A Dynamic Interaction: Supervisors' Reasoning About Nursing Students' Conditions for Learning and Development of Clinical Competence. A Focus Group Study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Nursing Open Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.70176
Ulrika Löfgren, Birgitta Lindberg, Ulrica Strömbäck, Britt-Marie Wälivaara
{"title":"A Dynamic Interaction: Supervisors' Reasoning About Nursing Students' Conditions for Learning and Development of Clinical Competence. A Focus Group Study.","authors":"Ulrika Löfgren, Birgitta Lindberg, Ulrica Strömbäck, Britt-Marie Wälivaara","doi":"10.1002/nop2.70176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to describe supervisors' reasoning about conditions for nursing students' learning and development of clinical competence during their clinical education.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A qualitative design with an inductive approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a focus group methodology. A total of 21 supervisors from various hospital wards in northern Sweden participated in six focus groups. The data were analysed according to Krueger and Casey's description of focus groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis resulted in one overarching theme with six subthemes that described the conditions during the final year of clinical education. Students' learning and development of clinical competence was seen as an 'interplay developed over time' between the supervisor and the student, a mutual give-and-take in the supervisory relationship where both parties were responsible for ensuring that it became a growth opportunity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The major finding was that the learning and development of clinical competence in students was a result of a dynamic interplay between the student and supervisor. This process is time-dependent, and both the student and supervisor share responsibility for this progression.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and patient care: </strong>Active and conscious reflection is a crucial component in achieving clinical competence. Students should be taught and encouraged to apply and develop reflective skills throughout their education.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>The study adhered to the COREQ checklist for qualitative studies.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Registered nurses contributed data for this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":"12 3","pages":"e70176"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11876085/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70176","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to describe supervisors' reasoning about conditions for nursing students' learning and development of clinical competence during their clinical education.

Design: A qualitative design with an inductive approach.

Methods: This study used a focus group methodology. A total of 21 supervisors from various hospital wards in northern Sweden participated in six focus groups. The data were analysed according to Krueger and Casey's description of focus groups.

Results: The analysis resulted in one overarching theme with six subthemes that described the conditions during the final year of clinical education. Students' learning and development of clinical competence was seen as an 'interplay developed over time' between the supervisor and the student, a mutual give-and-take in the supervisory relationship where both parties were responsible for ensuring that it became a growth opportunity.

Conclusion: The major finding was that the learning and development of clinical competence in students was a result of a dynamic interplay between the student and supervisor. This process is time-dependent, and both the student and supervisor share responsibility for this progression.

Implications for the profession and patient care: Active and conscious reflection is a crucial component in achieving clinical competence. Students should be taught and encouraged to apply and develop reflective skills throughout their education.

Reporting method: The study adhered to the COREQ checklist for qualitative studies.

Patient or public contribution: Registered nurses contributed data for this study.

目的:本研究旨在描述导师对护生在临床教育期间的学习条件和临床能力发展的推理:方法:采用归纳法进行定性设计:本研究采用焦点小组法。共有 21 名来自瑞典北部不同医院病房的导师参加了六个焦点小组。根据 Krueger 和 Casey 对焦点小组的描述对数据进行了分析:分析得出了一个总主题和六个副主题,描述了临床教育最后一年的情况。学生在临床能力方面的学习和发展被视为导师和学生之间 "随着时间推移而形成的相互作用",是一种相互给予和接受的督导关系,双方都有责任确保这种关系成为一个成长的机会:主要发现是,学生临床能力的学习和发展是学生和导师之间动态互动的结果。这一过程与时间有关,学生和导师共同承担这一进步的责任:积极和有意识的反思是提高临床能力的关键因素。在整个教育过程中,应教授并鼓励学生应用和发展反思技能:本研究采用了定性研究的 COREQ 检查表:注册护士为本研究提供了数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信