System-wide assessment using the Measure of Moral Distress - Healthcare professionals.

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Adam T Booth, Kathryn L Robinson
{"title":"System-wide assessment using the Measure of Moral Distress - Healthcare professionals.","authors":"Adam T Booth, Kathryn L Robinson","doi":"10.1177/09697330251324296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Moral distress is the inability to do the right thing due to institutional constraints. The Measure of Moral Distress - Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP) measures this phenomenon and has extensively explored moral distress among nurses. There are limited large-scale research studies using the MMD-HP to identify levels of moral distress across multiple healthcare professionals (HPs) and settings.<b>Research question:</b> What are the overall levels of moral distress among HPs?<b>Research design:</b> A quantitative, exploratory, cross-sectional study of HPs in a healthcare system using the MMD-HP. <b>Participants and research context:</b> Eligible participants included HPs (<i>N</i> = 8,206) working in all inpatient and outpatient units and centers in a multi-site healthcare system located in the Southeastern United States. <b>Ethical considerations:</b> The Institutional Review Board provided approval for this research. A survey preamble supplied information within the learning management system and consent was presumed with survey completion.<b>Findings:</b> A total of 3,561 HPs completed the MMD-HP. The top three morally distressing items included compromised patient care due to inadequate resources, caring for more patients than is safe, and low quality of patient care due to poor team communication. Intensive care unit (ICU) areas had significantly greater moral distress than all other areas (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Formal leaders had the greatest moral distress (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Mixed-acuity and medical-surgical HPs accounted for 22.8% of those who reported considering leaving their current position due to moral distress. Nurses represented 42.2% of those considering leaving their current position due to moral distress.<b>Conclusions:</b> This study uniquely identified that formal leaders and HP participants in the ICU setting had the greatest moral distress. Exploring moral distress is imperative for healthcare systems to decrease turnover, improve engagement, and the quality of patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"9697330251324296"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251324296","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Moral distress is the inability to do the right thing due to institutional constraints. The Measure of Moral Distress - Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP) measures this phenomenon and has extensively explored moral distress among nurses. There are limited large-scale research studies using the MMD-HP to identify levels of moral distress across multiple healthcare professionals (HPs) and settings.Research question: What are the overall levels of moral distress among HPs?Research design: A quantitative, exploratory, cross-sectional study of HPs in a healthcare system using the MMD-HP. Participants and research context: Eligible participants included HPs (N = 8,206) working in all inpatient and outpatient units and centers in a multi-site healthcare system located in the Southeastern United States. Ethical considerations: The Institutional Review Board provided approval for this research. A survey preamble supplied information within the learning management system and consent was presumed with survey completion.Findings: A total of 3,561 HPs completed the MMD-HP. The top three morally distressing items included compromised patient care due to inadequate resources, caring for more patients than is safe, and low quality of patient care due to poor team communication. Intensive care unit (ICU) areas had significantly greater moral distress than all other areas (p < 0.001). Formal leaders had the greatest moral distress (p < 0.001). Mixed-acuity and medical-surgical HPs accounted for 22.8% of those who reported considering leaving their current position due to moral distress. Nurses represented 42.2% of those considering leaving their current position due to moral distress.Conclusions: This study uniquely identified that formal leaders and HP participants in the ICU setting had the greatest moral distress. Exploring moral distress is imperative for healthcare systems to decrease turnover, improve engagement, and the quality of patient care.

全系统评估使用道德困扰的措施-医疗保健专业人员。
背景:道德困境是由于制度约束而无法做正确的事情。道德困扰的测量-医疗保健专业人员(MMD-HP)测量这一现象,并广泛探讨护士的道德困扰。使用MMD-HP来确定多个医疗保健专业人员(hp)和环境中的道德困扰水平的大规模研究有限。研究问题:hp的道德困境总体水平如何?研究设计:使用MMD-HP对医疗保健系统中的hp进行定量、探索性、横断面研究。参与者和研究背景:符合条件的参与者包括在位于美国东南部的多站点医疗保健系统的所有住院和门诊单位和中心工作的hp (N = 8,206)。伦理考虑:机构审查委员会批准了这项研究。一项调查的序言提供了学习管理系统内的信息,调查完成即被视为同意。结果:共有3561名患者完成了MMD-HP测试。排在前三位的道德困扰项目包括:由于资源不足导致的患者护理受损、照顾的患者数量超过安全范围、以及由于团队沟通不周导致的患者护理质量低下。重症监护病房(ICU)区域的道德困扰显著高于其他所有区域(p < 0.001)。正式领导的道德困境最大(p < 0.001)。在那些因道德困扰而考虑离职的人中,有22.8%的人是混合视力和医疗外科的HPs。42.2%的护士因道德困境而考虑离职。结论:本研究独特地确定了ICU环境中的正式领导和HP参与者具有最大的道德困扰。探索道德困境是医疗保健系统减少营业额,提高参与和病人护理质量的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信