's correlation coefficients, respectively. The validity was evaluated using the Persian Trinity Amputation and Prosthetic Experience Scales (TAPES). We compared our findings to that obtained in a German sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With a total of 126 persons with lower limb amputation participating in the study, the Persian PEmbS-LLA showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ≥0.79) and test-retest reliability (Spearman's Rho ≥0.83). There were small to moderate correlations between the Persian PEmbS-LLA and TAPES subscales. Factor analysis revealed only one component with eigenvalue larger than 1, explaining 69.72% of the variance and suggesting unidimensionality. The PEmbS-LLA total score in the Iranian sample was significantly lower than in the German sample (<i>p</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Persian PEmbS-LLA is a valid and reliable instrument. Interpretation of significant differences in prosthesis embodiment between the samples requires further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2471012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the psychometric features of the Persian version of the recently introduced Prosthesis Embodiment Scale for Lower Limb Amputees (PEmbS-LLA), as well its revised form.

Materials and methods: In this cross-sectional study, the translation process for the PEmbS-LLA followed internationally recommended guidelines. Scale reliability was determined by assessing internal consistency and test-retest reliability (after two weeks) using Cronbach's alpha and Spearman's correlation coefficients, respectively. The validity was evaluated using the Persian Trinity Amputation and Prosthetic Experience Scales (TAPES). We compared our findings to that obtained in a German sample.

Results: With a total of 126 persons with lower limb amputation participating in the study, the Persian PEmbS-LLA showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ≥0.79) and test-retest reliability (Spearman's Rho ≥0.83). There were small to moderate correlations between the Persian PEmbS-LLA and TAPES subscales. Factor analysis revealed only one component with eigenvalue larger than 1, explaining 69.72% of the variance and suggesting unidimensionality. The PEmbS-LLA total score in the Iranian sample was significantly lower than in the German sample (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: The Persian PEmbS-LLA is a valid and reliable instrument. Interpretation of significant differences in prosthesis embodiment between the samples requires further research.

目的:研究最近推出的波斯语版下肢截肢者假肢体现量表(PEmbS-LLA)及其修订版的心理测量特征:在这项横向研究中,PEmbS-LLA 的翻译过程遵循了国际推荐的指南。采用 Cronbach's alpha 和 Spearman's 相关系数评估内部一致性和测试-再测可靠性(两周后),从而确定量表的可靠性。有效性则使用波斯语三位一体截肢和假肢体验量表(TAPES)进行评估。我们将研究结果与德国样本进行了比较:结果:共有 126 名下肢截肢者参与了研究,波斯 PEmbS-LLA 显示出良好的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha ≥0.79)和测试-再测可靠性(Spearman's Rho ≥0.83)。波斯语 PEmbS-LLA 和 TAPES 分量表之间存在小到中等程度的相关性。因子分析显示,只有一个成分的特征值大于 1,解释了 69.72% 的方差,表明其具有单维性。伊朗样本的 PEmbS-LLA 总分明显低于德国样本(p 结论:伊朗样本的 PEmbS-LLA 总分明显低于德国样本:波斯语 PEmbS-LLA 是一种有效、可靠的工具。要解释不同样本在假肢安装方面的显著差异,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信