Finite element analysis of primary healing implants with different transmucosal designs.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Mario Ceddia, Tea Romasco, Luca Comuzzi, Alessandro Cipollina, Adriano Piattelli, Natalia Di Pietro, Bartolomeo Trentadue
{"title":"Finite element analysis of primary healing implants with different transmucosal designs.","authors":"Mario Ceddia, Tea Romasco, Luca Comuzzi, Alessandro Cipollina, Adriano Piattelli, Natalia Di Pietro, Bartolomeo Trentadue","doi":"10.1111/jopr.14044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the response of peri-implant tissues, both hard and soft, to mechanical stress when using a primary healing implant (PHI) with two different transmucosal profiles: concave (Model A) and divergent (Model B). The investigation also sought to observe bone modeling under post-extraction conditions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The methodology involved the creation of a three-dimensional bone model of the first molar region, derived from a computed tomography scan. Subsequently, two implants were inserted into the bone site and subjected to a loading force of 100 N at a 45° angle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of stress analysis, using the von Mises criterion, indicated that Model A exhibited a more uniform stress distribution within the soft tissues, registering a maximum value of 75 MPa, in contrast to 126 MPa observed in Model B. Concerning implant stress, the peak value was recorded at the conometric connection zone between the implant and the abutment, measuring 138 MPa for Model B and 125 MPa for Model A. The study specifically analyzed cortical bone stress, which revealed levels of 72 MPa for Model B and 64 MPa for Model A. Additionally, stress distribution in immature bone ranged from 1.3 to 9 MPa for Model A and from 1.5 to 12 MPa for Model B.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The finite element method represents a valuable tool for the design and optimization of implant shapes, taking into account occlusal loads and specific anatomical locations. This approach aims to enhance the stimulation of both soft and hard tissues, thereby mitigating the risk of implant failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":49152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.14044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the response of peri-implant tissues, both hard and soft, to mechanical stress when using a primary healing implant (PHI) with two different transmucosal profiles: concave (Model A) and divergent (Model B). The investigation also sought to observe bone modeling under post-extraction conditions.

Materials and methods: The methodology involved the creation of a three-dimensional bone model of the first molar region, derived from a computed tomography scan. Subsequently, two implants were inserted into the bone site and subjected to a loading force of 100 N at a 45° angle.

Results: The results of stress analysis, using the von Mises criterion, indicated that Model A exhibited a more uniform stress distribution within the soft tissues, registering a maximum value of 75 MPa, in contrast to 126 MPa observed in Model B. Concerning implant stress, the peak value was recorded at the conometric connection zone between the implant and the abutment, measuring 138 MPa for Model B and 125 MPa for Model A. The study specifically analyzed cortical bone stress, which revealed levels of 72 MPa for Model B and 64 MPa for Model A. Additionally, stress distribution in immature bone ranged from 1.3 to 9 MPa for Model A and from 1.5 to 12 MPa for Model B.

Conclusions: The finite element method represents a valuable tool for the design and optimization of implant shapes, taking into account occlusal loads and specific anatomical locations. This approach aims to enhance the stimulation of both soft and hard tissues, thereby mitigating the risk of implant failure.

不同经黏膜设计一期愈合种植体的有限元分析。
目的:本研究旨在评估使用具有两种不同粘膜剖面:凹型(模型a)和发散型(模型B)的初级愈合种植体(PHI)时,种植体周围硬组织和软组织对机械应力的反应。该研究还试图观察拔牙后条件下的骨建模。材料和方法:方法包括创建一个三维骨模型的第一磨牙区域,源自计算机断层扫描。随后,将两个种植体插入骨位,并以45°角施加100 N的加载力。结果:采用von Mises准则进行应力分析结果表明,A模型软组织内应力分布更为均匀,最大值为75 MPa,而B模型为126 MPa。种植体应力峰值记录在种植体与基牙之间的几何连接区,B模型为138 MPa, A模型为125 MPa。结果显示,模型B为72 MPa,模型A为64 MPa。此外,模型A的未成熟骨应力分布范围为1.3 - 9 MPa,模型B的应力分布范围为1.5 - 12 MPa。结论:考虑咬合负荷和特定解剖位置,有限元方法是设计和优化种植体形状的有价值的工具。这种方法旨在增强软硬组织的刺激,从而降低种植体失败的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
171
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthodontics promotes the advanced study and practice of prosthodontics, implant, esthetic, and reconstructive dentistry. It is the official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, the American Dental Association-recognized voice of the Specialty of Prosthodontics. The journal publishes evidence-based original scientific articles presenting information that is relevant and useful to prosthodontists. Additionally, it publishes reports of innovative techniques, new instructional methodologies, and instructive clinical reports with an interdisciplinary flair. The journal is particularly focused on promoting the study and use of cutting-edge technology and positioning prosthodontists as the early-adopters of new technology in the dental community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信