Impact of femoral neck system removal after femoral neck fracture healing on biomechanical stability and screw stripping risk.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Biomedical Engineering Letters Pub Date : 2024-12-27 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1007/s13534-024-00452-6
Se-Won Lee, Jeongah Pak, Dohyung Lim
{"title":"Impact of femoral neck system removal after femoral neck fracture healing on biomechanical stability and screw stripping risk.","authors":"Se-Won Lee, Jeongah Pak, Dohyung Lim","doi":"10.1007/s13534-024-00452-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to determine whether the removal of the femoral neck system (FNS) after bony union affects the biomechanical stability of the femur. Considering the technical challenges and potential complications, including screw stripping reported in recent studies, the study explores whether its removal impacts stress distribution within the femur and increases the risk of complications, such as screw stripping. The femurs were grouped into Intact, Group U (healed fractures with FNS in place), and Group R (healed fractures with FNS removed). Subgroup analysis was performed using Pauwels' classification for fractures at 30, 50, and 70 degrees. Finite element analysis (FEA) was used to model and evaluate the biomechanical behavior. Material properties for the models were derived from the literature. No significant difference in biomechanical stability was observed between Group U and Group R across the fracture angles tested, indicating that removal of FNS does not compromise the structural integrity of the femur. However, the risk of screw stripping during removal requires consideration. Removing the femoral neck system (FNS) after fracture healing preserves the femur's biomechanical stability, regardless of fracture angle. However, increased stress at the distal locking screw suggests caution to avoid complications such as screw stripping.</p>","PeriodicalId":46898,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Engineering Letters","volume":"15 2","pages":"349-355"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11871177/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Engineering Letters","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-024-00452-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether the removal of the femoral neck system (FNS) after bony union affects the biomechanical stability of the femur. Considering the technical challenges and potential complications, including screw stripping reported in recent studies, the study explores whether its removal impacts stress distribution within the femur and increases the risk of complications, such as screw stripping. The femurs were grouped into Intact, Group U (healed fractures with FNS in place), and Group R (healed fractures with FNS removed). Subgroup analysis was performed using Pauwels' classification for fractures at 30, 50, and 70 degrees. Finite element analysis (FEA) was used to model and evaluate the biomechanical behavior. Material properties for the models were derived from the literature. No significant difference in biomechanical stability was observed between Group U and Group R across the fracture angles tested, indicating that removal of FNS does not compromise the structural integrity of the femur. However, the risk of screw stripping during removal requires consideration. Removing the femoral neck system (FNS) after fracture healing preserves the femur's biomechanical stability, regardless of fracture angle. However, increased stress at the distal locking screw suggests caution to avoid complications such as screw stripping.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical Engineering Letters
Biomedical Engineering Letters ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Biomedical Engineering Letters (BMEL) aims to present the innovative experimental science and technological development in the biomedical field as well as clinical application of new development. The article must contain original biomedical engineering content, defined as development, theoretical analysis, and evaluation/validation of a new technique. BMEL publishes the following types of papers: original articles, review articles, editorials, and letters to the editor. All the papers are reviewed in single-blind fashion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信