Sociodemographic and reproductive characteristics of pregnant women with unplanned pregnancy residing in the state of São Paulo, Brazil: a cross-sectional study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Negli Gallardo-Alvarado, João V Antunes Lopes, Jose Guilherme Cecatti, Miriam Camas-Castillo, Renato T Souza, Luis Bahamondes
{"title":"Sociodemographic and reproductive characteristics of pregnant women with unplanned pregnancy residing in the state of São Paulo, Brazil: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Negli Gallardo-Alvarado, João V Antunes Lopes, Jose Guilherme Cecatti, Miriam Camas-Castillo, Renato T Souza, Luis Bahamondes","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2025.2457082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of our study was to assess the associated factors of planned and unplanned pregnancies (UPs) among pregnant women in São Paulo, Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study from March 2023 to June 2024 and invited pregnant women aged 18 to 49 years. We used the Brazilian-validated version of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy to assess pregnancy intentions. We estimated absolute and relative frequencies of planned and UPs by sociodemographic and reproductive characteristics. Bivariate and multiple regression analysis were performed to evaluate the associated factors for UPs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 534 participants; 65.7% reported an UP. Black or Biracial vs White women (74% vs. 57%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), with 0 to 9 years vs. those with >9 of schooling (77% vs. 51%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and single vs married women (85% vs. 48%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were associated with UPs. Parous women or those reporting a younger age at their sexual debut were more commonly reported UPs. The associated factors to UPs were being Black or Biracial (Odds ratio [OR] 1.68, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.11;2.57), reporting fewer schooling years (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.01;2.54), not being married [(OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.53;3.84) for cohabiters and OR 5.23, 95% CI 2.93;9.74) for single] and reporting additional births (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.07;1.56).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Black or Biracial, with fewer years of schooling, not married, and parous women were at a higher risk of UPs. These women tend to face structural barriers to planning the size and timing of their families, requiring actions like increasing tertiary education access and guaranteeing universal modern contraceptive availability to leverage these disadvantages and fulfil their sexual and reproductive rights.</p>","PeriodicalId":50491,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2025.2457082","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of our study was to assess the associated factors of planned and unplanned pregnancies (UPs) among pregnant women in São Paulo, Brazil.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study from March 2023 to June 2024 and invited pregnant women aged 18 to 49 years. We used the Brazilian-validated version of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy to assess pregnancy intentions. We estimated absolute and relative frequencies of planned and UPs by sociodemographic and reproductive characteristics. Bivariate and multiple regression analysis were performed to evaluate the associated factors for UPs.

Results: We included 534 participants; 65.7% reported an UP. Black or Biracial vs White women (74% vs. 57%, p < 0.001), with 0 to 9 years vs. those with >9 of schooling (77% vs. 51%, p < 0.001), and single vs married women (85% vs. 48%, p < 0.001) were associated with UPs. Parous women or those reporting a younger age at their sexual debut were more commonly reported UPs. The associated factors to UPs were being Black or Biracial (Odds ratio [OR] 1.68, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.11;2.57), reporting fewer schooling years (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.01;2.54), not being married [(OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.53;3.84) for cohabiters and OR 5.23, 95% CI 2.93;9.74) for single] and reporting additional births (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.07;1.56).

Conclusion: Black or Biracial, with fewer years of schooling, not married, and parous women were at a higher risk of UPs. These women tend to face structural barriers to planning the size and timing of their families, requiring actions like increasing tertiary education access and guaranteeing universal modern contraceptive availability to leverage these disadvantages and fulfil their sexual and reproductive rights.

居住在巴西圣保罗州的意外怀孕孕妇的社会人口统计学和生殖特征:一项横断面研究。
目的:本研究的目的是评估巴西圣保罗孕妇计划妊娠和计划外妊娠(UPs)的相关因素。方法:我们于2023年3月至2024年6月对18 ~ 49岁的孕妇进行了横断面研究。我们使用巴西认可的伦敦意外怀孕量表来评估怀孕意图。我们根据社会人口学和生殖特征估计了计划和UPs的绝对和相对频率。采用双变量和多元回归分析评价UPs的相关因素。结果:我们纳入了534名受试者;65.7%的人报告了UP。黑人或混血儿与白人女性(受教育程度74%对57%,p 9)(77%对51%,p 9)结论:黑人或混血儿、受教育年限较短、未婚和有生育能力的女性患UPs的风险较高。这些妇女在计划家庭规模和生育时间方面往往面临结构性障碍,需要采取行动,如增加高等教育机会和保证普遍获得现代避孕药具,以利用这些劣势,实现其性权利和生殖权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health, The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care publishes original peer-reviewed research papers as well as review papers and other appropriate educational material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信